I can certainly understand being displeased by what an author says, but that doesn't really change the story. Be it people that became pissed when she revealed that Dumbledore was gay (certainly there is plenty of hints in the book), or people that get sad that she isn't an advocate for trans people that doesn't change the book.

Actually the interpretation of the book will change each time you read because you have changed as well. But there is a reason to not take opinion of others and even more of celebrities in account, because the only opinion that matters is yourself and at most the ones close that love you.

I understand it, and agree with you. And would you deny that people that act to this extreme doesn't need professional help to deal with their issues and improve in life?

She just has a different opinion on what sex is and what makes a woman. She's never advocated for stripping trans rights or anything of that sort. Im not saying i agree eith her or anything cause honestly I dont cate that much but its its something I always see on Twitter. People have a different opinion thats not necessarily hateful and everyone tries to cancel them because its not what tbe mainstream sees as the proper opinion. 

She pretty explicitly advocated for the segregation of "biological" women and trans women when speaking about spaces traditionally segregated by sex (ie bathrooms and changing rooms), as well as supporting legal distinctions between sex and gender. While you could make an argument about whether you think these rights should be granted, you cannot make an argument that this isn't a question of trans rights. It is.

She pretty explicitly advocated for the segregation of "biological" women and trans women when speaking about spaces traditionally segregated by sex (ie bathrooms and changing rooms), as well as supporting legal distinctions between sex and gender. While you could make an argument about whether you think these rights should be granted, you cannot make an argument that this isn't a question of trans rights. It is.

There's no such thing as 'trans' tho.

You either make eggs or egg crackers.

This linguistic argument is altogether fruitless both in its nature as strictly semantic and in its nature as idiotic.

"Trans" certainly exists in a linguistic sense. The terms "cis" and "trans" are utilized in several areas, one of which being Chemistry. These two terms are utilized to speak of different forms of the same molecule and how they are conformed in space. This is similar to how they are utilized to speak about trans identity. It speaks to different forms of the same concept.

That said, the utter irrelevance of your ravings strikes me. I explicitly stated that I was not making an argument which was predicated on any personal opinions regarding the validity of trans identity, so I will leave you here to tilt at windmills.

Have a night.