I don't expect the single player campaign to be earth-shattering in any way, but as long as the controls are tight, which so far they appear to be just about perfect (tons of customization), the environments improve a bit and the online multiplayer is near flawless, this is a day 1 purchase for me.

No More Heroes was a smashing success and the best selling title Suda51 has ever made. It is ignorant to include it in a list of games that has done poorly.

But there is more chance of it turning out to be good since it offers good visuals and features like online and wiispeak unlike other games.In addition high voltage understands the wii owners and it's trying to make a game for us.It's not that it will suck ,did no more heroes suck?did zack and wiki suck?.Both of this games were being hyped by ign and other video games sites and they turn out to be good and your example apart from mario kart(which turned out to be good) are from ps3 games they have nothing to do with the wii so far all the great efforts to do something unique have paid off by good reviews.

Are you refering to my first post I was saying that compare to other wii games it sold decently.I admit that for a Suda51 tittle it sold really well(is there best selling game if I'm not wrong.)

 It does look pretty. Lair looks absolutely gorgeous. The system the game was released on makes no difference They hyped the games because they thought it would be good and look what happened. The only reason I can't pull up more examples for the Wii is because there has been less hype in general for Wii games. This is also one of the reasons they are pushing it so hard I imagine. Even if it is a generic shooter, it is one of maybe 5 decent generic shooters on the console. That does not make the game good, but makes it seem more appealing to some.

If your idea of a developer trying is adding in voice chat support and online multiplayer then you must have really low expectations for your Wii games, or you're just that desperate to have such basic features in a game that should include them by default. I could name you a laundry list of games on other consoles and the PC that have both features and suck donkey balls(figuratively, not literally). The Conduit should not be praised for offering such basic features that became mainstays years ago just because other developers haven't bothered wrestling with Nintendo's assbackwards online setup. Talk about graphics, talk about customized controls, but don't tell me to buy a $50 game just because it has online and voice chat. Even DS games have that.

I buy this game if it gets over 7.5 review average and the chances of that right now is almost 100 percent. Most gaming reviewers that have seen have love it, it has already won some awards (E3 awards), and hype surronding this thing is almost at a halo level on the internet.Only way game gets a low score of any kind if it has major controls issues,horrible graphics(sarcasm),Fatal game errors, almost complete reduancy, or not even fun to play in any way.

Dude, really? After all the pro-LBP stuff you've been backing or stating yourself, this is just hypocritical. You guys are all like "LBP first day purchase for me!" but if people want to be all "Conduit, first day purchase for me!" its somehow foolish? Come on now, lets not do the pot/kettle thing.

That's not the point. The OP stated that the Conduit should be purchased regardless of quality for the reason that it will encourage third parties to offer like minded games on the console and because High Voltage talks to Wii veteran gamers' sympathies in their interviews. Those, in my mind, are not reasons to purchase a game.

That seems like a poor reason to buy a game. I already made my decision on my purchase of the game, the only thing that could change my decision is if the game becomes extrememly bad. I'm buying the game because I want to play it, not because I want third parties which will most likely already come to develop for my favorite home console this generation.