Eagle367 said:
animegaming said:
We do know from the recent Capcom leaks that Nintendo did pay for 6 months of time exclusivity for Monster Hunter. But judging by the leaks Capom only has plans to port the game to PC and not Playstation and Xbox. Though its pretty obvious that all 3 companies do pay major publishers for some kind of timed exclusive content and Nintendo and Sony are the ones most aggressive with it. curl-6 said:
You almost have to admire the stubbornness of trying to argue in favour of Sony in Japanese sales threads when they're getting absolutely curbstomped by Nintendo on their home turf these days. Almost being the key word. |
And its only really src that does it, they do make these threads a lot more entertaining no matter how wrong they are. |
Wait how is it obvious that Nintendo is the 2nd most aggressive with it? We only have the one example here compared to Sony where we have many examples. You can't just take one example and run with it. Can you give more examples with references please? |
The biggest example I can think of is Dragon Quest 11S, it was announced the other platforms would be getting the additional content (albeit having to buy the game again) around the time the Switch port turned a year old, then there is Octopath Traveler and Daemon x Machina which got ports to PC around 6 to 12 later which is usually the window that time exclusives last and those were games that Nintendo was heavily marketing prior to launch.
