Well actually the game reminds me of Too Human and this is in my eyes a very good thing. (with better controls and waaay better camera)
The versions have about the same score on Gamerankings and Metacritic and I think that's fair and this thread should be locked, because of the massive fanboy war between Wii and HD fanboys.

My personal score for the game (360 version) would be a 9/10 since I gave Too Human a 8.5/10.

lol, so you were expecting anti-aliasing in a Wii game? o_o

''There is no real build up, no real character development, just point A to point B progression which is shocking considering how much they bragged up this being a pseudo-film experience in the behind the scenes interviews.''

^ This saddens me though.

i still think the Wii version is better than the HD, if it has go graphics much lower than Wii standard, but still, it's more enjoyable to play Wii version than Ps3.....
(Ps3 is somehow more repetitive)

if Wii version graphics were like MP3, the Wii version would be a great game!!

Oh the anger.

......

There are different reviewers for different versions of the games.
Just because of the fact that the wii received a higher score does not mean that it is better than the HD console versions.

Wii games are more or less rated within the context of other wii games. Compared to other wii games, this one recieved the score it did.

360 and PS3 are rated by completely different people, who if asked honestly would probably have rated the wii version lower.

I am not saying the wii should be rated lower. But assuming that it is the definitive version? because the wii rating is higher than that of today's video game consoles is just ridiculous.
Matt Kasamasina or Marc Bosun... whoever it was will always over-rate a game when compared to the normal rushed games they are forced to review.

Also.. @ Benga Benga, your Ban threats seem to be cherry picking at best. Saying that the wii version is comparable to the PSP version is a legitimate opinion.

If you want to play that game though, read the whole thread to find out how another poster finds it so pathetic that the PS3 has only one game, which he uses Motorstorm Pacifica? as an example. If that isn't flame bait, Then I don't know what is.

No need to be a dick about this.  I simply said that I bought the Wii version, hated it, returned it for the PS3 version and am now enjoying myself.  IMO, the HD versions are better.  Your mileage may vary.  I see you still base your fun factor on what reviewers tell you to do.

Average rating of titles selling 100k+ units in first 3 months on the Wii : 75.5%

Average rating of titles selling 100k+ units in first 3 months on PS3 : 82%

Average rating of titles selling 100k+ units in first 3 months on the 360 : 80%

Facts disagree with your opinion.......

It's nice to see how you define the taste of the average Wii user to be superior to those of the average HD console user though, gives us interesting insight into you...

Wow, does it strike a nerve with some people here to be confronted with the fact that maybe this generation is perhaps not the best all around for third party titles no matter what console you own? Or are people upset by the sheer suggestion that the HD consoles didn't get the better version of a bad game?

Must I point the hypocrisy in first attacking the review system in defense of the HD consoles then using it as proof positive that the HD consoles get better games or sell higher quality games. Cherry Picking at its finest.

But if we're going to play that game, then fine...

Considering the sheer amount of resources that go into making the average PS3 and 360 game vs the sheer amount of utterly worthless shovelware the Wii gets and how many casuals are on the Wii its pretty embarassing for the HD consoles that the gap in average game raitings at the 100k sales mark isn't larger than what we see. Also I smell cherry picking in just listing one strata of game sales (100k mark) as the standard.
And if you're going to use the excuse that different reviewers handle the different versions within the given source then I guess we can go back to every multiplatform title that the HD versions got the better score on and hold those in suspect of being skewed as well.
For that matter, if you're going to say each version's score is measured against that console and that console alone, then we can look at any game's score such as Metal Gear Solid 4's and say, it did good for a PS3 game, but only for a PS3 game.

Why is it so hard for you people to accept that a game was bad regardless what version it's on? Is it really that big a loss of pride to admit the Wii got a better version of a bad game using what is clearly a broken reviewing system you've held as holy and infailable standard for so long? Is maintaining the belief that the HD consoles get the better games really worth turning up your nose at the fact that a game is just flat out dissapointing.

OH COME ON!!!!!!!!!!!

why isn't this under my thread?!

I already have a thread and I'd like my badmouthing of the game to be acknowledged too!! Sheez!

P.S. I did like the post.