By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
 

After seeing the Direct and MP reveal, what's your hype for E-Day?

Already pre-ordered for e... 2 100.00%
 
Be there day one at the games launch 0 0%
 
Waiting to see how reviews look 0 0%
 
May pick it up on sale 0 0%
 
Still not interested (booooo) 0 0%
 
Total:2
JRPGfan said:
trunkswd said:

Microsoft was clearly hoping Game Pass would keep growing to like 100 million subscribers, which is unrealistic. We don't know how many subs there are, but after the last increase they lost millions of subs. I had Ultimate tier maxed out at 3 years before the last increase thanks to MS Rewards. That is now down to 2 years and a few months. Once it runs out I will probably switch to PC Game Pass. 

I could see them investing less in third-parties to help lower costs as they now have a steady stream of first-party games. 

At one point they reached like ~34m game pass subscriptions right? before the price hike. 
I wonder how many they lost due to the price increase.

JRPGfan said:
trunkswd said:

From Jason Schreier:

"Seeing a lot of misunderstanding about this. Profit margin is the percentage of revenue that is kept as profit. A 3% margin means that for every $100 you make, you're spending $97 and keeping $3. Margins don't reflect how much money you're making; they reflect how efficient the business is.

"A business with 3% margins could be making millions of dollars and doing totally fine. But if you're part of a company like Microsoft, which has divisions with 40%+ margins, then it's much harder to convince the bean-counters to keep making big investments in your biz"

Post by @jasonschreier.bsky.social — Bluesky

But that is a profit margin.....   She never says that, she said a "accountability margin".
I think there has to be a reason for that word use, instead of profit margin, or net profit or some such.

Game Pass topped 34 million in early 2024. That was before the first Call of Duty game was day and date on the service. It most likely grew more from that point, but I am thinking it never hit 40 million as I am sure they would have announced that number. 34 million was the last time we got an actual number. So who knows where it stands now. The positive is there is growth once again now that they lowered the price for the Ultimate and PC tiers. 

Oh yes you are right that he is talking profit margin. My bad on that. I am not sure the difference between that and accountability margin. 



VGChartz Sales Analyst and Writer - William D'Angelo - I stream on Twitch and have my own YouTube channel discussing gaming sales and news, as well as posting random gaming content. Follow me on Bluesky.

I post and adjust the VGChartz hardware estimates, with help from Machina.

Writer of the Sales Comparison | Monthly Hardware Breakdown Monthly Sales Analysis | Marketshare Features, as well as daily news on the Video Game Industry.

Around the Network

Yeah, you'd think Xbox going multiplat with all their first party releases would've been raking in money. It's been anything but.



You called down the thunder, now reap the whirlwind

'This is an Xbox' => Cool we don't need an Xbox anymore, so I can buy that xbox game on a competitor's platform => Only once $$$ for Xbox.

While that cometitor's platform gets initially > Smaller cut of the $$$ but will keep getting $$$ from online subscription; other games; accessoires etc.

Anyway not just Xbox should also be more active in their own catalog sales, 80% of Capcom games sold last year were old(er) catalog games...it is basically free money.






G2ThaUNiT said:

Yeah, you'd think Xbox going multiplat with all their first party releases would've been raking in money. It's been anything but.

Well Bethesda/Acti ports have always been on PS5 anyway so there's not going to be a revenue change there.

They've mainly only done late ports and the stuff that came day one like Outerworlds 2 underperformed everywhere. They've had a lot of software misses in general with Avowed/Hellblade 2 also performing poorly.

FH5 managed to reportedly sell over 5m copies on PS5 despite coming to the system over 3 years late though, probably made more on PS5 than all other XGS PS5 releases combined.



G2ThaUNiT said:

Yeah, you'd think Xbox going multiplat with all their first party releases would've been raking in money. It's been anything but.

The issue is the amount of studios they have.... game development is expensive.
This is development costs vs Game-pass effects.

Multi platform was like a band-aid that helped the bleeding.

The solution is obvious..... timed exclusives return.
Day and Date dies (gamepass games are offered after like 4-6months only, even xbox 1st party ones).

