gears 2 sign me in

Put me down for Resistance.

Going to the losing side Soriku, how sad

It should be an overall rating of different sites because if Hillary Goldstein(IGN) reviews it, it will be biased because that guy overrates any game that has a gun or where you can blow up things, for example he gave Halo 3 a 9.5......way overrated.

It's really a hard one.

Some sites like change, some loathe it.

Resi looks like it changed a lot, and Gears looks like more of the same.

So it's a tough decision. And it changes all the time.

But I'll go with Resi 2 since change is better than monotony.

This will be fun.. put me down for Gears 2

Bitmap is the only guy in this thread with some sense. Whoever suggested "Gamespot, IGN, and then Gamespy" just isn't thinking straight when we can use aggregate sites.

If we only go by a couple review sites, whichever side loses is gonna claim reviewer bias, no matter if they're really biases or not. I say we go with Meta and Gamerankings.

And just how is Resistance 2 going to be THAT different? A totally new multiplayer mode, OK, I'll give it that, but for the rest, is it really going to be that different?

As far as I know, both games will have a different way of storytelling, both games will have new weapons, both games will have better graphics, both games still have the same setting (a world torn apart by aliens), both games will feature different multiplayer modes, etc.

Please explain. o_o

Resistances hands down.

Eight-Player co-op in Resistance 2 is a pretty huge change, as is the 64 player online.   And how the online mode works is crazzzzzzy different. 

Aside from that, how many shooters are really "different". 

I was just saying that it offers more change than Gears 2 which is keeping the 2 player co-op, and only making online 5-5 versus 4-4.

Not much changed.