CourageTCD said:
Do you realize that even if he had 10 guns or more with him, he would still be dead by now? He believed guns save people but no amount of guns he had would protect him from what happened today |
i didnt say if he had a gun he would be alive
I wonder what Parker and Stone are thinking? I wonder who future episodes will target?
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.
I intensely disliked him. He wasn't terrible enough to deserve dying so young...hundreds of millions of people are equally evil/brainwashed and I don't wish them death.
I feel sorry for the children he left behind, and mourn the fact that lunatic conservatives and right wingers will label him a courageous martyr of sorts. I pray that his murder won't lead more division, hatred, and deaths... but who am I kidding? This world is going straight to hell.
Some notable game devs chime in, including from Ghost of Yotei, Bungie, and The Coalition
He was a Godily man, who was assassinated because of radical left indoctrination.
我是广州人
| Ashadelo said: He was a Godily man, who was assassinated because of radical left indoctrination. |
Oh, do we know who did it and their motives already?
They should have conceal carried so that the gunman could be taken care of quickly. If people knew that others carried and would defend each other then this kind of violence would stop happening.
| Ashadelo said: He was a Godily man, who was assassinated because of radical left indoctrination. |
Too soon to say, his killer has yet to be identified, much less their motive.
Last edited by curl-6 - on 11 September 2025
When one uses an absolute as an argument, such as "you should never celebrate another person's death", it is useful to take it to the extreme and see if it still holds up. Think of the worst person you can, the most evil human being in history. That might be a different person depending on your views. Would it be wrong to celebrate their death? I don't think so, and you most likely don't think so either. In that case, the absolute is false, and there is a line one can cross that would make their death celebratable. You can argue where that line is, whether or not Charlie Kirk's death is celebratable, but you can't use "you shouldn't celebrate another person's death" as a reply to someone doing so.
| Lucca said: When one uses an absolute as an argument, such as "you should never celebrate another person's death", it is useful to take it to the extreme and see if it still holds up. Think of the worst person you can, the most evil human being in history. That might be a different person depending on your views. Would it be wrong to celebrate their death? I don't think so, and you most likely don't think so either. In that case, the absolute is false, and there is a line one can cross that would make their death celebratable. You can argue where that line is, whether or not Charlie Kirk's death is celebratable, but you can't use "you shouldn't celebrate another person's death" as a reply to someone doing so. |
I can at least confidently say that there is not a single person in american politics (my home country) where I would celebrate this, say this is deserved, or not feel any sort of sympathy/empathy for them or their family. not one. and thats an easy call to make.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
Currently Online 
