By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - PS4 is still getting games in 2026

Tagged games:

JackHandy said:
Dante9 said:

Thank you.

Why would I try to be dishonest in a conversation like this, what would that accomplish? I gave you an insight into my personal experience and it is as valid as anyone else's.

In your original comment, you stated every game up until this generation was "shitty". No rational person, thinking rationally, would ever believe such a thing. That's why I said you either had to be lying about your age (because a ten year old could plausibly believe it) or lying to yourself.

That was my personal evaluation and opinion, I think you understand that but it seems I managed to offend you and perhaps others. That was not my intention, and of course I was being a bit hyperbolic about it. At the time those games were the best we could get, but most of them were not very fulfilling experiences to me even as a kid. They were glimpses of what could be possible some day. And especially as things have evolved, to me they really have been exposed to be pretty shitty in comparison.

That doesn't mean you are wrong to have liked them or even still liking them, these are subjective things. For the same reason, it also doesn't mean you get to deem it impossible or irrational for anyone to feel like old games were shitty.

Anyways, originally I was simply responding to the idea that kids nowadays have missed out on something good because they have not experienced the first gens of gaming. In my view, they are not worse off than us and gaming today is better than back then. That's all.



Around the Network
Dante9 said:
JackHandy said:

In your original comment, you stated every game up until this generation was "shitty". No rational person, thinking rationally, would ever believe such a thing. That's why I said you either had to be lying about your age (because a ten year old could plausibly believe it) or lying to yourself.

That was my personal evaluation and opinion, I think you understand that but it seems I managed to offend you and perhaps others. That was not my intention, and of course I was being a bit hyperbolic about it. At the time those games were the best we could get, but most of them were not very fulfilling experiences to me even as a kid. They were glimpses of what could be possible some day. And especially as things have evolved, to me they really have been exposed to be pretty shitty in comparison.

That doesn't mean you are wrong to have liked them or even still liking them, these are subjective things. For the same reason, it also doesn't mean you get to deem it impossible or irrational for anyone to feel like old games were shitty.

Anyways, originally I was simply responding to the idea that kids nowadays have missed out on something good because they have not experienced the first gens of gaming. In my view, they are not worse off than us and gaming today is better than back then. That's all.

Forgive me but fuu iam getting triggered by this.

Yea kids nowadays have it so good with 3 genns of fortnite,dlc, microtransactions, 100 "open world but nothing to so in them and play all the same" 

Wait a year or 2 for all the patches so you can finally have the game we promised to deliver but we f up (cyberpunk for example)

Buy these dlc packs so you can have to full game!

Yea modern games have created a sort of blueprint of gameplay at how a game should be played, but it made all these games copy/paste/boring.

Tell me any game who had the same " holy shit this is cool" impact in modern gaming like for example devil may cry on ps2 had.

Tell me a modern game that has the same depth in story as xenosaga trilogy or mass effect(if you call this a retro game at least)(okej maybe claire obscure 33,havent played that game)

I understand its your opinion but you are one of the verry few who thinks this.

Modern gaming can be amazing...but dont tell me kids have it better then growing up and LITTERLY seeing gaming invole from nes to ps5



 

My youtube gaming page.

http://www.youtube.com/user/klaudkil

curl-6 said:

Yeah I'm gonna have to strongly disagree with the notion that previous generations were "shitty".

You'll never convince me that games like Super Mario World, RE4, Metroid Prime, Donkey Kong Country, Banjo Kazooie, Halo, Doom, and countless others are shitty games just cos graphics technology has advanced since they were made.

Hell, even the PS4 itself is now way out of date, but that doesn't mean Uncharted 4 or RE7 or Monster Hunter World aren't great games.

Maybe the issue is that I just came off abrasive. Obviously I or anyone else can't say that any game is *objectively* shitty, because it is a matter of taste. One might even say they aren't shitty for their time, but they can feel shitty now in comparison. If they were perfect, why don't Nintendo and others make them with the same 8-bit tech any more, or whatever they might have used? Or maybe you just don't like the word "shitty"? Too strong of an expression? Fair enough. Let's say "lackluster" instead, but the point remains.

