they are not paying 3rd support but they are getting it, all the games from capcom are going multiplatform and looking at the huge base it have now it will continue getting.

third party exclusive are more likely a thing from the pass even m$ won't be getting so easy or getting at all in the future.

even valve is considering ps3 development.

whats the take? focus on first party.

and sony and nintendo got a great ground in this m$ don't.

You think Microsoft has bad first and second party development?  Bad enough that the PS3 will "dominate" them simply due to Sony's first party projects?

So, this Sony exec says that Sony will dominate Microsoft because it's first party development, which makes up about 3 percent of the games on the console, is better than Microsoft's 3 percent?

Are you saying you believe this guy? Are you defending him?

Maybe you can explain to me then, how exactly the 1-3 first/second party games released a year, by Sony, will make the PS3's library dominate the 360s, despite the 360 also having first/second party development of games like Halo 4 and Gears of War. Especially when the PS3's library already has some catching up to do.

You say that first party development will make the PS3s release list dominate the 360s, or at least you defend the man who made such an assertion, despite the fact that the 360 is also buying exclusive 3rd party development in the future, and Sony has stopped that practice. It's not debatable. It's simply untrue, assuming your definition of domination is being obviously better by a considerable margin.

1st/2nd party games are only a small percentage of games released on the PS360. Most games are multiplats, or by 3rd parties. Both companies have a slow but steady stream of quality 1st/2nd party titles. How the hell could Sony use that slow but stead 3 percent of games released on its console to completely dominate the 360's upcoming library? Simple answer, it can't. That's marketing spin, and buying/defending it is fanboyism.

I won't believe ANYTHING they have to say until they close the 5 MILLION UNIT GAP between the PS3 and the 360. Until then, makes games and keep yourself quiet.

Confidence is not the same thing as cocky.

Assertive is not the same thing as hyperbole.

Pride is not the same thing as arrogance.



Some of you would do well to learn the differences.

Actually, they do mean the same thing, except maybe the "assertive > hyperbole" example. It's just how we percieve them. However, I can't see any fair minded person percieving these comments as anything but cocky arrogance. You realize he asserted that with 1st party games, which make up max 10 percent of games on either console, he would totally dominate the 360's release list. Assuming that Sony can manage to have more exclusive games than Microsoft, how many more would they need to dominate? It's silly. Don't be biased.

Unless you're saying the opposite of what I think you're saying.

Here, here!

I agree with this man.

well it makes me feel better that my investment into the ps3 was a great idea. i buy a console because of its lifespan 10yrs is great, xbox360 has too many similarities games wise to a pc and considering how the xbox support or there lack of after a few years.

i see a few xbox fanboys saying how ms will beat sony and will beat them with a new console when it comes out sooner. seriously do u really want ms to bring out another console so soon? considering how great there support for previous products are?(sarcasm) well good luck with that, meanwhile the ps3 and ps2 are still happily sitting side by side being played on, with new games and new accessories.

but all is well, competition is healthy, i wouldnt want any one of the 3 giant companies to be the only console makers. that would be a horrible thing for consumers.