Kakadu18 said:
You should blame the retailer for selling the game for $20 more than standard price, not Nintendo. |
I'm blaming Nintendo for not releasing their games physically, so I need to import them or buy on grey market
Kakadu18 said:
You should blame the retailer for selling the game for $20 more than standard price, not Nintendo. |
I'm blaming Nintendo for not releasing their games physically, so I need to import them or buy on grey market
IcaroRibeiro said:
I'm blaming Nintendo for not releasing their games physically, so I need to import them or buy on grey market |
Oh right, that is an issue. They loose out on many customers like that.
| SvennoJ said: I just spend $15 on getting my kids and myself an ice cream cone, complaining about a $10 fee for actual enhancements is rather ridiculous imo. But you can indeed just play it on ps4, the choice is there to be taken. |
It's not the amount, it's the precedent of thinking, "well, we're doing so good, and the PS5 is selling great... so we're going to put a premium $10 tax on everything PS5!". Greed is an awful thing, and companies have this tendency to only push prices up when they're the market leader already making the most money. This is virtually the universal complaint/concern: I haven't really seen anyone say that $10 makes it unaffordable lol
Hynad said:
My definition of authenticity is being genuine, true, not fake… It has nothing to so with what you said. As for the rest, through your replies in the various topics you created here, you have shown to be someone who will continually self-pat himself and condescendingly act as if you know better and more than those who take part in the discussions, so I won’t push this much further other than to point out that you display many traits of narcissism. |
Funny thing: the vast majority of people who point out narcissism are usually the most narcissistic. It's as if finding it in others reduces the self-impression.
| Azzanation said: What have you done ZyroXZ2 You shaken up the hive. You know you cannot post an opinion unless you open your wallet and give everything to their favorite companies and agree with all their business practices. These people don't see the principle, they only see the low price point and think its a good deal not knowingly understand that it shouldn't exist in the first place. Its really simple to see, PS5 owners have to pay for features they brought the system for, otherwise they get stuck with the PS4 experience. They clearly don't see the issue here and think its only $10. When this starts to become a standard across the business they will see the flaws in their logic. I should pay MS an extra $1 for implementing the Share button on older games on the new Controller. That's how i see the defenders on this topic. Keep doing what you are doing Zyro, we need more opinions outside the professional industry. |
Agreed, I keep seeing people say, "it's just $10", and "get a job" and other poor shaming (which is ALSO a wrong thing to do, I never make fun of someone who, for example, can only afford one console, or just a Switch Lite or something!). I sometimes think "money sense" is just as uncommon as "common sense" lmfao... Some people I know have more money than others simply because they spend less, not even because they make more... Hilarious how that works ![]()
LurkerJ said:
Well, stating buying a car is a lot more complex doesn't mean much if you just go ahead and continue comparing them anyway. It's not remotely comparable, and as I mentioned, I am not gonna race to the bottom just to convince you otherwise. As for criticising your name, it wasn't an attempt to put you down or anything. As I mentioned, if your infamous review is anything to go by, it's only a matter of time before you're "discovered". Fyi, I thought Xbox 360 and Xbox one were stupid names, I don't mind Xbox series sounds like a step up to me, series S & X can only mean there will be Y & Z sooner than later, a great way to differentiate how powerful Xboxes are without needlessly throwing around the Pro moniker. Can you not change your xbox/PSN name? just wondering. |
Oh I know you weren't, I'm agreeing because you're not only not the first to mention this to me (and I include real life examples in this lol), but I already knew the name was arbitrary because it had to be. In the old days, it was just "Zyro", but you can imagine that someone beat me to the punch as time went on and I couldn't use it anymore. Queue not-entirely-but-mostly random add-ons, and THEN queue me also using that for my PSN username which for the longest time could not be changed. I had a PS3 before an Xbox One, so eventually I just had to keep using it or risk having slightly different usernames here and there. Eventually it just kept going because there was no point in changing it for Ubisoft Connect, or EA Desktop (called different things before), or Epic Games Launcher, etc. etc. I'm fully aware it's absolutely garbage to most eyes, a string of nonsense, but the consistency is what I'm currently banking on and changing it now would be... well... kind of rough, no? ![]()
And for the record, like in other threads, I'm very open to constructive criticism, it's just that when October hits, I'll have been doing gaming for four years (makes me sad when I realize how small I still am!) and have seen/heard the vast majority of things people tell me about my channel lmao
ZyroXZ2 said:
It's not the amount, it's the precedent of thinking, "well, we're doing so good, and the PS5 is selling great... so we're going to put a premium $10 tax on everything PS5!". Greed is an awful thing, and companies have this tendency to only push prices up when they're the market leader already making the most money. This is virtually the universal complaint/concern: I haven't really seen anyone say that $10 makes it unaffordable lol |
It's not a premium tax. I'm paying for the same ice cream as in 2000, except now it's nearly twice as expensive.
