By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC Discussion - Potential leaked list of PlayStation first-party games coming to PC

Ljink96 said:


I don't think the games on the list mean they're sure fire PC releases but I'd imagine Sony wants to use PC as another way to bolster their sales and line their pockets.

But to do that, they're going to have to release said games at some point, not a decade or more after the gen is over each time they want to line their pockets.

They are slow, just like MS was multiple times they tried to get back into PC gaming, and now they are day and date. I imagine Sony will eventually reach that point in time as well (because drip feeding for decades upon decades sounds like a really retarded business idea to make money, when you could naturally improve like MS has and make money from both platforms near enough at the same time, instead of years and years later for a given amount of time). 



Around the Network
Chazore said:
Ljink96 said:


I don't think the games on the list mean they're sure fire PC releases but I'd imagine Sony wants to use PC as another way to bolster their sales and line their pockets.

But to do that, they're going to have to release said games at some point, not a decade or more after the gen is over each time they want to line their pockets.

They are slow, just like MS was multiple times they tried to get back into PC gaming, and now they are day and date. I imagine Sony will eventually reach that point in time as well (because drip feeding for decades upon decades sounds like a really retarded business idea to make money, when you could naturally improve like MS has and make money from both platforms near enough at the same time, instead of years and years later for a given amount of time). 

Yeah I think they'll start getting them out faster. The trick is finding the right time to release the games on PC after the bulk of sales have been made on PS4/PS5. Still thinking it'll still be at least a year or two though before PC ports. I feel Sony knows there are users who will buy the game on PlayStation and will buy it on PC as well if released later on and that nets them more in these cases than if everyone had choice earlier on between dedicated hardware and PC. 

That being said, I agree that Sony will eventually come around to day and date releases. Maybe new leadership changes recently are pointing to a more aggressive release strategy for Sony.

Nice sig btw, Jigen is the goat. 

Last edited by Ljink96 - on 24 September 2021

Chazore said:
DonFerrari said:

Well, you are free to believe they will put day one ports of GT7 and the like =p

It stops becoming a question of "if", but "when", with this new strategy of theirs. 

Sure it may happen at any given time. But already listed for something that may happen maybe in 4 or 5 years? This list looks more like what the person wants to happen or think will happen than that it is already firm with dates.

We could leak a list of games coming for Xbox and put Forza X, Forza Horizon Y, Halo Z, Gears of Wars W and say it is credible because they will all launch at some point, that doesn`t mean the list is really real.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Not sure why many are surprised. Sony clearly is heading towards simultaneous releases. Smart business. Only scale it back if competition is stiff and hardware success is in a questionable state.



Imagine believing Nintendo will ever put Bayo 3 and Mario on anything but a Nintendo platform.

Fake.



Around the Network
LurkerJ said:

Not sure why many are surprised. Sony clearly is heading towards simultaneous releases. Smart business. Only scale it back if competition is stiff and hardware success is in a questionable state.

Because the list isn`t credible. It isn`t a matter of Sony putting more games on PC, that is going to happen. The matter is listing of games that aren`t even announced and others that haven`t even released for PS5.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

DonFerrari said:

Sure it may happen at any given time. But already listed for something that may happen maybe in 4 or 5 years? This list looks more like what the person wants to happen or think will happen than that it is already firm with dates.

We could leak a list of games coming for Xbox and put Forza X, Forza Horizon Y, Halo Z, Gears of Wars W and say it is credible because they will all launch at some point, that doesn`t mean the list is really real.

The rest of the IP's on there that aren't Sony based are never likely to happen, but the ones that are Sony IP's are likely to happen within the next 3-4 years, but that doesn't automatically mean that Sony is just going to look at it's watch every 5 years and go "welp, time to release these perfectly timed 5 year gap exclusives", because that doesn't make sense when you're trying to tap into a new market. MS picked up their pace after some years and Sony is pretty much set to doing the same.

I don't think it's sane to include the total list that also includes Sony's and say it's not real, then a ew years those Sony games release on PC, which in the end makes the list real (besides the insanely obvious Nintendo part). It's just semantics at this point and a reach from those that don't want to see said games releasing at all. 



Chazore said:
DonFerrari said:

Sure it may happen at any given time. But already listed for something that may happen maybe in 4 or 5 years? This list looks more like what the person wants to happen or think will happen than that it is already firm with dates.

We could leak a list of games coming for Xbox and put Forza X, Forza Horizon Y, Halo Z, Gears of Wars W and say it is credible because they will all launch at some point, that doesn`t mean the list is really real.

The rest of the IP's on there that aren't Sony based are never likely to happen, but the ones that are Sony IP's are likely to happen within the next 3-4 years, but that doesn't automatically mean that Sony is just going to look at it's watch every 5 years and go "welp, time to release these perfectly timed 5 year gap exclusives", because that doesn't make sense when you're trying to tap into a new market. MS picked up their pace after some years and Sony is pretty much set to doing the same.

I don't think it's sane to include the total list that also includes Sony's and say it's not real, then a ew years those Sony games release on PC, which in the end makes the list real (besides the insanely obvious Nintendo part). It's just semantics at this point and a reach from those that don't want to see said games releasing at all. 

If a list have several non-credible IPs listed, be it Nintendo or other company, the list itself can't be said to be credible to say anything about leaks or some type of confirmation.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

DonFerrari said:

If a list have several non-credible IPs listed, be it Nintendo or other company, the list itself can't be said to be credible to say anything about leaks or some type of confirmation.

That's like saying because a flat earther puts in their own say into a list of other scientific sources (that are correct), then that entire list isn't viable (when the scientific sources are correct but the flat earther ones are not). 

The Sony releases are happening, the Nintendo ones are not, thus the list is credible for the Sony IP's. Putting all your stock into the Nintendo side of the list is wishful thinking. 



Random_Matt said:

Even shows Mario, all bs.

Kakadu18 said:

There is a Mario game and Bayonetta 3 on the list.

The whole thing is nonsense. Some of these games are very likely to never even release anywhere.

KManX89 said:

Imagine believing Nintendo will ever put Bayo 3 and Mario on anything but a Nintendo platform.

Fake.

Someone already mentioned it, but (most of) the Nintendo games are on there, because they were released on the Nvidia Shield in China.  It was part of a deal Nintendo had with Nvidia.  

https://www.nintendolife.com/news/2021/08/nvidia_shield_shutting_down_nintendo_wii_game_downloads_in_china


The list is real in the sense that it comes from Nvidia, and includes a lot of real games. 

It includes some cancelled games, some region specific titles, probably includes some test data, etc.  

So something being on the list might not mean much, but the list itself is very much credibly from Nvidia.