By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Rotten Graphics, is it the Wii's Fault, or Lazy Sloppy Programming?

sc94597 said:
noname2200 said:
sc94597 said:
noname2200 said:
sc94597 said:
noname2200 said:
sc94597 said:







Fair Enough. When I make my analysis I'm going to explain what everything means, so maybe you could read that. It will be long though.

 


 Sounds good. Just make sure to PM me, since I sometimes don't visit the site for days, and will likely miss it. I look forward to reading it.



Around the Network

Excellent thread. Thanks for consolidating all of this info, Grampy. I'm hoping it's just a matter of time before the technically impressive Wii games make their way to store shelves. All of this half-assed development is intolerable.



disolitude said:
I am not bragging when I say this...but I own a 58 inch plasma and Wii gets played through component cables.

I see how someone with a smaller CRT TV may think Wii can compete with the ps360 but when everything is maxed out on a big screen like that...one can see Wii has more in common with gamecube/xbox then ps360.

As a matter of fact, to me Ninja gaiden on the xbox still looks better than any wii game I've ever seen including nintendos lineup. And original xbox did 720p in a few games (mortal kombat armageddon...few others)...wii has yet to do that. So I amm not sure programmers are to blame 100% here...

I really think those Nintendo component cables for the Wii are just to make HDTV owners feel good.  They really don't add much to the Wii's graphics.

The Wii was designed with the mainstream consumer in mind, and the mainstream consumer only has a CRT TV.  The Wii was designed with this in mind, and any more power would be overkill for standard definition.

From personal experience with Halo 3, Gears of War, NCAA Football, and Tiger Woods (all 360 games) on a CRT, I can tell you that these games don't look any better than Super Mario Galaxy or SSB: Brawl on the same screen.  Only if you put these games on a big HDTV, do the 360 games start to stand out from the Wii games.



Switch Code: SW-7377-9189-3397 -- Nintendo Network ID: theRepublic -- Steam ID: theRepublic

Now Playing
Switch - Super Mario Maker 2 (2019)
Switch - The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awakening (2019)
Switch - Bastion (2011/2018)
3DS - Star Fox 64 3D (2011)
3DS - Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney (Trilogy) (2005/2014)
Wii U - Darksiders: Warmastered Edition (2010/2017)
Mobile - The Simpson's Tapped Out and Yugioh Duel Links
PC - Deep Rock Galactic (2020)

Kenology said:
Excellent thread. Thanks for consolidating all of this info, Grampy. I'm hoping it's just a matter of time before the technically impressive Wii games make their way to store shelves. All of this half-assed development is intolerable.

Wii’re mad as hell and Wii’re not going to take this anymore!
Wii buy good games and Wii won’t buy anymore PS2 ports!


well itis mostly lazy developers,look at the games ninty have released so many look great



tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"

Around the Network
disolitude said:
sc94597 said:
disolitude said:
I am not bragging when I say this...but I own a 58 inch plasma and Wii gets played through component cables.

I see how someone with a smaller CRT TV may think Wii can compete with the ps360 but when everything is maxed out on a big screen like that...one can see Wii has more in common with gamecube/xbox then ps360.

As a matter of fact, to me Ninja gaiden on the xbox still looks better than any wii game I've ever seen including nintendos lineup. And original xbox did 720p in a few games (mortal kombat armageddon...few others)...wii has yet to do that. So I amm not sure programmers are to blame 100% here...
Those games also probably loss out on other things to compensate for the higher resolution. A 15 year old pc could play ES:Daggerfall at 720p. That doesn't mean it will look nice. You also said ninja gaiden looks better when upscaled in the other thread. I said it looks about equivalent to the best wii graphics. The wii only had a year anyway. I'm pretty sure the graphics will improve alot especially since nobody really pushed the wii to it's limits yet.

 


I agree that it will only get better for the wii. However, related to this topic...Wii is not really handing out its programmers an easy ride to visual bliss. They will have to squeeze and squeeze some more...so they shouldnt be fully blamed for lack of visual polish...nintendo did decide to make a less powerful console after all :)


I'm not trying to compete with an Xbox 360 or a PS3. If I wanted either one I would buy it. And yes Nintendo did decide to make a less powerful console (graphically anyway but really now no Bluetooth, no wireless out of the box - how retro is that).

 And making that less powerful console was a very brilliant idea it turns out. That said, I still expect software that is written for and takes full advantage the Wii. Nintendo does and their sales show our appreciation. A few third party do and I commend them.

What I am fed up with is developers that give us a crappy shovelware port, don't make a real effort to really integrate  motion control and then when we refuse to buy the POS, go whining about how only Nintendo can sell on Nintendo.

 



noname2200 said:
sc94597 said:
noname2200 said:
sc94597 said:
I've been saying since I joned vgchartz. I believe the wii is 3 times more powerful than the original xbox/gamecube, and 4-6 times more powerful than the ps2. I beleive it is 4-6 times less powerful than the ps360, about the same difference between the ps2 and wii is the wii and hd consoles. Devs are far too lazy. High voltage, and Tecmo/Grasshopper, and nintendo are the only ones seem to try to make good wii graphics.

I love my Wii and all, but I do think you're overestimating its graphical prowess here. By a lot. That said, it's never been the graphics that bothers me about the Wii (shoot, I still play NES games once in a while). No, the part that concerns me is the reports I've heard that the memory is too low for developers to do things like having advanced AI and the like. Mind you, from all the PC and HD console games I've played, developers don't take advantage of the hardware to give us good AI anyhow, but it's always nice to dream of a game where the computer's strategy doesn't come down to "charge!" in every situation...


