By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Steam Machine starts at $1049

Valves decision to not subsidise the price at all is bizarre. Their profit margins are insane, with a low number of employees running a platform that prints money.

If valve aren't willing to take steps like subsidising to get a foothold in the hardware market, why even make hardware?

This thing isn't going to notably benefit their business in anyway, whereas creating a product that could entice console gamers absolutely could have.



Around the Network

If there's a gaming god, this price is clearly a plague inflicted on PC bros inflicting everything they've said of Nintendo upon their hardware.

....More seriously I'm going to point at this thing everytime a PC gamer acts like the Switch 2 costs an arm and a leg. The Steam Machine costs the entire body



The Democratic Nintendo fan....is that a paradox? I'm fond of one of the more conservative companies in the industry, but I vote Liberally and view myself that way 90% of the time?

Nice paper launch in Japan, Gabe must of asked Jensen for advise.



Zippy6 said:

Valves decision to not subsidise the price at all is bizarre. Their profit margins are insane, with a low number of employees running a platform that prints money.

If valve aren't willing to take steps like subsidising to get a foothold in the hardware market, why even make hardware?

This thing isn't going to notably benefit their business in anyway, whereas creating a product that could entice console gamers absolutely could have.

Valve just confirmed that they have zero sway in the RAM business where they're treated like nobodies. Sony and Nintendo can get components (not RAM necessarily, but components in general) at lower prices, maybe even before accounting for their ability to sell a 100 million+ units. They're just not on a level playing field. 

Subsidizing would hardly move the needle unless they price their hardware notably lower than a console. So they may as well capitalize on Gabe worshippers instead. SteamDeck was quite cheap and yet practically had zero impact on consoles, I don't think it would have played out differently with a reasonably priced SteamMachine (slightly more expensive than the equivalent console). They never really had a chance, certainly not now with these crazy DDR prices.



Zippy6 said:

Valves decision to not subsidise the price at all is bizarre. Their profit margins are insane, with a low number of employees running a platform that prints money.

If valve aren't willing to take steps like subsidising to get a foothold in the hardware market, why even make hardware?

This thing isn't going to notably benefit their business in anyway, whereas creating a product that could entice console gamers absolutely could have.

They wanna avoid people buying them at a loss but end up just using them as a work PC and never even touching Steam on it. Being able to use it as a normal PC is a huge benefit but that's the downside of that.



Around the Network

The biggest consequence towards gaming hardware so far thanks to AI. Wish Elon's parents used protection.



Found this and immediately thought of this thread. After watching this, I'm convinced the video isn't satire, it's archival footage of the exact moment gamers saw the price tag. The comments, the reactions, the disbelief, all that's missing is someone calculating the monthly payments.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGap2WU9xe0



Console makers should wait for RAM and memory prices to drop before releasing their next consoles.