By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Neglecting my Switch since 2020, has it stagnated or is there still good stuff on it?

 

Switches best year...

2017 2 22.22%
 
2018 0 0%
 
3019 2 22.22%
 
2020 1 11.11%
 
2021 1 11.11%
 
2022 1 11.11%
 
2023 2 22.22%
 
2024 0 0%
 
Total:9
LegitHyperbole said:
IcaroRibeiro said:

Engage is the successor to Fates especially Conquest* (but significantly easier than Conquest, which is the hardest FE in my opinion), while Three Houses is more like the successor to Echoes: Shadows of Valentia

The gameplay is different, the art style is terrible, and the story is lackluster

Map design is awesome easily top 3 in the franchise unlike Three Houses, where the maps are rather poor. Combat mechanics are refined, even more than Three Houses. It lacks a bit in RPG elements but is rich in tactical elements.

It features a larger cast and is "Ironman-friendly," meaning it lets you lose units without much penalty (in Three Houses, if you let your units die, you're in trouble). Almost all characters will join you automatically, unlike in Three Houses, where you need to grind support to recruit them

It doesn't feature the calendar system inherited from Persona. instead, it follows the Sacred Stones/Awakening structure, with story progression tied to maps and optional skirmishes if you feel like it.

In my opinion, it's an FE game for FE veterans. If Three Houses was your only game, I'm not sure if you'll like it.

Oh well, without the calander progression I doubt I'd like it as much. The tactical play while good and addicting wasn't really what made that game great. It was one of three pillars. That, the calander progression and the characters. I would hope for a Three houses sequel that expands on these ideas, namely expanded on exploration during the calander cycle, having an open world instead of just a hub town/school would blow skulls wide open. 

Unfortunately the cast on Engage is terrible. 3 Houses features one of the best casts in the series, and my personal favorite tied to Path of Radiance. Engage could be a fun experience though because it features older FE main characters who fight as your allies in the form of spirits called "Emblems", they give you extra stats and exclusive abilities, it's really fun to find combinations 

Because of Engage mechanics and the large host of characters, numerous classes and skills I have over 400 hours on Engage (I have 600h on 3H for comparison)

I've found Engage to be harder and more tactical compared to 3H, but also more balanced. Specially on Maddening. 

3H is like Hard = Easy, Maddening = Hell since the beginning 

Engage is like Hard = Fair, Maddening = Start a bit harder than Hard and finishes extremely hard, but the difficulty curve is balanced 

In 3H I always felt you need to truly master the game's "Meta" to be able to play on Maddening 

While on Engage you can actually play non optimally and still beat if you play smart. That's said some maps (DLC maps) can be obnoxiously hard. Soren's and Camila's paralogues drove me crazy 

But of course only people who play on the hardest difficulties will care for those things

Last edited by IcaroRibeiro - 14 hours ago

Around the Network
IcaroRibeiro said:
LegitHyperbole said:

Oh well, without the calander progression I doubt I'd like it as much. The tactical play while good and addicting wasn't really what made that game great. It was one of three pillars. That, the calander progression and the characters. I would hope for a Three houses sequel that expands on these ideas, namely expanded on exploration during the calander cycle, having an open world instead of just a hub town/school would blow skulls wide open. 

Unfortunately the cast on Engage is terrible. 3 Houses features one of the best casts in the series, and my personal favorite tied to Path of Radiance. Engage could be a fun experience though because it features older FE main characters who fight as your allies in the form of spirits called "Emblems", they give you extra stats and exclusive abilities, it's really fun to find combinations 

Because of Engage mechanics and the large host of characters, numerous classes and skills I have over 400 hours on Engage (I have 600h on 3H for comparison)

I've found Engage to be harder and more tactical compared to 3H, but also more balanced. Specially on Maddening. 

3H is like Hard = Easy, Maddening = Hell since the beginning 

Engage is like Hard = Fair, Maddening = Start a bit harder than Hard and finishes extremely hard, but the difficulty curve is balanced 

In 3H I always felt you need to truly master the game's "Meta" to be able to play on Maddening 

While on Engage you can actually play non optimally and still beat if you play smart. That's said some maps (DLC maps) can be obnoxiously hard. Soren's and Camila's paralogues drove me crazy 

But of course only people who play on the hardest difficulties will care for those things

Damn, I guess maddening isn't for me. I found everything just preceeding the time jump and after in 3H to be legit challenging or perhaps it was just easy up til that point and then it jumped in difficulty, I can't tell. 



Slownenberg said:
LegitHyperbole said:

Nintendo hasn't put out anything first party that looks good to me since I left my switch off to the side in 2020 but is there anything second party or third party I can't get on my go to ecosystem, Playstation? Or has the Switch stagnated like I believe it has, seems like everything good happened between 2017 and 2020. 

BTW, I have played some stuff on it since 2020 but indie stuff, Dusk, Steam world Dig, slay the Spire but all I could have gotten on Playstation bar Dusk. 

Damn. Interesting point of view. There's tons of great games on Switch. You have definitely missed a ton. There's too many great games on Switch for me to even keep up. I could probably skip the entire next gen and just spend that time catching up on my Switch backlog.

I won't bother putting in a list, but you're talking about a system that will likely end up being the second most successful system ever, needless to say it has had a ton of great games come out on it in the past few years.

Yeah, people mentioned a good few already that I had no idea of even though I check my wish list every no and then and comb for indies, the Store never showed me Bayonetta 3 for example nor did I hear of it until today which is odd cause I spend so much time each day listening to gaming news and updates. Can't believe one of my favourite series in my favourite genre went completely under the radar. 



firebush03 said:

(The lack of Pikmin 4 and KirbyTLF is highly concerning.)

Not my kinds of games. Wanted to keep things limited to just 3 titles.

LegitHyperbole said:

Oh yeah, I forgot Rise was a Nintendo exclusive. I suppose that was the last good Nintendo game I played even though I played it fully on ps4 and it's expansion.

I never said my list was just Switch exclusive.
A few games are remasters/remakes from other platforms.

My list is a list of games (My top 3 per year) that are worth playing on Switch.



--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--

Pemalite said:
firebush03 said:

(The lack of Pikmin 4 and KirbyTLF is highly concerning.)

Not my kinds of games. Wanted to keep things limited to just 3 titles.

LegitHyperbole said:

Oh yeah, I forgot Rise was a Nintendo exclusive. I suppose that was the last good Nintendo game I played even though I played it fully on ps4 and it's expansion.

I never said my list was just Switch exclusive.
A few games are remasters/remakes from other platforms.

My list is a list of games (My top 3 per year) that are worth playing on Switch.

I'm not being smart. I legit forgot that it was a Nintendo Eclusive and it was a Nintendo exclusive for a time.