I'm the opposite but only cause I like first-person view more, combat in Elder Scrolls is bad either way, Lol.

However, I'm exclusively third-person in Elder Scrolls Online, mainly because of the spells, easier to see the AOE.

Anyone know what the timer is that ResetEra uses sometimes for their countdowns?

Again, I don't know if I agree there. Sure Starfield will have a 3rd person option, but if it's anything like their previous games it will feel largely unusable due to a combination of poor player animations and the difficulty of targeting lootables on shelves and such in 3rd person camera (and I'm a loot whore in Bethesda games, so difficulty looting stuff in 3rd person was a total dealbreaker for me when I tried 3rd person in Fallout 4 and Fallout 76). Meanwhile every Arkane game I have ever played felt very exploration heavy, be it the Dishonored series or Deathloop (never played Prey or their older games like Arx Fatalis), I probably spent around half of my playtime in each of their previous games outside of combat since I favor stealth in their games and there is alot of nooks and crannies to search for loot. While Redfall might have a greater ratio of combat to exploration than Starfield, I don't know if that is accurate or not, I wouldn't be surprised if there are a good many enemies, be they animal or human, within Starfield's various planet open worlds, with the indoor sections of settlements obviously having alot of combat, just like Fallout 4 and Skyrim, nor would I be surprised if Redfall has as much exploration as Arkane's previous games (albeit with less stealth unless you choose to play as Jacob and take things slow).

It's also worth noting that these days I find 30 fps in first person exploration nearly as poor as 30 fps during first person combat as I can see the frame changes as I move my camera around while just exploring (I didn't used to be able to see that). After the previous generation where a good many games had 60 fps options (especially on the Pro consoles, which I used PS4 Pro the latter half of last gen), followed by a 3 year cross-gen period where most games were 60 fps on Series X/PS5, I feel like far too many of us core gamers have acclimated to 60 fps now to ever get used to 30 fps again. Devs going back down to 30 fps this gen to push graphics harder would be a big mistake imo. The casuals might not notice but alot of the core gamers are going to struggle with it. It's far too easy to offer both a graphics/fidelity mode and a framerate/performance mode these days for devs to not put in the work to offer at least those 2 options. There are some devs out there putting as many as 6 graphics modes into their games on console these days (we even have a few who have offered a partial suite of customizable graphics options, like a toned down level of of the customization you see on PC), the devs who don't at least offer the basic 2 modes of fidelity (30 fps) and performance (at least 45 fps for use on VRR screens, the closer to locked 60 fps the better) are going to look quite lazy in comparison to those devs who are willing to put in the work to offer lots of modes. 

40 FPS on a 120Hz display. Otherwise 30 FPS.

Gotta say I'm enjoying Ghostwire Tokyo so far. It's certainly not a top tier amazing game, but it's a tier or two below that in my eyes. Has some definite issues holding it back from being better than it is though:

• The shooting mechanics don't feel great, aiming feels somewhat clunky compared to most first person games I have played, though they do have an auto-aim option that allows you to partially lock-on to enemies while zoomed in which helps in this regard.
• The world traversal could be alot better, I've played open world games with far better traversal systems. The summonable tengu (grapple location) seems to be a late game upgrade, which greatly limits your ability to climb buildings for collectibles and spirits early on. The sprint speed feels painfully slow for an open world of this size and as far as I can tell there is no way to upgrade sprint speed (only crouch walk speed for stealth). Glide distance feels fairly poor even after I have the first 2 of 3 glide upgrades. Fast travel has a fairly low amount of locations available once you unlock it.
• Graphics are nothing to write home about, and performance is poor as well on several of the 6 different graphics modes
• There are far too many accessible areas on the map that have nothing in them, no collectibles, money, spirits, etc. 
• I can tell it will be a fairly grindy 1000 GS, spirit hunting in particular will take a long time, you have to recover 240,000 spirits and I only just hit 50,000 after 12 hours of playtime. There are also several other collectible types to search for which I have made even less progress on than spirits

However, on the plus side:

• The story in interesting so far
• Love the Shinjuku Tokyo setting
• The elemental magic spells are fun to use even if the actual aiming of them could be better, all of the hand sign weaving and the elemental natures makes you feel like a Naruto character which is cool
• The enemy designs are all cool
• Pretty good English voice cast
• The achievements are easy (though grindy), no missable achievements or difficulty level based achievements
• The horror bits really aren't that scary which is a plus for me as I skip the scary horror games

I could see my final score being around 8.5/10 assuming the story stays good and I don't get too bored of the grind

Think about it this way if core gamers already hate Redfall, nothing will change their minds until they actually play the game.  The thing about forming opinions on something before you actually have a chance to experience it is that most people never change their opinion once formed.  So if you have a negative opinion now, no amount of demo or delay is going to magically change those opinions.

I have seen enough footage to see how the game plays and anyone who is actually interested in the game probably have watch a number of videos not just IGN video.  If people watched the IGN video and thought the game is trash, they are already done with Redfall and will not waste their time watching anything else on the game.  If they have GP, they still will probably download and play the game out of curiosity especially if t gets solid reviews but that is the strength and weakness of GP.

I will confidently state that 60fps will not make or break this game because no matter the fps, if the game is not good and does not resonate with gamers it really does not matter if it runs at 60fps or 30fps.  If you are going to play the game whether you wait for the 60fps patch or play it at 30 on release that means you are still interested in the game.  The game will be on GP for the life of GP its audience is GP consumers so it cannot chase away anyone.  Its success is not determine by retail, its success is how many people download and play the game and since its not dependent on retail, its window is much longer than say a retail only game.  This is not a sprint, this is a marathon and the dynamics are different for a game whos purpose is to gain subs.  

You miss something very important about Cyberpunk and MCC, they were already good games with performance issues.  Hell, look at how many games that release with performance issues and sub par 60fps that still sell in the millions.  The reason is because they are still good games.  So for Redfall the biggest issue isn't 60fps or non online only mode.  The game needs to be fun to play first and foremost and no delay is going to help it for a couple months if that is not the case.

Sega Nears Deal For ‘Angry Birds’ Mobile Game Maker

Sega bout to go up in market value, I'm happy for em.