By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Bloomberg: New Nvidia GPU For New Switch, 4K DLSS Graphics + Better CPU + More RAM

Jumpin on 14 April 2021
mjk45 said:
Jumpin said:

Considering the significant unlikelihood that there’s a conspiracy impacting the sources - that Nintendo lied to devs and people in the know, or that the people familiar with the matter and developers all conspired to fool Bloomberg - there really is only two options for the accuracy or inaccuracy of the report: Bloomberg is lying or they aren’t.

We seen this before where leaked sources have been wrong and also the opposite it's why they are called rumours, now if someone doesn't believe a certain leak with no verifiable source doesn't mean they are accusing the publisher of lying,and this is because it was stated as a rumour and not fact, so what you would be doing is making a judgment based on how you perceive the strength of the rumour nothing more , to accuse them of lying you would need to go further than just not believing that rumour. 

This isn’t EvilMetalDave’s YouTube channel or 1UpNintendoFansite.Com looking for cheap site hits. This is Bloomberg, people pay money to access their content. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloomberg_L.P.

Bloomberg has strong connections throughout tech and software industries; they have the resources to find out this information. The article isn’t a report on a rumour, nowhere does it even suggest this. It’s a report from Bloomberg saying what they know of this upcoming Nintendo hardware.

To reiterate. They’ve said this report is based on people familiar with the situation and developers. Given the unlikelihood of Nintendo lying about their plans to devs and people familiar with the situation, or that devs and people familiar with the matter would conspire to lie to Bloomberg, the possibilities are that Bloomberg lied about their sources/information said, or that Bloomberg is telling the truth and this report is accurate.

Bottom line, you either suggest the possibility that Bloomberg is lying and doubt the report, or that they aren’t lying and you accept the report. Either Bloomberg lied or they didn’t.



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.

Around the Network
mjk45 on 14 April 2021
Jumpin said:
mjk45 said:

We seen this before where leaked sources have been wrong and also the opposite it's why they are called rumours, now if someone doesn't believe a certain leak with no verifiable source doesn't mean they are accusing the publisher of lying,and this is because it was stated as a rumour and not fact, so what you would be doing is making a judgment based on how you perceive the strength of the rumour nothing more , to accuse them of lying you would need to go further than just not believing that rumour. 

This isn’t EvilMetalDave’s YouTube channel or 1UpNintendoFansite.Com looking for cheap site hits. This is Bloomberg, people pay money to access their content. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bloomberg_L.P.

Bloomberg has strong connections throughout tech and software industries; they have the resources to find out this information. The article isn’t a report on a rumour, nowhere does it even suggest this. It’s a report from Bloomberg saying what they know of this upcoming Nintendo hardware.

To reiterate. They’ve said this report is based on people familiar with the situation and developers. Given the unlikelihood of Nintendo lying about their plans to devs and people familiar with the situation, or that devs and people familiar with the matter would conspire to lie to Bloomberg, the possibilities are that Bloomberg lied about their sources/information said, or that Bloomberg is telling the truth and this report is accurate.

Bottom line, you either suggest the possibility that Bloomberg is lying and doubt the report, or that they aren’t lying and you accept the report. Either Bloomberg lied or they didn’t.

No bloomberg is just the messenger and I'm not going to shoot the messenger, or the source, all I'm doing is waiting for Nvidia or Nintendo before  making a judgement, info without official notification can be right wrong or partially right, take the MS acquisition it was initially widely reported that it was Sony,but it turned out to be MS, just because the buyer turned out to be wrong it still was good intel, it's just a case of until it's confirmed people are allowed to hold there judgement it not like I'm saying their report is wrong and if it is, the most likely scenario is they and their sources info was misread faulty or superseded or  something similar, this being a case of people wilfully lying isn't plausible but that it may be incorrect is. 

Now you can consider it to be correct and you may well be right, my gut feeling is the odds are in your favour, my only gripe is being pushed into a corner using the worn out argument that to disagree is tantamount to an accusation of lying. Now I wrote this reply not to try to change your mind but to allow you to see it from my perspective cheers.



Research shows Video games  help make you smarter, so why am I an idiot