Killzone3, shut it...not all FPS fans care about uber graphics...there's more to shooters than that.

And where in the world do you come up with potential sales being "6 times bigger on the PS3/360 then the wii"?

We get it, you hate the Wii, now quit trolling, unless you'd like to somehow back up these ridiculous numbers.

 How the hell is a shooter fighting agianst those games ? different genre maybe.

your post was so so annoying i ignored it.

Shooters sell on the 360, Period. Ps3 not so much,  beside resistance I don't think shooters have done well on the ps3. The Darkness and RSV did pretty poorly on the ps3 (I might be wrong about this please correct me if I am ), also didn't the wii version of call of duty 3 sell better on the wii. Also FEAR didn't do that great in the ps3.  Also Resident evil 4 for the wii seems to be selling, call of duty 3 sold well,  and red steel is a million seller. Overall I think ps3 and wii have simialr sales when it comes to shooters. Also anyone know if Medal of Honour for the wii sold well or above a 100k? Thanks.

look at your replies to me, your the one trolling. I get it you hate the graphics and i shown plain as day how i got those numbers.

But screw it Iam out of this thread, one can't have a discussion with out being threatend by bias mods like benkenobi88 since my opinion is not pro wii.

Ok, well...let me explain it to you then.

Red Steel is a third party game. A rather crappy third party game. A rather crappy third party launch game that came out alongside ZELDA. What is a Wii buyer going to get, Zelda or a crappy 3rd party shooter...hmm.

That crappy third party shooter sold over a million copies...compared to Resistance, a pretty good first party FPS, that sold just under 2 million.

If a pretty good FPS gets released for the Wii, especially with its now MUCH larger userbase...it would be infinitely more profitable for third parties than a shooter on the PS3.

Can you respond to my post at least.

Those are pretty much facts, and I don't see how it can be any different...I'm out of this thread.

How do you figure potential sales are 6 times bigger on the PS3/360? Your assumption that FPSs need graphics to be good is somewhat misguided as well and just shows you falling in with the current trend as it benefits your own wants in gaming. You have no right to criticize any one gaming group for their flawed views when you yourself are doing that. If your response is going to consists of a baseless statistical claim and casually insulting an entire group of gamers instead of providing substantial logic to support your argument, then I see no reason to give you any more of my time.

@Killzone3 (as I know you'll take at least one more glance at this thread)
your point is chicken and the egg, if they don't see good results from FPS' then they won't make them and if they don't make them then how will they ever see good results.

I'm glad to inform you that that process has already begun, first with Red Steal which did sell very well even if it wasn't amazing, and now with MOH:H2, which has 32 online multiplayer. How good will MOH:H2 be is anyone guess but it does show Dev's are willing to invest money into making an FPS for the Wii.

I think the Wii Zapper really shows nintendo does wish to support the idea of shooters on the Wii, if not exactly the way I personally would like to see them.

The point of this thread was to show the other edge of Nintendo's policy of not making Mature games - that it gives 3rd parties room to steal some limelight.

It isn't about if mature games will be made for the wii as it's clear that there are a few that are in production already.