By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - Will Switch outsell DS? PS2? Or neither?

 

Will Switch outsell PS2 and/or DS?

Yes, it will outsell PS2's (~159Million) 100 57.47%
 
Will outsell the DS, but not the PS2 74 42.53%
 
Switch will fall short of both DS & PS2 0 0%
 
Total:174
Shadow1980 said:
Eagle367 said:

This comment is a bit disingenuous as this year (2021), the switch is outselling the best year of the DS so far. It has sold at least 29mil in the fiscal year 2020-21 as well. That's close to the best year of the DS but less. And if does the same in 2021-22, it has a decent shot at having better legs than the DS. It's neck and neck with the DS, but you are making it seem like the switch currently seems to have no chance of outselling the DS.

And the pandemic is only one factor, the appeal of the switch is there with or without the pandemic. 25mil+ was pretty much always a possibility without the pandemic, maybe even 27mil+. It's hard to judge how much the pandemic helped because on the other hand, people had less discretionary spending as well. There was certainly a net positive effect in terms of sales, but it's not as clear cut and due to that reason alone. Simple fact is it's legs. 2021 is looking like another strong year, maybe even the best console year ever and certainly the top 3. 2022-24 will tell the actual story. It has a much higher chance than your post suggests.

Missed this one because I had my prior reply sitting unfinished since yesterday afternoon.

The Switch is not outselling the DS's best year, either globally or any specific region. And we need to look at things on a region-by-region basis.

In the U.S., the Switch did have a strong lead over the DS initially, but that's because the DS had a slow start. The Switch's lead over it has been declining since 2019, and has since turned into a deficit. The DS leads now in the U.S., and that lead will grow. There's no way in hell the Switch is going to be able to sell what it needs to sell to regain the lead over the next two years. The DS sold 19.75M units in the U.S. between 2011 and 2012. The Switch will need to keep going at 2020 levels for at least two more years just to avoid growing its deficit against the DS. Realistically, it's going to be running a deficit against the DS of over 3M units by the end of this year, and that's not including the DS's launch holiday (I'm just counting the DS's 2005-2009 in relation to the Switch's 2017-2021). That deficit is almost certainly going to grow even more next year, considering the DS sold 8.56M in 2011, nearly as much as the Switch did last year, probably more than it'll sell this year, and undoubtedly more than it'll sell next year (do you really expect three consecutive years of 8-9M units?). The only chance the Switch has of matching the DS in the U.S. is if its sales in 2023 and later are close to double what the DS's were in 2012 & later. That's not going to happen unless the Switch's successor doesn't come out until late 2025 or 2026.

In Japan, the DS peaked earlier than in the U.S., but what a peak it was. It sold 15.8M in the 2007-08 period, by far the best two-year period of any system ever in Japan. Like, nothing else was even close. The DS currently has a very significant lead over the Switch (and that's again not counting the DS's 2004 sales). The Switch will need to sell at least another 13.5M units in Japan just to tie the DS. That's actually possible, and the Switch's best odds of beating the DS in any one region is definitely Japan. But if it starts to slow down any next year, those odds diminish greatly.

In Europe, well, good God man, just look at the numbers. The Switch isn't even in the same league sales-wise as the DS was.

And if you think the Switch would be selling as well as it has over the past year without the pandemic, then you haven't been paying attention. Since at least this past summer, I've spent considerable time and effort in other threads going over this subject, with more than ample data to back up my arguments. I will not reiterate myself here, I will not argue over this subject anymore, and I'm just going to start ignoring people that simply object for the sake of objecting (i.e., not providing any backing evidence). If people can't deal with the facts, that's their problem, not mine.

Matedo you even read the weekly sales thread? There's literally a guy that is tracking week by week sales nd switch is outselling every console YTD.



Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also

Around the Network
Shadow1980 said:
Eagle367 said:

This comment is a bit disingenuous as this year (2021), the switch is outselling the best year of the DS so far. It has sold at least 29mil in the fiscal year 2020-21 as well. That's close to the best year of the DS but less. And if does the same in 2021-22, it has a decent shot at having better legs than the DS. It's neck and neck with the DS, but you are making it seem like the switch currently seems to have no chance of outselling the DS.

