IcaroRibeiro said:
Bethesda was already mediocre even in 7th gen, truth be told Bethesda releasing games for consoles have done irreparable damage to the quality of their RPGs, with the last good Fallout (New Vegas) not even being developed by Bethesda itself lol EA... do they even have a single good game in any generation? I'm really asking because I can't think of any. I'm asking genuinely because I only remember them as developer of sports games As for Ubisoft, I think their early 7th gen games were important because it was an era we were still figuring out how to properly develop HD games with a large scope and scale, but from a purely gameplay perspective I've always found their games to not be that good tbh As for Activision they fully embraced the role of being a publisher rather than a developer. Blizzard still releasing/maintaining very good games, but they are mostly focused on live services which single player gamers hate I guess, but they are still competent in this specific market I'd say |
Well, remember that I framed these groups as publishers, not developers. And I think they delivered some of the best, most consequential titles of the 6th and 7th gens.
Bethesda brought us The Elder Scrolls III-V, Fallout 3, and New Vegas.
Ubisoft brought us Ghost Recon, Rainbow Six, Splinter Cell, Prince of Persia, Far Cry, etc.
EA brought us Dead Space, Dragon Age, Mass Effect 2/3, 007, Lord of the Rings, Burnout, Battlefield, etc.
Activision brought us Tony Hawk and presided over the golden age of Call of Duty.
It would be difficult to talk about the finest games of that era without these companies.












