eva01beserk said:
3 seconds? My mistake, I take it all back. Dont pretend you dint know that was a hyperbole. And so they should extended. Why not? If you see the critisim online people whent in asuming 2-3 hours when they heard its all about gameplay. There are no other presentations from anyone else, so having all day for that would have been fine by all. Where this E3 where 5 others have a 2 hours each would be understandable, but not here.
I also follow CGI, not as much as you probably and sure thouse screenshots look amazing. But I also follow others on youtube whos main channels are about hardware comparasion and they show they actual gameplay with various components and while playing avove 60fps and the diference is hardly notiable. They actually have to freeze the frames and actually zoom in to notice thouse diference. Higher framerates stope being noticeable after a point. granted that varies from person to person but everyone has a limit on how many fps they can appreciate.
Again games in development tent to shoot higher than what eventually deliver and you can see that on almost every E3 as they need to downgrade and the final game is night and day, so now they should be better. Remember Anthem? Watchdogs? do I need to go on?
Im glad you like AI, as that is definetly held back by the cpu and I her some say that the hdd as well and the various animations and character details and possible actions are read directly from storage, so better storage and cpu means vastly better AI. Wich is something that does not change across gens, so if they make something the x1/ps4 can handle, the same AI will be implemented on ps5/xsx. There could be like small aditions and enhancements but like you said, they wont screw over the majority of players and offer a vastly diferent experience for last gen.
|
Don't know what show u been watching. U need to look at it again.
Bright memory infinite was pure gameplay as the game was made by one person. The entire trailer was in game gameplay
Call of of sea showed how the game will look on xbox series x. That was in game graphics that they showed.
Chorus : Half of the trailer showed actual In game gameplay. U can tell from the graphics showed.
Scarlett nexus had more than half is trailer showing in game gameplay when it was fighting monsters and bosses.
Second extinction :the ugliest looking game showcased and that was pure gameplay in that trailer.
The ascent :that was majority gameplay in that trailer. U can see it there.
Medium: the last 20 seconds of the trailer showcased the gameplay.
Vampire masquerade 2 had about 30 % of its trailer with gameplay. U can see the difference between cg and gameplay. It was obvious.
Dirt 5 is all gameplay as that's how it will look like in game
These out of 13 showed way more than 3 seconds. I envy cgi computer!. Wished I had that kind of pc power as his screenshot look stunning!. I don't have a pc that can beyond 60fps on modern games but I can imagine it will be as big as it is between 30fps and 60fps. We all would love 2 to 3 hours but the developers need to get the game done on time with the pandemic going on.
Not everyone is ubisoft and bioware. Ubisoft have learnt since watchdogs as all their modern AC games quality and remained when it get finally released.
I am waiting for the day when I get outsmarted by AI and not by AI that has either too much health, extra strength, long reach or just priority for attacks. I want them to be actually intelligent lol. Fingers cross the next gen we get that.
Last edited by dane007 - on 08 May 2020