And the pandemic is only one factor, the appeal of the switch is there with or without the pandemic. 25mil+ was pretty much always a possibility without the pandemic, maybe even 27mil+. It's hard to judge how much the pandemic helped because on the other hand, people had less discretionary spending as well. There was certainly a net positive effect in terms of sales, but it's not as clear cut and due to that reason alone. Simple fact is it's legs. 2021 is looking like another strong year, maybe even the best console year ever and certainly the top 3. 2022-24 will tell the actual story. It has a much higher chance than your post suggests.

Missed this one because I had my prior reply sitting unfinished since yesterday afternoon.

The Switch is not outselling the DS's best year, either globally or any specific region. And we need to look at things on a region-by-region basis.

In the U.S., the Switch did have a strong lead over the DS initially, but that's because the DS had a slow start. The Switch's lead over it has been declining since 2019, and has since turned into a deficit. The DS leads now in the U.S., and that lead will grow. There's no way in hell the Switch is going to be able to sell what it needs to sell to regain the lead over the next two years. The DS sold 19.75M units in the U.S. between 2011 and 2012. The Switch will need to keep going at 2020 levels for at least two more years just to avoid growing its deficit against the DS. Realistically, it's going to be running a deficit against the DS of over 3M units by the end of this year, and that's not including the DS's launch holiday (I'm just counting the DS's 2005-2009 in relation to the Switch's 2017-2021). That deficit is almost certainly going to grow even more next year, considering the DS sold 8.56M in 2011, nearly as much as the Switch did last year, probably more than it'll sell this year, and undoubtedly more than it'll sell next year (do you really expect three consecutive years of 8-9M units?). The only chance the Switch has of matching the DS in the U.S. is if its sales in 2023 and later are close to double what the DS's were in 2012 & later. That's not going to happen unless the Switch's successor doesn't come out until late 2025 or 2026.

In Japan, the DS peaked earlier than in the U.S., but what a peak it was. It sold 15.8M in the 2007-08 period, by far the best two-year period of any system ever in Japan. Like, nothing else was even close. The DS currently has a very significant lead over the Switch (and that's again not counting the DS's 2004 sales). The Switch will need to sell at least another 13.5M units in Japan just to tie the DS. That's actually possible, and the Switch's best odds of beating the DS in any one region is definitely Japan. But if it starts to slow down any next year, those odds diminish greatly.

In Europe, well, good God man, just look at the numbers. The Switch isn't even in the same league sales-wise as the DS was.

And if you think the Switch would be selling as well as it has over the past year without the pandemic, then you haven't been paying attention. Since at least this past summer, I've spent considerable time and effort in other threads going over this subject, with more than ample data to back up my arguments. I will not reiterate myself here, I will not argue over this subject anymore, and I'm just going to start ignoring people that simply object for the sake of objecting (i.e., not providing any backing evidence). If people can't deal with the facts, that's their problem, not mine.

One could easily use that data to argue that the pandemic hurt the Switch more than it helped it's sales with the major disruption of supply chains/manufacturing. We will never know how much success Animal Crossing could have had without the pandemic. What if it was still the same global sensation it was but without constraints on supply chains/manufacturing?

The argument loses more steam as we look at the data of this year as the sales are still growing even though everything should be pointing to major downward trends according to your assumptions (no major global phenomenon in gaming, new gaming generation, vaccines, less travel restrictions, etc.).

Last edited by scottslater - on 26 April 2021

Nintendo with the Switch:

scottslater said:
Shadow1980 said:

Missed this one because I had my prior reply sitting unfinished since yesterday afternoon.

The Switch is not outselling the DS's best year, either globally or any specific region. And we need to look at things on a region-by-region basis.

