i think you missed my point...

Well you wish that Microsoft Becomes the only HD console manufacturer ??? are you out of your mind ??? Do you know the consequences of one dominant HD console especially if that dominante one is Mico$oft??? Consumers will be the biggest losers

at least Sony is forcing microsoft to slash prices and try to innovate (by copy pasting other's ideas) and by investing in new experiences!

I don't agree, unless this thread was made in jest, its a joke to think that's what Sony needs to do.

I laughed hard when you said LittleBigPlanet would sell better on the 360, without mentioning the Wii. Then I laughed harder when I read the part about Sony handing over the American market to Microsoft without mentioning Nintendo.

Good luck with your next thread.

I think he meant the original Xbox worked really well.

Seriously though... i don't think sony has enough quality internal development studios to take advantage even if they were stupid enough to do this.

Most of their money has always come from 3rd party liscensing fees.

Dont threads like this really Piss you off?
I mean, what sort of reaction was Legend expecting on this one

First bold: I wouldn't be sure about that :P You never know what Sony execs are capable of, remember PS3 was destined for success, too?

Second bold: Actually, Sony is like big sinking Titanic, you'd better have checked their health before posting your enthuasism

You above all people should be agreeing with the post, at least in the message it's trying to get across.  I remember you complaining because the RPGs you wanted to play were spread across multiple consoles.  Imagine if the vast majority of them were on one.  I really think we would be seeing Final Fantasy 13 this X'mas or very early next year if it wasn't for the extended development time because of the PS3.  Imagine playing FF13, Tales of Vesperia, White Knight Chronicles, Star Ocean 4, and many other great games NOW.  It's just too bad it couldn't have happened that way.

Popcorn's ready, Legend. Don't let me down!

That's worse, though.  To go from a reliable Xbox to an unreliable 360.

To show steady improvement in quality over time is good.  To start well then go backwards is terrible.  I also believe RROD simply shows the risks MS is willing to take to 'win' from their point of view - and I don't think that's a good thing from a consumer perspective.  360 shouldn't have released when it did, as the various 'leaks' have pretty much confirmed the QA & QC cycle was far to compressed in MS rush to market, yet MS pushed ahead then simply reached for their wallet when the game was up.

Also, it's hilarious to argue Sony should leave the field.  You might as well argue MS should never have entered it.

It's also pretty silly to miss out Nintento in this.  IMO its Nintendo who's taken Sony's crown, not MS.  If you look at trends for this gen vs previous gen (as The Source nicely included within his recent 100 weeks analysis) its obvious that in fact MS is just chipping away, very slowly growing and having to spend a fortune to do so, while Nintento and Sony have essentially completely swapped places this generation.