By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - MS CEO Nadella: We Will Consider Buying Even More Game Companies In Future

the-pi-guy said:
ironmanDX said:

You said insinuated it isn't the same as buying Bethesda because Bethesda is established. If you didn't call the studios listed above unknown, are you agreeing with me now?

Is it the same? Is it different (again) somehow? Sony=Good MS=Bad?

Has nothing to do with Sony=good, MS=bad.

Frankly buying one of the biggest publishers who routinely publishes games on both platforms with massive amounts of success is very different from buying small developers. 

IG made most of its best games with Sony's backing and they were largely exclusive before being bought. ND, SP were largely exclusive before being bought. Xbox owners don't lose anything from them being bought.  PS owners gain from Sony making larger investments into their projects. 

 Bethesda on the other hand, routinely made games for both platforms. PS owners lose out on their games because they're an established multiplatform publisher. 

Microsoft buying Playground Games is a fantastic thing that benefits Xbox players and doesn't hurt PS players.  

Microsoft buying Bethesda isn't the same thing. 

I know. Which is why I provided a list with multiple purchases by Sony. A lot of them not small. A lot of them multiplatform developers, including Insomniac.

I'm just trying to figure out, in the end, after all purchases up until this point... Is it really that different? 

There are a few of games that were made for Xbox from Bethesda which didn't appear on Playstation consoles either, not to mention Windows... Morrowind being the most obvious one. I was trying to steer it away from "mostly exclusive" talk rabbit hole. A multiplatform developer is a multiplatform developer.



Around the Network
zero129 said:
HollyGamer said:

Remember, Sony and Nintendo  dont have PC platform OS like Apple or Microsoft. They depend on consoles or handled (Nintendo). That's why their lock in to their ecosystem. If you think Sony and Nintendo is bullshit by looking into their exclusives then why don't you use smartphones as an example where some Apple app only available on iOS. 

It's about platform or ecosystem, Microsoft will win if Sony put their games on PC but not with Sony. Their revenue will be much bigger on their own platform/Service (PSPlus/Now/PS consoles). 

Remember Sony and Nintendo could easy build their own Store on PC where they wouldnt be giving MS a cut of anything. Thats whats great about an Open platform like the PC.

That is "open" from a hardware standpoint as long as you abide by a Microsoft ecosystem.  That in itself is NOT open.  See the irony in a popular misconception?



I hope they ease up a bit on the acquisitions. How do we know they'll not mess up fan favorite IPs just so they work better with the gamepass model? Microsoft already went full Destiny with the Halo franchise and I'm not sure I like what they showed.



SanAndreasX said:
Soundwave said:
Sony only buys certain studios fine, but they are annoyingly active in trying to block other platforms from content. FF7R exclusivity for a year, FF16 exclusivity for a year, blocking Spider-Man in other versions of Avengers (how fucking petty is this)?, now there's talk of a MGS1 Remake that they've money hatted.

So sorry I don't feel bad if someone finally walloped Sony upside the head. Sony's been block content from other platforms for decades, it's hard to feel sympathy for them when they pushed someone too big and now got pushed back onto their ass.

A large part of that is the simple fact that Final Fantasy sells poorly on Xbox, as does pretty much every other Japanese franchise. Setting aside Xbox's bad performance in Japan, even in the US the series sells far better on PlayStation. So that's just as much on the Xbox userbase as it is on Sony.

From neogaf: Sony bought their way into the videogame industry in the first place, that very concept of the Playstation 1 console is a money hat!! ?????? After the Nintendo relationship collapsed Sony Corp. Wrote Krazy Ken a big fat cheque
Financially they dwarfed Nintendo and Sega and crippled the Saturn in particular with that infamous mic drop price at E3 (any of you think that was cheap?). During PS1 era Sony bought Psygnosis (which at the time was a multiplat studio) and moneyhatted Tomb Raider so the sequels got delayed or didn't go to Saturn and N64. The first game was a big success on Saturn, PS and PC.
Psygnosis made game multiplat for a year into PS1 and then Sony seemed to cut them off from other platforms. And we dont even need to talk about how they hobbled the Dreamcast with PS2 hype.



zero129 said:
HollyGamer said:

Remember, Sony and Nintendo  dont have PC platform OS like Apple or Microsoft. They depend on consoles or handled (Nintendo). That's why their lock in to their ecosystem. If you think Sony and Nintendo is bullshit by looking into their exclusives then why don't you use smartphones as an example where some Apple app only available on iOS. 

It's about platform or ecosystem, Microsoft will win if Sony put their games on PC but not with Sony. Their revenue will be much bigger on their own platform/Service (PSPlus/Now/PS consoles). 

Remember Sony and Nintendo could easy build their own Store on PC where they wouldnt be giving MS a cut of anything. Thats whats great about an Open platform like the PC.

Except the fact you will possibly need Windows to run the App which supports the OS, which is the primary mover for MS. 



Around the Network
Cerebralbore101 said:
ironmanDX said:

You said insinuated it isn't the same as buying Bethesda because Bethesda is established. If you didn't call the studios listed above unknown, are you agreeing with me now?

Is it the same? Is it different (again) somehow? Sony=Good MS=Bad?

lol, no. I said that Sony buying Insomniac isn't the same as MS buying Bethesda. The reason should have been obvious, when looking at the post you originally quoted. "Yeah, MS buying Bethesda is like Sony buying a dev team which almost exclusively develops for Sony for ages."

Unknown studios was obviously referring to other Sony acquisitions in your wikipedia list. Or do you seriously think, that I was claiming that the makers of Spyro, and Ratchet were unknown in 2020, when Sony bought them?