In the U.S., the Switch did have a strong lead over the DS initially, but that's because the DS had a slow start. The Switch's lead over it has been declining since 2019, and has since turned into a deficit. The DS leads now in the U.S., and that lead will grow. There's no way in hell the Switch is going to be able to sell what it needs to sell to regain the lead over the next two years. The DS sold 19.75M units in the U.S. between 2011 and 2012. The Switch will need to keep going at 2020 levels for at least two more years just to avoid growing its deficit against the DS. Realistically, it's going to be running a deficit against the DS of over 3M units by the end of this year, and that's not including the DS's launch holiday (I'm just counting the DS's 2005-2009 in relation to the Switch's 2017-2021). That deficit is almost certainly going to grow even more next year, considering the DS sold 8.56M in 2011, nearly as much as the Switch did last year, probably more than it'll sell this year, and undoubtedly more than it'll sell next year (do you really expect three consecutive years of 8-9M units?). The only chance the Switch has of matching the DS in the U.S. is if its sales in 2023 and later are close to double what the DS's were in 2012 & later. That's not going to happen unless the Switch's successor doesn't come out until late 2025 or 2026.

In Japan, the DS peaked earlier than in the U.S., but what a peak it was. It sold 15.8M in the 2007-08 period, by far the best two-year period of any system ever in Japan. Like, nothing else was even close. The DS currently has a very significant lead over the Switch (and that's again not counting the DS's 2004 sales). The Switch will need to sell at least another 13.5M units in Japan just to tie the DS. That's actually possible, and the Switch's best odds of beating the DS in any one region is definitely Japan. But if it starts to slow down any next year, those odds diminish greatly.

In Europe, well, good God man, just look at the numbers. The Switch isn't even in the same league sales-wise as the DS was.

And if you think the Switch would be selling as well as it has over the past year without the pandemic, then you haven't been paying attention. Since at least this past summer, I've spent considerable time and effort in other threads going over this subject, with more than ample data to back up my arguments. I will not reiterate myself here, I will not argue over this subject anymore, and I'm just going to start ignoring people that simply object for the sake of objecting (i.e., not providing any backing evidence). If people can't deal with the facts, that's their problem, not mine.

One could easily use that data to argue that the pandemic hurt the Switch more than it helped it's sales with the major disruption of supply chains/manufacturing. We will never know how much success Animal Crossing could have had without the pandemic. What if it was still the same global sensation it was but without constraints on supply chains/manufacturing?

The argument loses more steam as we look at the data of this year as the sales are still growing even though everything should be pointing to major downward trends according to your assumptions (no major global phenomenon in gaming, new gaming generation, vaccines, less travel restrictions, etc.).

Yeah, that's the whole point of everyone's argumentation (what he's referring to "not providing any backing evidence")



SKMBlake said:
scottslater said:

One could easily use that data to argue that the pandemic hurt the Switch more than it helped it's sales with the major disruption of supply chains/manufacturing. We will never know how much success Animal Crossing could have had without the pandemic. What if it was still the same global sensation it was but without constraints on supply chains/manufacturing?

The argument loses more steam as we look at the data of this year as the sales are still growing even though everything should be pointing to major downward trends according to your assumptions (no major global phenomenon in gaming, new gaming generation, vaccines, less travel restrictions, etc.).

Yeah, that's the whole point of everyone's argumentation (what he's referring to "not providing any backing evidence")

Yeah, I'm aware. At this point the argument that the Pandemic is why the Switch is growing just doesn't hold steam as well as it did a year ago. I agree that it helped it clear the shelves early on, but at a certain point we need to look at the real possibility that it is hurting more than helping, just like it is hurting the PS5/XsX.



Nintendo with the Switch:

Mandalore76 said:
Illusion said:

I think that you hit the nail on the head.

