Is that The Russian youtuber the first person to report that Horizon is coming to the PC?

Or are you just talking about Jason Schleier?

Okay, serious question here: do you guys really keep paying for a subscription service even if you are not satisfied with the content you are receiving?

The current generation of MS started very unfortunately (weaker console and at the same time more expensive, and all the confusion with only digital distribution), and for the next few years it was not much better (Fable was not created, and Halo 5 did not live up to expectations). Only for about 3 years MS began to embrace the topic again, which slightly improved the sales of consoles and financial results. In fact, all these preparations will culminate at the start of the new console and from the beginning was just such an idea.

Currently PS Now has probably 1 million users and Gamepass has 10 million. So for now MS is doing a much better job in this regard.

Sony will continue to have an advantage, and exclusive games will be more impressive than those on Xbox, which is why sales of PS5 will be better. But I'm of the opinion that MS will take a bigger step forward in this generation.

PS NOW and game pass have different service prices, so it's hard to decide which is better just by the number of users.
It's the game pass that's consumer-friendly, but MS hasn't disclosed how much it's making.
That said, no one cares about the loss of MS, so if you just look at the service, everyone will applaud the game pass. That's great.

Im pretty sure most gamers would not pay for something thats ovbiously a disapointment. But fallout 76 still has many players and pay that fallout 1rst, so Im not sure what to think anymore.

But what makes you think thouse 10m subs are paying for GP? The have giving this service for free since inception and offer $1 deals for  who know how many times. Have you noticed how they convoluted their finncial report so now you cant determine anything? Yea, something tells me they are not profiting from gamepass yet.

Okay, let me see if I understand this; so MS gave those subscriptions for free..  And now their plan to convince those people to keep paying is to keep putting out non-quality games...

 Do you really not see a flow in that logic?

If the price is small you would be surprised on how many people keep paying. They enjoy it for a couple months them forget to cancel and keep paying. Not saying it the case of GP that seems a good service, but it happens.

Once those special deals are up, you can't use them anymore. That's what happened with me, but I'm happily paying for the service because the value alone is easily worth it. 

You can pretend I said what ever you want but I like they way your going. It dosent make sense does it?

Now with what I said, of thouse 10m "users", How many are currently subed, or reocurring subs or temp subs that only do it while theres a  special offer or the month a big release come out? Nobody knows right. As far as we know that could be 10m individuals who used gamepass at some point. The current subs could be lower. How is split between paid, free or discount is unknown and MS is never gona tell us.

And yea, gamepass is a good offer. If you have an xbox you should definnetly jump on that. Even lower quality games that they offer is still  bargain. And the few AAA they add is also really good and if they do increase the amount of games added would be even better. Just saying that with that model off buisness they need a really high number of subs to offset the cost. and that cost gets bigger the more AAA games they add. So they can make the service great now at a loss to gain subs or wait untill theres more subs to make it better. dont know. Dont know the cost or profit. they are not telling. Just saying where it a succes they would be more clear and stop trying to hide numbers. but the value of gamepass is top notch.

good luck getting a real answer, I've asked numerous times because it's a very common argument people here make against GamePass. Hell earlier in the thread the same person you're replying to said:

"But also indicates that they are uneilling to offer quality games. If they do it will be like one a year and a bunch of Indy games or it just would not be worth it."

So they're gonna sell a service that gives one quality game a year and a bunch of indies? Isn't this already called Games with Gold or PS+? lol