coolbeans said:
Might as well preface that Dune (book) is one of my favorite sci-fi scrolls of all-time. It's among a special few I read post-high school that I wished I'd read sooner. I was oftentimes warned about its sequels, but I want to carve out some time to go through all of them soon.
I came away genuinely impressed with the new movie. Although I thought 2049 was overrated, I still had faith in Villeneuve simply for being the first Dune director, would-be or actual director, to have actually read the fucking book beforehand. You can tell he loves the source material and yearned to make something Herbert would respect. The scenery, the sense of scale, the good practical/CGI blending (aside from that godawful suit fight in trailers), the effective exposition, how Zimmer's score was incorporated, and so on. Seeing this in IMAX was an absolute treat.
Naturally, it's not without issues. The editing and 'narrative framing' for...
Spoiler!
...Paul's first kill was unfocused. The weird quick cuts done to Jamis' yelling was so strange. Even the quick exposition of him not killing before could've been drilled into the audience earlier.
Also...
Spoiler!
There should've been stronger hints of Dr. Yueh's betrayal beforehand. Obviously some cuts would have to be made, but this is an important one I don't agree with. Having him spill the beans to Leto (especially in a low-volume whisper and slight accent) after he's done the deed is such a stale way to do it.
Even with those noteworthy criticisms, which could dampen the avg. moviegoer experience, I'm came away ecstatic that this was made. Can't wait for Part II.
8 or 8.5 Sardaukar Beatboxers / 10
|
Yueh really wasn't much of a character in the new movie, which I found a bit disappointing. I get that some things have to be cut, but I quite liked his character in the books, so I was disappointed that they didn't really do much with him.
For me, I loved the movie but it is hard to separate it from the books. Books are just naturally a better format for this story due to how much of them plays in thoughts and subtleties which you can do much more easily and cleanly in a book than a movie. That said, I find them to be really interesting companion pieces. The books add a lot of depth to the movie, while the movie provides a more straightforward picture of events with beautiful cinematography and solid acting. Part of me wishes I could watch the movie without having first read the book to judge it more objectively, but at the same time, I fully enjoyed both experiences (book and movie) so I suppose I can't complain.