By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Assassin’s Creed Valhalla runs upscaled 4K / 60 FPS on PS5. Xbox Series X native 4K 60.

Barkley said:
kirby007 said:

it was back then for exactly the same reason.....


EDIT: BUT IT DOESN'T COUNT IF ITS AGAINST THE CONSOLE OF MY FAVOUR HURRRDUURRR

I've already explained the difference.

900p vs 1080p is noticeable. I very much doubt at the much higher resolution with diminishing returns and the less than half power gap the difference is going to be noticeable in standard gameplay to almost anyone.

900p vs 1080p is a noticeable increase in image quality.

1900p vs 2160p? is anyone going to notice?

That's my point. The gap this time is so small that the only people that are going to care are the ones looking for ammo.

ok so this purely based on a I FEEL on your side fine.

im out

have fun



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

Around the Network
kirby007 said:
Barkley said:

I've already explained the difference.

900p vs 1080p is noticeable. I very much doubt at the much higher resolution with diminishing returns and the less than half power gap the difference is going to be noticeable in standard gameplay to almost anyone.

900p vs 1080p is a noticeable increase in image quality.

1900p vs 2160p? is anyone going to notice?

That's my point. The gap this time is so small that the only people that are going to care are the ones looking for ammo.

ok so this purely based on a I FEEL on your side fine.

im out

have fun

No it's based purely on maths. 40% vs 17%. Thanks.



Barkley said:
kirby007 said:

ok so this purely based on a I FEEL on your side fine.

im out

have fun

No it's based purely on maths. 40% vs 17%. Thanks.

since when is 17%=0%



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

Shiken said:
golfgt170 said:

I stopped reading there. I guess that this Is your opinion?

What makes this the biggest than the other releases? Sales?

I suppose you missed the part where he said "arguably".

arguably: used to say that a statement is very possibly true even if it is not certainly true. So, It's debatable and his opinion.

Arguably there will be a lot of games that will run on ps5 4k 60fps with superior graphics than ASS creed, which is so heavily advertised by MS.



The logic leap seems pretty desperate here. Allow me to show you why.

  • "Last month, Ubisoft stated that Assassin’s Creed Valhalla would run in 4K/60 FPS on the PS5" On 22nd, Sep. 2020
  • "this seemed a given since the Xbox Series X version was confirmed to run at the same settings" On 09th, Sep. 2020
  • I can confirm that Assassin’s Creed Valhalla runs at 4K at 60 fps on PS5 (upscaled 4K) | October 29, 2020
  • "It’s unknown whether this applies to the Xbox Series X version as well"

    So they declare both are 4k/60FPS. Neither says the phrase "native".
    They then confirm the PS5 is not "native" but no where in there do they confirm that the Xbox is native.

    If you check ubi soft's blog post https://news.ubisoft.com/en-us/article/24pOdAVM0hnCzWWFiXxPga/ubisoft-on-the-next-generation-of-consoles-get-the-details
    There is no use of the word native.

    "along with detailed 4K at 60 frames per second visuals and faster loading speeds due to the additional power of the console’s ultra-high speed SSD"
    "Stonehenge in 4K resolution at 60 frames per second on Xbox Series X"
Last edited by Bandorr - on 31 October 2020

  • Deadliest mass shooting by an individual in US history (10/01/2017)
  • Deadliest high school shooting in US history (02/14/2018)
  • Deadliest massacre of Jews in US history (10/27/2018)
  • Political assassination attempt of TWO former presidents(and 10+ other people)  (10/23/2018 - and beyond)
Around the Network

Shouldn’t have any concerns with my 32” 1080p tv 😂



golfgt170 said:
Shiken said:

I suppose you missed the part where he said "arguably".

arguably: used to say that a statement is very possibly true even if it is not certainly true. So, It's debatable and his opinion.

Arguably there will be a lot of games that will run on ps5 4k 60fps with superior graphics than ASS creed, which is so heavily advertised by MS.

I am just going to leave this here...



Nintendo Switch Friend Code: SW-5643-2927-1984

Animal Crossing NH Dream Address: DA-1078-9916-3261

See! All you doubters! This game was not held back by last generation! Despite being designed for the PS5, it still can run 4k/60 fps on the current gen Series X! What all you haters have to say now?!

;)



Barkley said:
kirby007 said:

it was back then for exactly the same reason.....


EDIT: BUT IT DOESN'T COUNT IF ITS AGAINST THE CONSOLE OF MY FAVOUR HURRRDUURRR

I've already explained the difference.

900p vs 1080p is noticeable. I very much doubt at the much higher resolution with diminishing returns and the less than half power gap the difference is going to be noticeable in standard gameplay to almost anyone.

900p vs 1080p is a noticeable increase in image quality.

1900p vs 2160p? is anyone going to notice?

That's my point. The gap this time is so small that the only people that are going to care are the ones looking for ammo.

Now the gap may be larger than this, we'll find out in a couple of weeks but I doubt it. There comes a point when a gap is small enough that the only reason to care is console wars.

Exactly. Upscaling techniques have gotten far more refined as well, nothing like the crude upscaling we had at the start of this gen.

Apart from that, my tv has only increased in size by a factor 1.25x (52" 1080p to 65" 4K)
1080p was more than enough for the 52" tv (still looks great on the 4K one)
1.25x 1080p, 1350p is plenty for this gen for me.

Actually from my regular sitting position I can't notice anything above 1440p, the rest is all a waste of resources.

Hitting native display resolution isn't that important any more since 4K dot pitch is so 4x smaller than 1080p and people have not gotten 4x bigger tvs. Temporal upscaling and anti aliasing techniques also make native display resolution far less important. DF is having to jump through hoops nowadays trying to count the pixels.

And yep, the power gap (percentage wise) next gen is even smaller than this gen.



Dulfite said:
See! All you doubters! This game was not held back by last generation! Despite being designed for the PS5, it still can run 4k/60 fps on the current gen Series X! What all you haters have to say now?!

;)

What source says this game was designed for the PS5?



  • Deadliest mass shooting by an individual in US history (10/01/2017)
  • Deadliest high school shooting in US history (02/14/2018)
  • Deadliest massacre of Jews in US history (10/27/2018)
  • Political assassination attempt of TWO former presidents(and 10+ other people)  (10/23/2018 - and beyond)