LBP IS HUGE!
it still is, we have now 50 members in the official lbp thread, and it is one of the best games I've played this gen. period
LBP IS HUGE!
it still is, we have now 50 members in the official lbp thread, and it is one of the best games I've played this gen. period
I got my girlfriend interested today for the first time. I tried getting her to play three or four times, but she wasn't interested.
Today she asked me to take out the garbage and i said "ok, but play for me" When I got back she was physically jumping up and down while crossing a chasm. she was hooked.
Reasonable said:
You're playing Fallout 4! Have I missed a few years? |
It wasn't a mistake. I was implying that I would give up LBP 2-11, and not care if they ever existed, if I could get ahold of Fallout 4 or Gears 3, early. One new Fallout game, to me, is greater than 10 LBP games. That was my point. It's a 10 to 1 ratio.
Now, I'm not saying LBP isn't a great game. I enjoy it. It's just not my kind of game. Kinda like how lately, I'd much rather play a mediocre rpg than a great fighter. In this case, Fallout 3 is a magnificant rpg, and LBP is a good 2d platformer with magnificant cutesy production value and online mode.
I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.
NO NO, NO NO NO.
I just don't understand how people can compare games in different genres and declare one "better" than the others. It would be like someone comparing an amazing horror movie to an amazing romantic comedy and declaring one movie "better" . It all comes down to personal preferences.
I would argue that L4D is far more innovative then LBP. The difference is however the innovativeness is harder to detect since it's through the director AI.
LBP is basically copying a number of computer games, and making it simplier to interface by cutting back your options and giving you limited creativeness in the hope that enough people will buy it that it isn't just regulated to people making levels and practically begging others to play them.
L4D is by for the more important innovation as well because it's one step away from procedural AI for enemies... and that will be a glorius day. When every computer soldier of a class doesn't react the same way... or of whatever.
humb_lumi said: Xbox games sell more because M$ invests a lot on marketing (not on quality)... xbox players are also young and they have a lot of free time to play 10 games a week... and to top it off... xbox360 is the cheapest video game... I think M$ is going to give a free xbox with their next windows... The idea of xbox is to become a Ps.... they buy their exclusives, they have worse hardware... Just the price is cheap.... you get what you pay for... |
MS focuses on quality, the problem was this gen where they neglected the integrity of the console to push it out the door and beat Sony to the punch. They shot themself in the foot there and they've paid for it (Literally). The original Xbox had far more value packed into the system itself than the PS2 was cheaper and had higher failure rates than the Xbox. The 360 being rushed was a one time mistake with MS. Don't expect a crappy system out of the 720.
I think the game will be pretty good in terms of over all sales in the long run.
4 ≈ One
Bitmap Frogs said: Over-the-top hype leading to frustration and expectations-management? Who would've thought! Afterall, it's only the gazillionth time it has happened this gen with a sony product. |
Trolling Sony related threads must be your hobby or something.
LBP innovative? what? LMAO
"I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007
Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions
Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.