Then read my prior post, watch the videos I provided. Clearly there is more to it than *just* cutting your proverbial hyperbole, fps in half.

Also, since when has Nintendo gamers cared about framerates?

Some of the best games on Switch are 30fps experiences like... Breath of the Wild, Tears of the Kingdom, Luigi's Mansion 3, Xenoblade, Animal Crossing, Monster Hunter, Octopath, Links Awakening, Mario Odyssey and more, which are all 30fps experiences and sold amazingly well.

Not only that, but just because you have fantastic hardware, does not, has not and will not ever guarantee 60fps. - It's a design choice on the developer, the SNES had 60fps games... And here we are today, 23 years later... And many games are still 30fps.
The SNES has 128kb ram, CPU@3.58Mhz.
The Switch has 4,194,304kb ram, 4 core CPU@1020Mhz.

Hardware isn't the issue, developer design goals are what determines frame-rates.

Which is why we still get Playstation 5 and Xbox Series X titles at 30fps. Developer design goals.

Holding back hardware feature sets because you are literally scared to receive a 30fps experience is absolutely bizarre, you are still going to get 30fps games either way. - I am even willing to put money on it.

You want 60fps? Get a PC.

However, Switch 2 needs hardware feature set parity with the Xbox Series X/S, Playstation 5 and PC, because that ultimately ensures cross-platform ports... And lets be honest, the Switch's 2 hardware is going to be portable and low-end, so it needs every little bit of help it can get in that regard.

Then read my prior post, watch the videos I provided. Clearly there is more to it than *just* cutting your proverbial hyperbole, fps in half.

Also, since when has Nintendo gamers cared about framerates?

Some of the best games on Switch are 30fps experiences like... Breath of the Wild, Tears of the Kingdom, Luigi's Mansion 3, Xenoblade, Animal Crossing, Monster Hunter, Octopath, Links Awakening, Mario Odyssey and more, which are all 30fps experiences and sold amazingly well.

Not only that, but just because you have fantastic hardware, does not, has not and will not ever guarantee 60fps. - It's a design choice on the developer, the SNES had 60fps games... And here we are today, 23 years later... And many games are still 30fps.
The SNES has 128kb ram, CPU@3.58Mhz.
The Switch has 4,194,304kb ram, 4 core CPU@1020Mhz.

Hardware isn't the issue, developer design goals are what determines frame-rates.

Which is why we still get Playstation 5 and Xbox Series X titles at 30fps. Developer design goals.

Holding back hardware feature sets because you are literally scared to receive a 30fps experience is absolutely bizarre, you are still going to get 30fps games either way. - I am even willing to put money on it.

You want 60fps? Get a PC and abandon consoles, especially handhelds.

However, Switch 2 needs hardware feature set parity with the Xbox Series X/S, Playstation 5 and PC, because that ultimately ensures cross-platform ports... And lets be honest, the Switch's 2 hardware is going to be portable and low-end, so it needs every little bit of help it can get in that regard.

Many switch games run at 60 fps as do many ps5 games.

And I have a PC.  You might want to do your homework next time.

And you seem entirely wanting to miss the point.  System resources going to RT or fps...  I'll take fps all day long.  

The leaked Switch 2 chip, Tegra T239 is at least Ampere based at minimum, Ampere based Nvidia chips in terms of feature set are better than the AMD crap that's in the PS5 and XSX, so on that end I think Nintendo is fine. 

In fact, I think the buzz is Tegra T239 not only is Ampere based but even has Lovelace based aspects, which is like two generations beyond the AMD GPUs in the PS5/XSX. 

And many run at 30fps, completely undermining your point and solidifying mine.

We don't get to choose if a game is 30fps or 60fps, it's up to the developer, not the hardware, not the technology, the developer... Otherwise every game since Pong which was released in 1972 from Atari would be 60fps because hardware has gotten orders-of-magnitude faster.

Again, I'll repeat myself. Abandon consoles and stick to PC gaming if all your care about is framerate, but leave those who wish to see technological progress and visuals being pushed, be pushed.

Again, I have provided EVIDENCE that games can run at 60fps with Ray Tracing.

Again. It's up to the developer.

RT itself is not the issue.

In-fact many PS5 games have Ray Tracing + 60fps caps.
A list can be found here (Again, this thing called evidence.) - https://www.androidcentral.com/list-every-ps5-game-supports-ray-tracing

The leaks can't be substantiated as of yet.

The AMD RDNA chips inside the Playstation 5 and Xbox Series X are great chips, their strengths however just don't lay with Ray Tracing as it's based on AMD's first attempt at implementing the technology, but that is okay.

They are powerful mid-range chips that are relatively cost-effective to produce, but their strengths lay with rasterization, even then some games will be 30fps because developers would rather push resolution and visuals over framerate, completely up to the developer.

Tegra is just stupidly energy efficient compared to AMD's APU's, but they are targeting different markets, cost, form factor and TDP's, I am actually excited to see how games perform and look on the latest chip, because we just don't see it being used often.

Some of the best games on Switch are 30fps experiences like... Breath of the Wild, Tears of the Kingdom, Luigi's Mansion 3, Xenoblade, Animal Crossing, Monster Hunter, Octopath, Links Awakening, Mario Odyssey and more, which are all 30fps experiences and sold amazingly well.

I think they'll be some sort of quality of life feature.

I imagine it acting like a media hub whilst docked, voice command turning it on, switching between apps, maybe a build in camera providing some unique gameplay capacity (translating your face into characters for mario kart or parts of a level) & taking some of the health features kinect 2 abandoned (being able to read heart beats etc) and tying it into a fitness title. A few mini games that don't require controls etc.

Whereas Switch felt a very simple device, I think Switch 2 will give a more modern tech impression whilst still being fun

Super Mario Odyssey runs at 60 fps.

Regardless of that, raytracing would lower the framerate and not provide any gameplay improvement to any of these games or their sequels. Making a specific type of game slightly more immersive is not worth implementing raytracing. It's drawbacks are a 100 times bigger than those that DLSS could have. DLSS can make games run and look better throughout. Raytracing only makes the lighting and shadows look better and needs way more powerful hardware. After like 10 minutes I'd literally stop noticing it.

Super Mario Odyssey runs at 60 fps.

Regardless of that, raytracing would lower the framerate and not provide any gameplay improvement to any of these games or their sequels. Making a specific type of game slightly more immersive is not worth implementing raytracing. It's drawbacks are a 100 times bigger than those that DLSS could have. DLSS can make games run and look better throughout. Raytracing only makes the lighting and shadows look better and needs way more powerful hardware. After like 10 minutes I'd literally stop noticing it.