By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Sony Representative Contacted Vice After Critical Review of The Last of Us 2

DonFerrari on 03 July 2020
padib said:
DonFerrari said:

Burden of proof, and beyond resonable doubt are two requisites before trying to put a serious accusation.

It's not a problem of burden of proof man, it's a question of logic, and you're proving to be not making an effort.

Let me prove it to you (or do the math for you...):

- DCG mentions that he didn't receive a review copy for Ghost of Tsushima.
- DCG reports from his peers that Sony has been very generous with the review copy.
- We know that DCG must reach out to Sony in order to get a review copy, the options are: 1) he gets no response, 2) he gets a response but no game, 3) he gets the game.
- We know that DCG reviews tons of game (just go on his channel, do a bit of homework!), 254 review videos are online, including Sony-published Insomniac Games' Spider Man, Sony-published Quantic Dream's Detroit Become Human, Japan Studio's Shadow of the Colossus Remake, Naughty Dog's Uncharted Lost Legacy, Sony-published David Jaffe's Drawn to Death, Guerrilla Games' Horizon: Zero Dawn, Sony-published Tecmo Koei's Nioh, Japan Studio's The Last Guardian, Naughty Dog's Uncharted 4, Sony-published Insomniac Games' Ratchet & Clank 2016, Sony-published FromSoftware's Bloodborne, Sony-published Ready at Dawn's The order 1886. All bolded entities ARE Sony. I did not bold Insomniac since they were purchased in 2019.
- This means that DCG got a response and the game for all these games reviewed, so with Sony he received 12 review copies with no issue, including 2 for Naughty Dog games.
- DCG reports that he usually always gets the games, and if not, at least a cordial response (perhaps asking him to wait, since well he got all the games he reviewed).

The burden of proof is rather on you to prove that he was not able to review a game due to not receiving a copy. Even harder, the burden of proof is on you to prove that he's lying about being surprised that he did not get a response. You would also have to answer:

- What games would he have tried to review but was blocked? Almost all the recent Sony games seem to be on his list.
- Why would he lie about not receiving a response from Sony, what kind of motive could he have?
- That DCG has a habit of being dishonest. (Good luck)

OR

You could just admit the obvious, that Sony is behaving badly. But no, you need me to spend hours answering such an obvious fact because, the truth is this: you can't ever accept that Sony did something wrong, when it's obvious not only in this case, but in many other cases reported these days.

So NO, the burden of proof is not on me, but on you, and it's now YOUR turn to do the homework

I guess you really didn't heard of the terms burden of proof, reasonable doubt and others to an allegation of malicious practice or crimes.

You just put conjectures about a possible bad behavior, sorry to inform you but that wouldn't stick on any respectable court.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
LudicrousSpeed on 03 July 2020

yea bro fuck logic or something blatantly obvious. if u can’t get a conviction in a court of law then don’t even open your mouth!



DonFerrari on 03 July 2020
LudicrousSpeed said:
yea bro fuck logic or something blatantly obvious. if u can’t get a conviction in a court of law then don’t even open your mouth!

You can use your logic to claim it is possible of incorrect conduct, but to throw an accusation "logic" isn't just enough. But of course if it was someone posting against MS you would find your way to claim the person is only doing the claim because of console war and is utter wrong right?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

LudicrousSpeed on 03 July 2020

Per usual you make it about console warz. At ease, soldier.



DonFerrari on 03 July 2020
LudicrousSpeed said:
Per usual you make it about console warz. At ease, soldier.

Per usual you always claim to not be in the console war and being neutral, never change.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
kirby007 on 03 July 2020

@cgi-quality just lock it



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.