I have no clue what you're talking about in editing posts. You really are trying too hard OkeyDokey.

Do you really have any means of showing the Wii gamers buy crappy games in bulk without using the Review System? I didn't think so. All you have is that reviewer system, nothing else. And as long as that system tells you what you want to hear, you'll gladly swallow whatever you gives you.

At the very best you can only say I have no more evidence to my claim than you do yours, other than that, if you're really willing to trust a system that gave Halo 3 a 94 and GTA4 a 11/10, well then I think that speaks for itself.

Tell me, did it make you angry that I was able to come up with a better list of upcoming third party titles for the Wii than the HD consoles were getting? I really hope you have something better than spellcheck lined up for our next exchange. ;)

I didn't plan on buying a ps3 this early ya know. But when I realised the last decent game I played was Mario Kart way back in April, I decided that it was a need, not a want.

How else are we supposed to settle a difference between opinion? That's why we use review scores in the first place.
I'm not saying that a game that gets 0.3% higher than another game is better, but c'mon... Carnival Games is inarguably garbage.
That whole "any game can be good for the right person" attitude is bullshit and you know it. It's just another way for you to say "review scores aren't helping my arguement, so they don't count"

And it's pretty easy to make your Wii list appear impressive when you put it up against the worst HD games you could think of. And even then, it was only just barely better, which is a bit depressing for Wii only owners such as yourself.

How else are we supposed to settle a difference between opinion?

Again you miss the point.

Simply showing high selling games and their metacritic raitings without context is still meaningless. And you're still trying to desperately ignore the fact that your argument is hopelessly dependent on this reviewing system that is admitted to being broken. There is no criteria or credentials to being a video game reviewer and most reviewers admit the HD consoles make the kind of games they personally prefer and admit to not being able to accurately score casual games and Wii titles by the pre-existing industry standard.

The fact you would even condone a system that gives such a mediocre game as Halo3 a 94 and any game such as GTA4 a 11/10 shows your willingness to accept a system you know is horribly flawed and biased. The point I was raising is that even in this broken and biased system some of the biggest game reviewers still gave the Wii version the higher score! What does that honestly tell you about the Force Unleashed then?

If you can't adress the whole sum of my response, then what point are you trying to make? More importantly, whose opinion is the one saying those are the better games? Your argument is so hopeless dependent on this broken reviewing system.

I miss the point?

Of course it is meaningless, since it does not support your favourite console. Could you please stop ranting about broken review systems? You sound like a broken record.

Oh yeah, let's take few games that aren't on your beloved wii and say that they are mediocre. How about such mediocre games like smg/brawl/loz:tp/okami/re4/mp3 getting too good reviews? In my opinion, all of them are a lot worse than halo 3 for example. Oh! Review system is broken! Those games which I don't happen to like prove it!

Oh my, so you don't even try to defend the reviewing system, you just say I'm a broken record and that's it. You know you have no argument in defense of the reviewing system, your follow up paragraph is proof of that.

"How about such mediocre games like smg/brawl/loz:tp/okami/re4/mp3 getting too good reviews? In my opinion, all of them are a lot worse than halo 3 for example."

I think that speaks amply for itself. Good luck getting anyone to ever listen to your opinion on here ever again.