Forums - Gaming Discussion - Bayonetta 1 or 2?

I choose...

Bayonetta 1 10 28.57%
 
Bayonetta 2 25 71.43%
 
Total:35

1 wins just from the space harrier throwback.



Whoever said life to be like a box of chocolates clearly didn't know what he was talking about. 

Life is more like a game of bumper cars. At every turn there is a possibility you will get screwed.

Around the Network

2 has an hommage section with Star Fox gameplay.

Checkmate



Switch Friend Code : 3905-6122-2909 

Not sure if it's a checkmate since Space Harrier came first in the early arcade and Sega Master System says and kind of was one of the founders of that type of on rails shooter. 

Either way, Space Harrier and Lylat Wars bring back fond memories of growing up. 



Whoever said life to be like a box of chocolates clearly didn't know what he was talking about. 

Life is more like a game of bumper cars. At every turn there is a possibility you will get screwed.

CGI-Quality said:
Chrkeller said:

I'll remember that.  When there is a thread about a ps4 exclusive, I'll comment about how weak the hardware is and how it hurts the game.  Friendly bet says I get attacked and the mods blame me.  This place is beyond biased.  But hey, like most I am spending less and less time here.  So by all means, keep up the "good" work.  

Yeah, well, we can discuss your issues with VGC elsewhere. In the mean time, respect the simple rule of attack the post and not the poster. 

Oh, and for the record, someone wanting a game on PC because they'd prefer it having the best possible output versus console(s) is a legit desire. I'm not frayed by your opinion on that (which was also legit), merely the way you handled it. 

^^^


This is legit what I was trying to say.


I played the first one on PS3, had a horrible experience. Played it on 360, had a solid experience. Played it on PC years later, had the best possible experience for myself.

All I wanted was to be able to play Bayo 2, to the best of it's ability, on more capable hw. We've seen this happen with emu's before, but that's not me being a fanboy or anything, that's a legit fact, based on what we see via the emulators, on higher end hw. Again, to anyone getting fussy over me pointing that out, don't, it's just pointless and stems from personal warring (which there is no need of).

Also, I did mention of myself owning a Switch. I have games for it and play it on a daily basis, just as much as I do my PC, but I saw how Bayo 2 looked and performed, as well as it's initial asking price and that completely put me off wanting to buy it entirely. I know it would be easily playable on my rig, and that's the place where I'd want to play it (I could technically just resort to emu'ing it, but I don't really feel that sort of urge, to go out of my way).

There's absolutely nothing trollish about making my own personal opinion, on a thread that was asking me about Bayo 1-2.

You know what's really biased?. A few in this thread upvoting the fake call-out of a person who thinks I'm a troll, who already have it out for me, and also making passive-aggressive comments on wanting to "add me to the list of butthurt" (I'm not stupid).

Edit: Also, I had no such "ill intent", and I diligaf at the "it wouldn't be made possible without Nintendo" excuse either. That's more a card to use for passive-aggressive jabbing and a defensive measure, to which there is no need for such a thing.  

Last edited by Chazore - on 02 April 2020

                                       

Chazore said:
CGI-Quality said:

Yeah, well, we can discuss your issues with VGC elsewhere. In the mean time, respect the simple rule of attack the post and not the poster. 

Oh, and for the record, someone wanting a game on PC because they'd prefer it having the best possible output versus console(s) is a legit desire. I'm not frayed by your opinion on that (which was also legit), merely the way you handled it. 

^^^


This is legit what I was trying to say.


I played the first one on PS3, had a horrible experience. Played it on 360, had a solid experience. Played it on PC years later, had the best possible experience for myself.

All I wanted was to be able to play Bayo 2, to the best of it's ability, on more capable hw. We've seen this happen with emu's before, but that's not me being a fanboy or anything, that's a legit fact, based on what we see via the emulators, on higher end hw. Again, to anyone getting fussy over me pointing that out, don't, it's just pointless and stems from personal warring (which there is no need of).

Also, I did mention of myself owning a Switch. I have games for it and play it on a daily basis, just as much as I do my PC, but I saw how Bayo 2 looked and performed, as well as it's initial asking price and that completely put me off wanting to buy it entirely. I know it would be easily playable on my rig, and that's the place where I'd want to play it (I could technically just resort to emu'ing it, but I don't really feel that sort of urge, to go out of my way).

There's absolutely nothing trollish about making my own personal opinion, on a thread that was asking me about Bayo 1-2.

You know what's really biased?. A few in this thread upvoting the fake call-out of a person who thinks I'm a troll, who already have it out for me, and also making passive-aggressive comments on wanting to "add me to the list of butthurt" (I'm not stupid).

Edit: Also, I had no such "ill intent", and I diligaf at the "it wouldn't be made possible without Nintendo" excuse either. That's more a card to use for passive-aggressive jabbing and a defensive measure, to which there is no need for such a thing.  

I find this position a curious one.

You say you own a Switch and play it on a daily basis.

