Explain how you rate games and your reasoning behind the scoring.

[LegitHyperbole]

100% or 100 point scale? A scale of 1 to 10? Five stars? Tier from F to S? What does your system mean for you? I'm particularly interested in how people use a 100 point scale to conclude at a score like 89 out of 100 instead of rounding to a 9.

I use a scale of 1 to 10.

1. Absolutely broken or unplayable
2. Extremly bad in most aspects, a pain to play
3. Bad in most aspects, very unpleasent
4. Poor in most aspects, unfun
5. Average/Bland/bits of fleeting fun
6. Average/poor/good in few aspects with some mild fun to be had
7. Good in most aspects and fun
8. Great in most aspects with loads of fun
9. Phenomenal in most aspects with immense fun
10. Masterpiece and immensely addicting, near flawless

Or close enough to the above, technicals like image stability, glitches, crashes and other objective stuff make sure that some games get stuck between these classifications as points are reduced accordingly and I have to judge wheter to round up or down. 

Last edited by LegitHyperbole - 2 hours ago