Your reading comprehension is terrible.

No, I don't think that.  Now that we've established they have bought several developers that were not unknown, did have big games, I'm asking is it really that different? The real core of the question. 

MS also have "other" developers they've also built from the ground up (343, initiative, turn 10) or have bought when small and relatively unknown (compulsion, inxile)?

Sure sounds like what Sony has done over the years to me.



pokoko said:

Are people serious about a narrative where Microsoft is some kind of victim?  That they stood noble and pure against the nasty tactics of their competitors until they had enough and suddenly decided to "push back"?

Anyone remember Dead or Alive 3?  The original Xbox exclusive that Microsoft bought to be a launch game?

Because I do.  Yeah, Microsoft has been throwing the moneyhat from the very beginning of Xbox history.  They're just as guilty of it as anyone else.  There is no moral high ground for ANY of the video game manufacturers.

It's a silly argument because these are all corporations that would fuck ALL of us over in a second if they thought it was to their advantage. 

Stop being puppets and stooges.  You're making the people who play video games look like complete jokes and the businessmen who only care about your money are laughing at you while you look like nimrods for defending them.

Also noone remembers when they did Apple when the pulled the rug from them, by acquiring Bungie and taking Halo. After they announced the first game.

Idd though cheerleading corporate takeovers is kind lul worthy. And is not healthy for competitors in the long run.



CptYellowPants said:
I hope they ease up a bit on the acquisitions. How do we know they'll not mess up fan favorite IPs just so they work better with the gamepass model? Microsoft already went full Destiny with the Halo franchise and I'm not sure I like what they showed.

Obsidian is clearly doing things right. Mojang is still killing it as well. Lots are hyped for Ninja Theories Hellblade game (not my cup of tea). RARE was a disappointment early on with them, but are starting to make better games and updates now. Inexhiles Wasteland 3 is a phenomenal game (kind of blowing my mind lol). I haven't heard anything bad about the quality of Playground Games Forza games.

Overall I think the studios seem to be doing well so far being under MS. We won't fully know for a few years when games made in early stages at MS come to fruition, though. I think all the studios they purchased are in better shape than 343i.



the-pi-guy said:
KratosLives said:

People don't understand that fallout and elderscrolls , starfield is still going to come to ps5. They need to make their money back and there is alot to be made with license fees to sony. Making it console exclusive and hoping to bring in millions more won't do it. Think about it, there will be a big install base ezpecially for starfield/elder scrolls on pc. Those that bought xbox. Those who chose ps5 as console of choice aren't going to or intend to ditch the ps5 and their exclusives because of one or exclusives they would like. Those who would even consider switching, i'm sure they are well aware of the playstation having more exclusives that they want, which is why they would go for ps5 in the first place. How many are on the fence thinking about which console of choice to go for?? You might see some people buying a ps5 and series s, but that would be small percentage. There will also be huge backlash against them if they opt not to, and it will cause damage to them , more so through social media.

I think you're underestimating the value Bethesda has. Skyrim sold 10's of millions of copies.  

If it convinces 10 million people to sign up for Gamepass, they could be looking at $100 million a month. That's 1.2 billion every year.  That's before they've sold any games.  It'll take a few years to make back the investment, but considering BGS's size, they will almost certainly make it back.

You also seem to be underestimating how many people would switch over/ buy a second console.  Huge numbers of people don't care about platforms. They only care about playing CoD, GTA with their friends. 

I don't know. I see 3 ways this could all go down.  

1.) Treat Bethesda as if it was still mostly third party. In this case, MS benefits from game sales on other platforms and they benefit from Zenimax being on Gamepass which is still a huge benefit. This option also pisses off the fewest number of people.  But it is almost certainly the least profitable.  

2.) Use Zenimax as an in to get Gamepass on other platforms.  Basically "We will give you TES VI if you also take Gamepass.". This is pretty consistent with what Phil has been talking about. And it'd be huge for MS to get Gamepass on PS.  

3.) Go fully exclusive.  Use TES VI to make people buy a PC, Xbox, Gamepass.  Force them to have to buy their platform to experience their favorite WRPG or shooters.  

I've probably spend over 300 hours playing Skyrim. Wouldn't it be cheaper to just buy games like that instead of paying a monthly fee?  



the-pi-guy said:
ironmanDX said:

I know. Which is why I provided a list with multiple purchases by Sony. A lot of them not small. A lot of them multiplatform developers, including Insomniac.

I'm just trying to figure out, in the end, after all purchases up until this point... Is it really that different? 

There are a few of games that were made for Xbox from Bethesda which didn't appear on Playstation consoles either, not to mention Windows... Morrowind being the most obvious one. I was trying to steer it away from "mostly exclusive" talk rabbit hole. A multiplatform developer is a multiplatform developer.

I was talking about Insomniac. The only good game they made on Xbox was Sunset Overdrive. Considering the gap between that release and when Sony bought them, there was apparently little interest in making a sequel. MS fans hardly lost anything. Aside from a miniscule chance of a sequel.  

Meanwhile, PS fans who played Skyrim, Oblivion, Fallout, Doom, Evil Within, Rage, etc.  are probably not going to be playing any of the future titles.  

TBH, I'm not so sure about that. I'm one of the few Xbox fans that think they'll keep the bigger titles multiplatform.

Ori shadow released on the Switch not a week ago, the second of the series on the Switch. Cuphead is also multiplatform.

Minecraft is still available. Minecraft dungeons has released.

Based on the info we have, it doesn't seem to be the case that, at least the larger titles, will be omitted.

This is a tangent to the point I'm actually trying to make and neither of us have crystal balls though.