Explain how I'm overestimating it. The wii has far more memory, faster memory, more efficent cpu/ gpu by alot, and texture compression that the original xbox didn't have. Since when did you need alot of memory for AI? I'm pretty sure that is mostly done by the cpu.


 True, the Wii has more of everything than even the X-Box, but I'm highly sceptical that it's three times more powerful than the X-Box was. In fact, from what I've read, it's better than the X-Box in some ways, and weaker in a select few areas. Here.

http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/levelup/archive/2007/05/08/geek-out-xbox-uber-boss-robbie-bach-takes-a-shot-at-nintendo-s-underpowered-wii-does-he-manage-to-score-a-bulls-eye-or-just-shoot-himself-in-the-foot.aspx

"Our second source echoed that assessment of the Wii's graphics chip, comparing its fixed-function design to that the Gamecube, saying that it was "basically pretty similar" to Nvidia's seven-year-old GeForce2. "A dev support guy from Nintendo said that the Wii chipset is 'Gamecube 1.5 with some added memory,'" our second source told us. "I figure if they say that, it must be true."

 

Our second source went on to explain that the "Gamecube 1.5" moniker, while accurate, doesn't mean that gamers won't see graphical improvements on the Wii. "There are three main differences which will result in graphics improvements. One, the increased memory clock speed, from 162 megahertz to 243 megahertz, means that it is easier to do enough pixels for 480p mode versus 480i. Two, the enhanced memory size of the Wii gives much more room for image-related operations such as anti-aliasing, motion blur, etc. The performance to these memory systems from the graphics chip is also improved. So full-screen effects and increased texture usage seem likely as a result.""

 

My conclusion: the Wii has enough stuff under the hood to get us the games, but it's hardly a graphical powerhouse. I'm perfectly fine with that: as I said, I still go back and play old games on a regular basis, so graphics take a big backseat in my book. And besides, as you yourself have shown, the Wii is quite capable of putting out the eye-candy when the developer wants it to. But it does us no good to overestimate its graphics. 

 

As for the AI issue, you may well be right. I'm simply echoing what I've heard from others, since my knowledge of how software works is sketchy at best. If you're correct, and if the Wii's CPU is good enough to give me the smart AI I crave, then I take back what I said about that. But I stand by my comment that damn few developers devote as much attention and energy to AI as they should, no matter what the platform.

 


 That bolded part alone makes me doubt the second sources opinion. The majority of Gamecube games supported 480p. The Gamecube was just as capable as the X-box. Factor 5 can speak from experience. Rogue Squadron 2 and 3 were going to be ported to X-box on a single disc but they couldn't get the game running on X-box hardware. 

I've said this in the past and I will say it again. The reason developers are having issues with the Wii hardware are because they never bothered to learn the Gamecube hardware. Few if any third party developers built game engines that were built from the ground up on Gamecube. The Gamecube, like the Wii was riddled with shoddy PS2 ports. Quite a few developers have been quoted complaining about how the Wii can't do certain effects that the Gamecube is capable of do their ignorance of the architecture.



Most Wii games, and every other consoles games for that matter are rushed and aimed to make souly for pure profit, not because of the customers enjoyment, Thus making shit looking games.

They don't care about the Consoles capabilities, they just want to get it out of the workshop right away.

Alot of massive creators these days (Kojima etc) Not only make games for money, they also make them because it's their passion and they love to keep their story alive, and that is why all major games from these creators always look fantastic.

Those Super Mario Galaxy screenshots are pure proof that the Wii can produce amazing graphics.



Current Consoles: Xbox 360 Elite, Playstation 2, Gaming Rig, Nintendo Wii, Playstation 3.

Xbox Live: Jessman_Aus - Playing: Ace Combat 6, Fifa 09

Playstation Network: Jessman_Aus - Playing: MGS4, Resistance 2

Wii Freind Code: 3513-9191-8534-3866 - Playing: SSBB

Brawl Code: 1590-6125-1250

Xfire: J3ssman - Playing: Fallout 3, Farcry 2

Jessman: Fears the Mangina

 

                                

BUMP

I think people would like to read this thread.



Current Consoles: Xbox 360 Elite, Playstation 2, Gaming Rig, Nintendo Wii, Playstation 3.

Xbox Live: Jessman_Aus - Playing: Ace Combat 6, Fifa 09

Playstation Network: Jessman_Aus - Playing: MGS4, Resistance 2

Wii Freind Code: 3513-9191-8534-3866 - Playing: SSBB

Brawl Code: 1590-6125-1250

Xfire: J3ssman - Playing: Fallout 3, Farcry 2

Jessman: Fears the Mangina

 

                                

Why another thread telling us about the awesome power of the Wii. The Wii cannot produce graphics that are incredible for this day and age. It was never designed to. Since we have been told so many times it's all about gameplay over graphics and about the casual consumer who don't really care about graphics either... why bother? Even Wii sports the showcase game sets terrible graphical standards. Wii sports is the accepted look for a Wii game. I think if Wii sports were to feature decent graphics then you would see developers pushing the Wii harder. A case of less is more perhaps? If you want graphics go for the 360 or PS3 or a high end PC



Yes