Maybe there are people who truly don't see any difference, no matter the bits or whatever, but I'm not one of those people. All inventions in human history have a habit of going from rudimentary to more advanced, and games are no exception in that regard.

And like I said, the PS4 era was my personal breaking point. For some subjective reason, for me personally the PS4 was the point that felt like this is enough, it doesn't need to get better than this. PS3 games felt good in their time, but now they feel less so for me because I have experienced something better. These are personal feelings. I might completely change my mind about the PS4 as well as we move forward, that's also possible.



Dante9 said:

Maybe the issue is that I just came off abrasive. Obviously I or anyone else can't say that any game is *objectively* shitty, because it is a matter of taste. One might even say they aren't shitty for their time, but they can feel shitty now in comparison. If they were perfect, why don't Nintendo and others make them with the same 8-bit tech any more, or whatever they might have used? Or maybe you just don't like the word "shitty"? Too strong of an expression? Fair enough. Let's say "lackluster" instead, but the point remains.

Maybe there are people who truly don't see any difference, no matter the bits or whatever, but I'm not one of those people. All inventions in human history have a habit of going from rudimentary to more advanced, and games are no exception in that regard.

And like I said, the PS4 era was my personal breaking point. For some subjective reason, for me personally the PS4 was the point that felt like this is enough, it doesn't need to get better than this. PS3 games felt good in their time, but now they feel less so for me because I have experienced something better. These are personal feelings. I might completely change my mind about the PS4 as well as we move forward, that's also possible.

Interesting. I'm few years older than you, been gaming since late 70s, and I always had this "you modern kids unfortunately never experienced what massive leaps really feel like". And not just graphically. Currently, I feel that gameplay-wise, gaming has been stagnant for at least 2 generations, and actually regressed from the past games in many aspects. Complexity and depth being one of them - industry mostly settled on the safe recipes to attract genre tourists, since, in most cases, that's what makes the most money.

However, this will change in the future, so I think that current generation of kids might really experience some groundbreaking leaps.



Dante9 said:
curl-6 said:

Yeah I'm gonna have to strongly disagree with the notion that previous generations were "shitty".

You'll never convince me that games like Super Mario World, RE4, Metroid Prime, Donkey Kong Country, Banjo Kazooie, Halo, Doom, and countless others are shitty games just cos graphics technology has advanced since they were made.

Hell, even the PS4 itself is now way out of date, but that doesn't mean Uncharted 4 or RE7 or Monster Hunter World aren't great games.

Maybe the issue is that I just came off abrasive. Obviously I or anyone else can't say that any game is *objectively* shitty, because it is a matter of taste. One might even say they aren't shitty for their time, but they can feel shitty now in comparison. If they were perfect, why don't Nintendo and others make them with the same 8-bit tech any more, or whatever they might have used? Or maybe you just don't like the word "shitty"? Too strong of an expression? Fair enough. Let's say "lackluster" instead, but the point remains.

Maybe there are people who truly don't see any difference, no matter the bits or whatever, but I'm not one of those people. All inventions in human history have a habit of going from rudimentary to more advanced, and games are no exception in that regard.

And like I said, the PS4 era was my personal breaking point. For some subjective reason, for me personally the PS4 was the point that felt like this is enough, it doesn't need to get better than this. PS3 games felt good in their time, but now they feel less so for me because I have experienced something better. These are personal feelings. I might completely change my mind about the PS4 as well as we move forward, that's also possible.

For me it's like this: is the Mona Lisa lackluster because it was created in a bygone era of technology? What about Citizen Kane, or the Taj Mahal, or Beethoven?

The value of human expression goes beyond the technical tools used to create it; Super Mario Bros is still an enjoyable experience even if its now technologically primitive. Older generations weren't just lackluster stepping stones to get where we are today, they were great in their own right.



Around the Network
Dante9 said:
Veknoid_Outcast said:

Dude, don't do that. It's one thing to disagree with someone, but it's quite another to insist he's not being honest with himself. That's supremely messed up, and a quick and easy way to destroy a conversation. Show a little respect and try to debate in good faith. And build an argument without calling into question your opponent's ability to think rationally.