All the issues goes away.... if you grow your console hardware user base, and get them back to buying games.

(However we're mid a ram/storage crisis... its costly to grow a user base atm. Which again, points back to why Phil was going the other direction)



Around the Network

Fuck yes! After a 2 years wait Hi-Fi Xbox physical is finally shipping!



Bite my shiny metal cockpit!

Edit: ehh answered to an old post



"#2: We will end this fiscal year at about a 3% accountability margin, down year-over-year. Excluding Activision Blizzard King, over the past five years, we have spent over $20 billion on ongoing investments in our content, platform, and hardware subsidy, but our annual revenue has declined nearly half a billion during that time. Going forward, this cannot continue."

If your revenue is down half a billion "annually" for over 5 years....... does that mean $2.5 bn in total less revenue today, than 5 years ago?

And they pumped $20 bn into the console to try and improve things, but the end results are that the revenue line keeps going down year on year?

Holy hell.... She is dunking on Phil & Sara.



JRPGfan said:

"#2: We will end this fiscal year at about a 3% accountability margin, down year-over-year. Excluding Activision Blizzard King, over the past five years, we have spent over $20 billion on ongoing investments in our content, platform, and hardware subsidy, but our annual revenue has declined nearly half a billion during that time. Going forward, this cannot continue."

If your revenue is down half a billion "annually" for over 5 years....... does that mean $2.5 bn in total less revenue today, than 5 years ago?

And they pumped $20 bn into the console to try and improve things, but the end results are that the revenue line keeps going down year on year?

Holy hell.... She is dunking on Phil & Sara.

She kinda dunks on them even more on #3 on the hardware side of things. That Xbox pays more for components than competitors because of choices made over the past 5 years.

It's been numerously reported, but is also obvious in many regions where Xbox consoles are just no longer sold, that console shipments were intentionally scaled back to help improve profit margins and make Xbox more of a software-based business. Which on the surface, I can kinda see why Phil and Sarah came to that decision. Xbox has never made a profit on console sales in its entire 25-year history, which obviously brings down profit margins substantially. But at the same time, if you don't have enough consoles to sell, then no one can then buy them if they wanted to, where they could end up spending hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars on the platform.

And to make matters worse, Phil & co couldn't have predicted a global component shortage. So it created a perfect storm in a way as manufacturing was intentionally brought to a crawl, but then there's very little to nothing Asha can do currently to ramp manufacturing back up.



You called down the thunder, now reap the whirlwind

VersusEvil said:
shikamaru317 said:

Got a good laugh out of this one. Last I checked relationships are a 2 way street. Xbox has now given Sony 2 Forza games, a Halo game, a Gears game, so all 3 of their biggest franchises, plus a bunch of their smaller games, and they kept most Zenimax releases on Playstation even though they weren't required to. Sony has given them MLB: The Show because MLB was going to give the MLB game license to another publisher like 2K if they didn't, and Marathon only because Bungie requested no exclusivity as part of their acquisition deal. They have now even pulled their singleplayer games off of PC even though they were selling reasonably well, because there were reports that Project Helix would be able to play PC games.

Why should Sony give MS anything (outside of the contractual obligated ones), MS wasn’t putting games on PS out of the kindness of their heart it was coz you lot stopped buying em 😜 and you’d be pretty pissed off too if you had to re-edit your showcase at the last minute. They effectively lost two games from the showcase coz Halo was chosen over something else. 

Phil dreamed of a world without exclusivity from the very beginning, he talked about it years before day one Gamepass killed 1st party software sales. He did interviews talking about how he was forward thinking and that a future would exist without any exclusives. And to his credit, I think he actually believed that, and he put his money where is mouth was by giving away quite alot of exclusives. Sony and Nintendo did not reciprocate even a tiny bit. Phil had also convinced Microsoft's bean counters that it was a path to more money, which he was clearly wrong about, the extra revenue from ports wasn't enough to offset the decline in hardware or Gamepass subs, which I'm positive is why Phil retired and Sarah was let go. 

Last edited by shikamaru317 - on 12 June 2026