By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Is Skyward Sword HD worth $60?

Tagged games:

 

Has Skyward Sword HD been worth $60?

Yes 23 38.33%
 
No 33 55.00%
 
I'm not going to bother to find out 4 6.67%
 
Total:60
DitchPlaya said:

The reviews have been clear and its only going to go downhill from here. The Nintendo bump is finally coming to an end and it only took 30 years.



Around the Network
DitchPlaya said:

The reviews have been clear and its only going to go downhill from here. The Nintendo bump is finally coming to an end and it only took 30 years.

Is this a joke? Or serious? 



The public said YES!

And this is not the only chart it topped but it's the biggest market.



Link_Nines.XBC said:

The public said YES!

And this is not the only chart it topped but it's the biggest market.

Depressing chart position for The World Ends with You, the franchise is over



Conina said:
Dulfite said:

$60 in 1996 would be $104 today roughly. Many games were sold for more than $60 in 1996, some as high as $75-80 each in USA. So, $60 today would be at most $35 in 1996. Just for context.

Most ten year old games are sold for $1 - $20 today digitally, not for full price again. Just for context.

They wouldn't be if they had gamers willing to pay more. Plus, most of those 10 year old games don't have HD texture packs as well as a bunch of QoL features added with the relaunch.

If a company starts off with a premium price model that doesn't hardly diminish and its fans approve of it, it isn't their fault if other companies have to charge so little to sell after time has passed. If it was a problem, then consumers wouldn't buy the games and Nintendo would start lowering prices. The fact that they still does this tells us it isn't a problem and people just need to get over it.



Around the Network
IcaroRibeiro said:

Depressing chart position for The World Ends with You, the franchise is over

While the game is inherently niche, it doesn't help that Square-Enix barely marketed it, they didn't even show it at their E3 presentation, it wouldn't have hurt them to take a few of the 20 minutes they used to show Guardians of the Galaxy to promote TWEWY. A marketing deal with Nintendo would've been a good idea too (like how Nintendo promoted Octopath Traveler and the Dragon Quest games), though I guess that would've been possible only if the game was exclusive to the Switch.

OT: People are willing to pay full price for Nintendo games.



Link_Nines.XBC said:

The public said YES!

And this is not the only chart it topped but it's the biggest market.

Because as often the case people reward mediocrity and want the same shit over and over. Neo The World Ends With You is better than some of games on that list and feels very fresh. Def better than SS. People rarely want imaginative and new. They want more of the same as always.

Last edited by Leynos - on 15 August 2021

Bite my shiny metal cockpit!

Leynos said:
mZuzek said:

Yeah, we get it, linear games are trash.

Jeez.

Nah. Just depends on the type of game. I would not want Devil May Cry to become the open world. Nex Machina or old arcade side scrollers. Some RPGs do better being linear to help the pacing of their story. Grandia II or The World Ends with You. Where Xenoblade works better in large worlds. Some games work in both like Strider. I love the arcade original and my fave game in the series Strider 2 on PS1. I also loved the Strider game on PS3 that was Metroidvania much like the NES game. I just feel Zelda began as an exploration game and it fits best with the series.

agreed



Of course, I also agree it's not Nintendo faults third parties lose their value fast, and neither I should think they should lower their profit prices albeit I would be happy if they choose to do. But this condescending tone Nintendo stans use to diminish third party games value (as it they were somewhat linked to lack of lasting quality) is quite annoying

Nintendo does not lower the prices no matter how much their software is selling. Is anybody talking about Arms? Astral Chain? DK Tropical Freeze? Captain Toad? Xenoblade 2? Mario Tennis Ace? All those games stopped selling for sometime and still are not getting discounted. They won't get discounted, because this goes against Nintendo software strategy

Third parties are using mass market strategy (lower prices, many paid content, bigger but treacheous userbase, impulse-buy), while Nintendo is using premium price strategy (fewer DLC, fewer paid content, full prices, small but loyal fandom). Nintendo can afford it, they have many famous IPs, a loyal fandom, many good in-house development teams and overall their games are less costly to develop meaning they break even faster. I guess only MS and Sony could compete on premium price strategy, but well MS software has been deemed are uneventful, while Sony is trying to change it making their 1st party more and more compelling but were overall dirty cheap on PS4, guess this gonna change on PS5 now their IPs are stronger



Link_Nines.XBC said:
IcaroRibeiro said:

Depressing chart position for The World Ends with You, the franchise is over

While the game is inherently niche, it doesn't help that Square-Enix barely marketed it, they didn't even show it at their E3 presentation, it wouldn't have hurt them to take a few of the 20 minutes they used to show Guardians of the Galaxy to promote TWEWY. A marketing deal with Nintendo would've been a good idea too (like how Nintendo promoted Octopath Traveler and the Dragon Quest games), though I guess that would've been possible only if the game was exclusive to the Switch.

OT: People are willing to pay full price for Nintendo games.

I think the problem is Enix tried to sell it like a Nintendo game, but isn't really like a Nintendo game. The original game still full price after all those years, a DS game I must to point out, a hardware that used to struggle to run N64 games. If you have a 15 years old game with no sequel and make the said game not-accessible (i.e. expensive, released only on DS and Switch) it's hard to build a enduring appeal and a steady fanbase

And yeah I agree the market was pretty bad. I'm all for all games to be released in as much system as possible but PS4 version flopped really hard on Famitsu, the original game was never released on Playstation and mostly likely the people who played the original on DS went for Switch