No, Nintendo paid 20.000 billion to Get that exclusive.
No, Nintendo paid 20.000 billion to Get that exclusive.
src said:
The vice versa list would not be nearly as prominent. Nintendo lost, MH,DQ, the best selling Japanese third party games of all time. |
Keep in mind Playstation lost both of them before when the Playstation brand showed visible signs of shrinking in Japan. Sony got both only due to the Wii U being so damn bad at sales and the 3DS so damn weak. Now that Nintendo doesn't have either weakness anymore, both are coming back to Nintendo. You could see it well with the DQ XI S definitive edition first and now MHR releasing in a couple months.
Video games have long production times, so many games that are getting released now have still begun production only around the time the Switch got released, so the Switch being a big success was far from guaranteed at the time. Games that started development in 2019 or later on the other hand, are starting to flock over to the Switch, as the Playstation brand clearly has nothing to counter the Switch in Japan.
The Nintendo eShop rating Thread: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=237454 List as Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aW2hXQT1TheElVS7z-F3pP-7nbqdrDqWNTxl6JoJWBY/edit?usp=sharing
The Steam/GOG key gifting thread: https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread/242024/the-steamgog-key-gifting-thread/1/
Free Pc Games thread: https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread/248138/free-pc-games/1/
You almost have to admire trying to argue in favour of Sony in Japanese sales threads of all places when they're getting absolutely curbstomped by Nintendo on their home turf these days. Almost being the key word.
Last edited by curl-6 - on 25 November 2020RolStoppable said:
Do you have any credible source that hints at or confirms that Nintendo is paying for exclusivity of specific games? |
We do know from the recent Capcom leaks that Nintendo did pay for 6 months of time exclusivity for Monster Hunter. But judging by the leaks Capom only has plans to port the game to PC and not Playstation and Xbox.
Though its pretty obvious that all 3 companies do pay major publishers for some kind of timed exclusive content and Nintendo and Sony are the ones most aggressive with it.
curl-6 said: You almost have to admire the stubbornness of trying to argue in favour of Sony in Japanese sales threads when they're getting absolutely curbstomped by Nintendo on their home turf these days. Almost being the key word. |
And its only really src that does it, they do make these threads a lot more entertaining no matter how wrong they are.
animegaming said:
We do know from the recent Capcom leaks that Nintendo did pay for 6 months of time exclusivity for Monster Hunter. But judging by the leaks Capom only has plans to port the game to PC and not Playstation and Xbox. Though its pretty obvious that all 3 companies do pay major publishers for some kind of timed exclusive content and Nintendo and Sony are the ones most aggressive with it.
And its only really src that does it, they do make these threads a lot more entertaining no matter how wrong they are. |
We gon need a source on Nintendo paying capcom because the leak I saw clearly said it was SONY who paid capcom to keep MH world off Nintendo platforms. Sony paid for PS4 launch exclusivity in the west and permanent exclusivity in Asia.
animegaming said:
We do know from the recent Capcom leaks that Nintendo did pay for 6 months of time exclusivity for Monster Hunter. But judging by the leaks Capom only has plans to port the game to PC and not Playstation and Xbox. Though its pretty obvious that all 3 companies do pay major publishers for some kind of timed exclusive content and Nintendo and Sony are the ones most aggressive with it.
And its only really src that does it, they do make these threads a lot more entertaining no matter how wrong they are. |
Wait how is it obvious that Nintendo is the 2nd most aggressive with it? We only have the one example here compared to Sony where we have many examples. You can't just take one example and run with it. Can you give more examples with references please?
Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also
Even Sony’s paying for timed exclusives pales in comparison to Microsoft’s outright buying of companies for content. How much has Microsoft forked over in the past 20 years?
I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.
Eagle367 said:
Wait how is it obvious that Nintendo is the 2nd most aggressive with it? We only have the one example here compared to Sony where we have many examples. You can't just take one example and run with it. Can you give more examples with references please? |
The biggest example I can think of is Dragon Quest 11S, it was announced the other platforms would be getting the additional content (albeit having to buy the game again) around the time the Switch port turned a year old, then there is Octopath Traveler and Daemon x Machina which got ports to PC around 6 to 12 later which is usually the window that time exclusives last and those were games that Nintendo was heavily marketing prior to launch.
It is amusing to see posts that have no actual point try and respond to my posts.
RolStoppable said:
Do you have any credible source that hints at or confirms that Nintendo is paying for exclusivity of specific games? |
Yes, Capcom themselves via the recent leak. Or is reality to much for some to handle here?
Wyrdness said:
How did Nintendo lose MH when it originated on PS platforms and was on PS2, PS3 and PSP as well as PC? DQ was also on PS platforms from the PS1 era through to the PS2? Not only do you have no actual point here you don't really have a clue on what you're on about either. TWEWY was on mobile and I guarantee you the NS version of the second game will outsell the PS4 game. |
This isn't rocket science.
Nintendo lost MH after having it exclusive for an entire generation, a total of 5 exclusive games reduced to 1. Having DQ9 was amassive third party exclusive, alongside its numerous spin offs, of which Nintendo have lost nearly all.
Its not about the point of origin, its about the change in hands. Bringing up TWEWY mobile is desperation at its finest, when the contention was console sales. It would be worrying for Nintendo if a prior Nintendo exclusive somehow didn't sell more on its future console than on PS.
Bofferbrauer2 said:
Keep in mind Playstation lost both of them before when the Playstation brand showed visible signs of shrinking in Japan. Sony got both only due to the Wii U being so damn bad at sales and the 3DS so damn weak. Now that Nintendo doesn't have either weakness anymore, both are coming back to Nintendo. You could see it well with the DQ XI S definitive edition first and now MHR releasing in a couple months. Video games have long production times, so many games that are getting released now have still begun production only around the time the Switch got released, so the Switch being a big success was far from guaranteed at the time. Games that started development in 2019 or later on the other hand, are starting to flock over to the Switch, as the Playstation brand clearly has nothing to counter the Switch in Japan. |
Not really. They're coming back but are not exclusive like they once were. Instead they now have notably popular Playstation SKUs. MH Rise is made by the Generations team, which was just one of many MHs 3DS that the SW will not.
The mainline MH, MH World will be effectively Playstation exclusive in Japan.
You're also wrong. PS4/5 has better Japanese support than the SW, even looking at titles one gets and the other does not.
PS4/5 titles missing the SW: