curl-6 said:
It's not an either/or thing. There's nothing stopping them doing both. Sometimes companies, even the big successful ones, just make bad calls. |
Just because a company exists, even if it's unfathomably massive, doesn't mean they can do anything. In fact, once companies get that big, they always let off the gas and coast more eventually. Sometimes too much. Priorities also matter and tend to change. The bigger the company, the less likely they are going to go out of their way to please the audience like they used to, and much of the time they get away with it, which just makes things worse.
Could they make all that and more happen? Sure, but so could everyone else, and many don't. Everyone has choices to make and only so much time.
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.










