src said:
LudicrousSpeed said:
You’re claiming a generation would have been cartridge if not for Sony when Sony was literally the third console out that gen to not use cartridge. Like what are you even talking about? This doesn’t even take any real knowledge to dispel, just look at release dates.
Losing money on hardware at launch is normal and not even close to the point. I’ll give you a C+ for effort though. |
You clearly do not know video games history. CD vs Catridge was the biggest format war. It's what led Sony to form Playstation. Nintendo had a monopoly on the gaming market, if they went with cartridges, the industry would follow. Or are you naive enough to think the Saturn and 3DO would outsell the 64. We're not talking about launch, we're talking to date. Why don't you educate yourself first before rating other people's efforts? |
Nintendo had a monopoly? I don’t think you understand what that word means, lol. Also the PlayStation came about as a result of a failed partnership between Nintendo and Sony to make.. you guessed it, a CD based add on for the SNES.
Why do I care about Saturn sales versus N64? Saturn came out before PSone and was disc based. So your idea that Sony started a disc revolution in the fifth (?) gen is wrong.
Not sure why you’re harping on hardware profits, Sony and MS both eat hardware losses and launch and eventually start selling hardware for profits. Either way they make up more than enough to offset it via software and services. I assume you’re referencing the Apple vs Fortnite stuff, this was all explained clear as day in all the articles IIRC.
Dropping that grade to a D-