If Nintendo ends up releasing a Switch Pro that has all the bells and whistles that we are hoping for such as DLSS and a significantly improved screen, then there is no question that 150M will be easily passed by the Switch and I even believe that 200M is realistic target.  That bigger question we need to ask as a community in this case, though, is whether this counts as a new console or is a refresh similar to what the New 3DS was.  Is backwards compatibility and a similar name and form factor enough to consider two pieces of hardware to be the same console generation even if the hardware capabilities are radically different?  The New3DS was not that much faster than the 3DS and a lot of people who had a 3DS did not re-purchase a New 3DS, but if the Switch Pro ends up using DLSS and is capable of 4K resolution then this puts it in new generation ballpark and a lot of people are going to want to have both models.

The question here comes down to a logistical one.  The momentum that the Switch currently has will land it somewhere close to 150M assuming that Nintendo does absolutely nothing in terms of hardware releases over the next 5 years, but this is highly unlikely in my opinion.  If Nintendo releases a vastly improved Switch pro in the next 1-2 years, then this will decimate the original Switch sales (maybe it peaks at 110-130M) but the new model is probably going to explode, especially if it is good as the rumors are suggesting right now.  In this case, it will come down to whether we consider the new Switch model a part of the original Switch generation.  In my opinion, if a ton of people are rebuying the Switch Pro for the radical enhancements it has then it doesn't seem fair to Microsoft and Sony in the console wars to continue adding up Switch sales.

So, we are counting the Pro model sales of PS4 Pro and XBox One X into the PS4 base and XBox One base sales.  But, in fairness to Microsoft and Sony, we should not count the sales of a Switch Pro with the base model Switch sales.  I'm "fairly" certain you didn't use the word "fair" correctly in your statement.

I almost died from reading this



Around the Network
tbone51 said:
Mandalore76 said:

So, we are counting the Pro model sales of PS4 Pro and XBox One X into the PS4 base and XBox One base sales.  But, in fairness to Microsoft and Sony, we should not count the sales of a Switch Pro with the base model Switch sales.  I'm "fairly" certain you didn't use the word "fair" correctly in your statement.

I almost died from reading this

So, if the Switch Pro turns out to be a greater power upgrade compared to the Wii U going to Switch and with a completely different graphics engine compared to that of the OG Switch, you think that it is laugh-worthy to even debate whether this constitutes a new generation?

I could care less about being "fair" to Microsoft and Sony.  The numbers on the front of this website eventually become meaningless if we have no criteria for what constitutes a new generation.  If the Switch Pro is 4K with DLSS and releases 5 years after the original Switch, I have no idea why wouldn't consider this a new generation the same way we did going from Wii to Wii U.



Illusion said:
tbone51 said:

I almost died from reading this

So, if the Switch Pro turns out to be a greater power upgrade compared to the Wii U going to Switch and with a completely different graphics engine compared to that of the OG Switch, you think that it is laugh-worthy to even debate whether this constitutes a new generation?

I could care less about being "fair" to Microsoft and Sony.  The numbers on the front of this website eventually become meaningless if we have no criteria for what constitutes a new generation.  If the Switch Pro is 4K with DLSS and releases 5 years after the original Switch, I have no idea why wouldn't consider this a new generation the same way we did going from Wii to Wii U.

Power jump really doesn’t mean much, if it is that then in means NSW pro is the biggest hardware revision leap, just like x1x/ps4pro before it. 

if it’s the same thing as NSW but just more powerful it’s a NSW. Sane controllers/software (even if done exclusivel), philosophy, architecture, etc.

only way your right is if it comes off as a successor to nsw, but I highly doubt it is considereingvthe system suppose to launch this year while NSW has Splat3/Pokémon arceus coming in 2022



Illusion said:
tbone51 said:

I almost died from reading this

So, if the Switch Pro turns out to be a greater power upgrade compared to the Wii U going to Switch and with a completely different graphics engine compared to that of the OG Switch, you think that it is laugh-worthy to even debate whether this constitutes a new generation?

I could care less about being "fair" to Microsoft and Sony.  The numbers on the front of this website eventually become meaningless if we have no criteria for what constitutes a new generation.  If the Switch Pro is 4K with DLSS and releases 5 years after the original Switch, I have no idea why wouldn't consider this a new generation the same way we did going from Wii to Wii U.