$50 in 2000 currently amounts to $78
It's not greed, it's inflation.
It's also not greed to charge for actual work having been done.
They're not charging for BC, the charge is for the extras.
Governments have the tendency to devalue money over time.
ZyroXZ2 said:
Funny thing: the vast majority of people who point out narcissism are usually the most narcissistic. It's as if finding it in others reduces the self-impression. |
Even funnier, narcissists don’t see, let alone admit, their flaws, and act exactly as you just did. This kind of pre-conceived go-to reply you just used is no surprise.
So forget I said anything. You can’t take any negative comments about anything you say or do. So go about your rainbow and continue to think your review skits are good.
Last edited by Hynad - on 24 July 2021Hynad said:
Even funnier, narcissists don’t see, let alone admit, their flaws, and act exactly as you just did. This kind of pre-conceived go-to reply you just used is no surprise. So forget I said anything. You can’t take any negative comments about anything you say or do. So go about your rainbow and continue to think your review skits are good. |
Irony, you should look it up.
Remember, even the people in this thread who disagree with me or against me are staying on the topic of the thread and video: you made it personal and went for me instead. This might surprise you, but to adults, this speaks volumes about the kind of person you are.
ZyroXZ2 said:
Irony, you should look it up. Remember, even the people in this thread who disagree with me or against me are staying on the topic of the thread and video: you made it personal and went for me instead. This might surprise you, but to adults, this speaks volumes about the kind of person you are. |
You keep reinforcing how spot-on I was.
?
But here, I’ll give you what you want: “What a good and funny review format you chose for yourself. So clever and imaginative! There’s really nothing I can imagine you could do to be better! So, so good!”
Last edited by Hynad - on 27 July 2021I do find the $10 price for upgrading to PS5 version greedy.
The DLC will be worth it.
But I’m fine since I know In about 1-2 years, the PS5 version will be dirt cheap.
The upgrades seems to be depending on the studio and in this case Sony is banking on the success of the game, they will do a similar with TLOU part II, either with a compilation or just a directors cut of part II.
I would be extremely worried if it was in another console whose deluxe remaster editions are still full price after 4 years.
At least I can spend just $10 to upgrade my PS4 version to PS5, instead of already paying $60 for the PS4 copy, then $20 for the DLC expansion, then another $70 for the PS5 directors cut.
Having to repurhase a PS3 game on PS4, remastered or not, first party or not, was a much less convenient option. SNY is clearly headed in the right direction here.
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.
SvennoJ said:
It's not a premium tax. I'm paying for the same ice cream as in 2000, except now it's nearly twice as expensive. |
Inflation is a tricky area because it's not linear: there's socio-economic value that has to be accounted for. In other words, if the dollar is suddenly worth half, the price of goods would not simply double to maintain the same "value". This is WAYYY too big of a topic to bring up here, but inflation is not as simple as people make it out to be, not that the cost of living (at least here in America in more tech focused cities) hasn't vastly outpaced minimum wage in large part due to inflation... lol
Hynad said:
You keep reinforcing how spot-on I was. 👠But here, I’ll give you what you want: “What a good and funny review format you chose for yourself. So clever and imaginative! There’s really nothing I can imagine you could do to be better! So, so good!” |
You really are proving you only see/hear what you want to... As if no one criticizes or disagrees in which, unlike you, I've proven I'm willing to have civil discourse.
"You suck, you're bad, cringe" is not civil discourse. That is why my responses to you are short: conversation with you is impossible because you simply do not like me but lack the ability and honesty to state it and move on.