Thank you.

Why would I try to be dishonest in a conversation like this, what would that accomplish? I gave you an insight into my personal experience and it is as valid as anyone else's.

Sure, gaming is always going to evolve into something more advanced, but when I was gaming in the eighties and nineties, I always felt it could be so much better. It's not just about graphics either, it's about depth and what games could do overall.

I guess it's also about the types of games you happen to like. For me, simple platformers and such just won't do, and growing up in the ancient times it took a long time for gaming to evolve beyond that. If simplicity is fun for you, the eighties and nineties were already fine for you and there's nothing wrong with that either.

For me, some kind of breaking point came when the PS4 generation came(I forget the gen numbers). I felt like this feels advaced enough for me in terms of graphics, storytelling, complexity and everything. I would be fine if this was the best it ever got, I thought. Everything from that point on is just more gravy.

Don't get me wrong, I won't be complaining about all the possibilities AI and whatnot will give us in the future, if they are implemented correctly. Things like NPCs you could have real time conversations with instead of fixed dialogue trees, now that would be something.

I completely appreciate this perspective. And I agree in some ways. I do think game design improved generational over generation, but I believe it plateaued earlier -- in the sixth gen, to be precise. That, for me, was the ideal intersection of creativity, technology, and ambition. The seventh, eighth, ninth, and now tenth gens have provided some amazing experiences, including experiences impossible on older tech, but, in general, it feels like we're now on the downward slope of the bell curve.



Dante9 said:
curl-6 said:

Yeah I'm gonna have to strongly disagree with the notion that previous generations were "shitty".

You'll never convince me that games like Super Mario World, RE4, Metroid Prime, Donkey Kong Country, Banjo Kazooie, Halo, Doom, and countless others are shitty games just cos graphics technology has advanced since they were made.

Hell, even the PS4 itself is now way out of date, but that doesn't mean Uncharted 4 or RE7 or Monster Hunter World aren't great games.

Maybe the issue is that I just came off abrasive. Obviously I or anyone else can't say that any game is *objectively* shitty, because it is a matter of taste. One might even say they aren't shitty for their time, but they can feel shitty now in comparison. If they were perfect, why don't Nintendo and others make them with the same 8-bit tech any more, or whatever they might have used? Or maybe you just don't like the word "shitty"? Too strong of an expression? Fair enough. Let's say "lackluster" instead, but the point remains.

Maybe there are people who truly don't see any difference, no matter the bits or whatever, but I'm not one of those people. All inventions in human history have a habit of going from rudimentary to more advanced, and games are no exception in that regard.

And like I said, the PS4 era was my personal breaking point. For some subjective reason, for me personally the PS4 was the point that felt like this is enough, it doesn't need to get better than this. PS3 games felt good in their time, but now they feel less so for me because I have experienced something better. These are personal feelings. I might completely change my mind about the PS4 as well as we move forward, that's also possible.

While I also personally disagree with your initial take, I do get it is just an opinion and am not offended.  I personally had fun with every generation I have been apart of while understanding it was not the pinnacle.  Pitfall on the 2600 was fun along with Dig-Dug and some others.  Legend of Zelda really grabbed me and I am a fan of the series to this day.  Also on the NES Final Fantasy was an early favorite (it seemed such a big world and had a real story) I was a steadfast fan of that series all the way up until around FF10 then didn't care so much for the direction they were taking the series.  Anyhow I digress ...

For me Perspective is important and rolling with games through the years has allowed us to witness their evolution firsthand.  I feel as if it gives us a perspective that new generations just won't have, experiencing that cutting edge (well as close as a mostly console gamer can experience said cutting edge) time and again.

When eventually we advance beyond even VR I don't think I will find what came before to be sub-par or lackluster but will still think fondly of it as product of its time.

Speaking of the future ... What would it take for you to consider the PS4 era as lackluster?  Are we talking about VR but in the vein of Ready Player One?  Are we talking games that interact directly with the brain (perhaps while you sleep : if that wouldn't screw our ability to store memories) or are we talking Star Trek style Holo Deck?