So Xbox One X, the huge leap in power compared to Xbox One, is okay to be considered same gen?



tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"

Switch is capable of surpassing the PS2 but it's up to how Nintendo handles the console. What they should do in the mid and long term to surpass the PS2 is:

1 - Price cuts (not now, in the future).
2 - New Pro model
3 - Have Switch 2 launch in 2025 instead of 2023 or 2024.
4 - Have a strong 2022 in terms of software. That year will be critical. Nintendo won't want another "cliff year" like with the Wii.



Shadow1980 said:
Bofferbrauer2 said:

The way it's selling right now, I don't see how it could stop at 130M. 140M+ is pretty much guaranteed by now.

And I've made it clear that the way it's selling now is not due to normal sales growth.

And we're getting tired to point out that Covid ain't the reason of those sales. If Covid would have had such a big impact on Switch sales, then sales would already have fallen down a cliff, but instead sales are up from last year despite the smash hit that was AC:NH, whose effect you constantly seem to underestimate.  

Shadow1980 said:
Bofferbrauer2 said:

Here's your first problem: You're forgetting RoW.

The PS2 beat the DS because the latter wasn't doing nearly as well as the former did in those regions. But the Switch is already close to surpassing the DS in total sales in those regions and if it continues selling the way it did last year, could even beat the PS2 in total sales over there.

In Europe the Switch will not beat the PS2, that is clear. But from what I heard around here, it's mostly due to the price; most find the Switch simply too expensive for a secondary console (aka a non-Fifa console). A pricecut could do wonders to the sales in Europe if that's true for more than just the people I talked to, and I'm fairly sure it is. As a result, the final tally in Europe will be smaller than you seem to anticipate

As of the end of 2020, there were 9.11M units shipped to markets outside the main three, less than half of what it had sold in Japan or Europe by that point. Even if it doubles that, it won't be enough to top PS2 sales outside the main three regions (~25M units). The Switch will definitely have a solid lead over the PS2 in Japan, and possibly a lead over the PS2 in North America, but it's likely going to fall well short of the PS2 outside those two regions. Even if the Switch hits, say, 55M in North America and 30M in Japan, it would still need 73M from Europe and RoW, well over double what current sales are.

Europe and RoW are glaring weak points in the Switch's chances of beating the PS2 globally. Nintendo will have to find some way to keep sales going at current levels until at least the end of 2023, and probably need to actually grow them in that span. I really don't see any possible scenario where that could happen, especially considering that the Switch's sales levels over the past 13 months are not due to normal sales growth.

9.11? I think you're a couple months short, otherwise Nintendo would have sold (not shipped, sold!) over 2M already this year, as it's currently sitting at 11.11M sold in our charts here. And you're missing something: The fact that in 2020 Nintendo sold more Switch consoles in the RoW than they did in 2017-2019 combined. Nintendo actually sold more than 5M Switch consoles to RoW in 2020 and will easily get to 15M+ this year. And just look at last week: If you add all together RoW is sitting at over 60k for the week. That's not that far from what the XS is selling every week right now.

And I seem you didn't understand why I mentioned RoW. The DS lost against the PS2 because of it's weakness in that region. But the Switch will overtake the DS this summer over there and will not be far off the PS2 when all is said and done. So it all comes down to US +JP for the Switch vs EU for the PS2.

Shadow1980 said:

Given these facts, I don't see any reason to assume that the Switch Pro will cause some massive surge in Switch sales lasting many months. I mean, what are some people really expecting it to do? Keep the Switch going at current levels in 2023 and beyond?

Why oh why current levels until 2023? And then even beyond?

If the Switch pulls the current numbers until the end of next year, it will already sit at ~140M. From there, it would need to drop waaaaaaaaaaayyyy harder than the Wii ever did to not pass the PS2.

I think you misread the situation a bit. A switch "pro" or whatever refresh would come shouldn't push hardware sales higher - keeping them cruising at current speed and avoiding sales to drop off would be more than enough to keep the Switch going.