But if you care so strongly about graphical performance and want only the best in that regard, why buy or play on a Switch in the first place, or any console for that matter? Why not just play everything on PC at maxed settings?

Last edited by curl-6 - on 02 April 2020

Around the Network
Chazore said:

^^^


This is legit what I was trying to say.


I played the first one on PS3, had a horrible experience. Played it on 360, had a solid experience. Played it on PC years later, had the best possible experience for myself.

All I wanted was to be able to play Bayo 2, to the best of it's ability, on more capable hw. We've seen this happen with emu's before, but that's not me being a fanboy or anything, that's a legit fact, based on what we see via the emulators, on higher end hw. Again, to anyone getting fussy over me pointing that out, don't, it's just pointless and stems from personal warring (which there is no need of).

Also, I did mention of myself owning a Switch. I have games for it and play it on a daily basis, just as much as I do my PC, but I saw how Bayo 2 looked and performed, as well as it's initial asking price and that completely put me off wanting to buy it entirely. I know it would be easily playable on my rig, and that's the place where I'd want to play it (I could technically just resort to emu'ing it, but I don't really feel that sort of urge, to go out of my way).

There's absolutely nothing trollish about making my own personal opinion, on a thread that was asking me about Bayo 1-2.

You know what's really biased?. A few in this thread upvoting the fake call-out of a person who thinks I'm a troll, who already have it out for me, and also making passive-aggressive comments on wanting to "add me to the list of butthurt" (I'm not stupid).

Edit: Also, I had no such "ill intent", and I diligaf at the "it wouldn't be made possible without Nintendo" excuse either. That's more a card to use for passive-aggressive jabbing and a defensive measure, to which there is no need for such a thing.  

The problem with your argument here is that the topic was never about the direction your post took things it was comparing the two games to each other I play most games on PC for best output as well but nothing about what was asked and secondly B2 was made for Wii U as a lead platform not NS which is a more powerful platform and a hybrid. Lastly output doesn't factor in as much with exclusives because the title is optimized for the one platform through and through for it hence why the game still runs smoothly CGI's post doesn't really clear your post because that context doesn't apply here as you're going by the angle of being made for more powerful hardware equals better with this part "because I know that game can do better, than being shackled to lesser hw" when the are examples of that not really being the case such as BOTW's lead platform was Wii U and the was and still is no open world game on more powerful hardware that can do all the things it allows in one single package the in fact isn't a single game period.

If it was about output as CGI said you'd simply play it on a PC emulator after all you legally own the game so that's allowed which calls the post into question as anyway you look at it it just comes across as a pointless bash so I can see why your post was seen as such.

Last edited by Wyrdness - on 02 April 2020

2 was the better game overall. I liked the story in 1 a bit better, but 2 was just more enjoyable in almost every aspect.



Nintendo Switch Friend Code: SW-5643-2927-1984

curl-6 said:

I find this position a curious one.

You say you own a Switch and play it on a daily basis.

But if you care so strongly about graphical performance and want only the best in that regard, why buy or play on a Switch in the first place, or any console for that matter? Why not just play everything on PC at maxed settings?

Are you assuming that I only play just AAA games on PC or something?. 

Going by the way you've written this, I'm going to assume myself that it's not written in a truly curious manner. 



                                       

Wyrdness said:

If it was about output as CGI said you'd simply play it on a PC emulator after all you legally own the game so that's allowed which calls the post into question as anyway you look at it it just comes across as a pointless bash so I can see why your post was seen as such.

Except I had already stated that I didn't buy the second game, and never really wanted to. I said I could emu it if I so desired, and no, we're not going down that route of calling "what if" into question, because that doesn't even begin to fit into the topic itself, and just serves as an opener for a completely different topic (which easily screams to bash).

CGI saw it as it was, and so did I. He needed to absolutely calm down, and so did anyone who deliberately read it as such and got their feathers ruffled. 


Also, I'd just like to point out that a select few (even OP) have chosen to steer the topic completely off course. I'd say we keep things on course, instead of trying to start something from nothing (lest CGI have to intervene again).

Last edited by Chazore - on 03 April 2020

                                       

Chazore said:

Except I had already stated that I didn't buy the second game, and never really wanted to. I said I could emu it if I so desired, and no, we're not going down that route of calling "what if" into question, because that doesn't even begin to fit into the topic itself, and just serves as an opener for a completely different topic (which easily screams to bash).

CGI saw it as it was, and so did I. He needed to absolutely calm down, and so did anyone who deliberately read it as such and got their feathers ruffled. 


Also, I'd just like to point out that a select few (even OP) have chosen to steer the topic completely off course. I'd say we keep things on course, instead of trying to start something from nothing (lest CGI have to intervene again).

You say you're not going down the route of what if as it doesn't fit into the topic but that is exactly what your post did to begin with you steered the topic down this path to begin with sure they need a more reserved reaction but on the flip side that part of your post wasn't called for in any context what so ever so you can't really complain about the reactions this is why even the op as well is pressing you on the issue.