By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Which PSN+ Plan are you opting for?

axumblade said:
BraLoD said:

The basic, not upgrading at all.

What if they releases LoD as an exclusive for premium members? 

He would sub for PS+ Premium Dupper Topper for LoD.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network

Once I am done with Elden, I will cancel my auto renewal. Paying for online is complete and utter BS. And I have plenty of old game system, I don't need to pay for access.



Premium. I like streaming old PS3 games. My PS3 is officially packed away now so I need this even more.



Nobody's perfect. I aint nobody!!!

Killzone 2. its not a fps. it a FIRST PERSON WAR SIMULATOR!!!! ..The true PLAYSTATION 3 launch date and market dominations is SEP 1st

Chrkeller said:

Once I am done with Elden, I will cancel my auto renewal. Paying for online is complete and utter BS. And I have plenty of old game system, I don't need to pay for access.

Agree and Nintendo is the wrong direction, likewise Sony and Microsoft.

Games as service is bullshit ( good for consumers, but kneecap the company, Microsoft will be the only one capable of this in the long term run)

Now only pay Microsoft and Nintendo.  and one will down for me. 



Agente42 said:
Chrkeller said:

Once I am done with Elden, I will cancel my auto renewal. Paying for online is complete and utter BS. And I have plenty of old game system, I don't need to pay for access.

Agree and Nintendo is the wrong direction, likewise Sony and Microsoft.

Games as service is bullshit ( good for consumers, but kneecap the company, Microsoft will be the only one capable of this in the long term run)

Now only pay Microsoft and Nintendo.  and one will down for me. 

I pay for PSN when a new souls game is released, outside that I refuse to pay to play online.  It just limits the games I buy, like Monster Hunter.



Around the Network

I don't know to be honest.



It seems that my PS Plus and Now memberships will both expire at the end of this month. Money is tight so I will stick with an Essential membership for the time being. In the meantime I will clear out my backlog until I'm ready to play games from the Game Catalog and PS Classics.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1gWECYYOSo

Please Watch/Share this video so it gets shown in Hollywood.

Signalstar said:

It seems that my PS Plus and Now memberships will both expire at the end of this month. Money is tight so I will stick with an Essential membership for the time being. In the meantime I will clear out my backlog until I'm ready to play games from the Game Catalog and PS Classics.

There is a good chance on the months it take for you to upgrade some good titles are added to the classics.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

I will give Premium a try for a year, if not my cup of tea then go back to essential next year.



axumblade said:
DonFerrari said:

There is a good chance on the months it take for you to upgrade some good titles are added to the classics.

Yeah, I’ll be honest, I was wondering why it was missing a few games that seem obvious (Ratchet and Clank: Tools of Destruction, Resistance 1&2 etc) but at least I have other games to keep me occupied until they put them on there. 

The library from PS3 isn't bad, but the PS1,2,PSP is quite meager at the moment.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."