Forums - Gaming Discussion - Difficulty vs Accessibility: A responsibility for the developers, not for the players.

I got Dark Souls very cheap on Steam and tried to get into it. I gave up on the goat boss since I got annoyed of backtracking all the way to him just to be killed in 5 secs.
Power to the developer to make the games they want, but at the same time I won't spend any money on the franchise.
I like the lore, the world design, but if I am not having fun, then I can't help it. I would welcome an easier mode. Enemies doing less damage is more than enough for me.



Intel Core i7 8700K | 32 GB DDR 4 PC 3200 | ROG STRIX Z370-F Gaming | Nvidia RTX 2080 Ti 11GB VRAM | Asus PG27UQ gaming on 3840 x 2160 @120 Hz GSYNC HDR| HTC Vive Pro :3

Reached PC master race level.

Around the Network

Dark Souls should add an easy mode. The catch is,the only difference is a mini map. Nothing else is different.

That said I love the atmosphere of Bloodborne or a Dark Souls but I'm not a fan of the combat and I was never a fan of having to replay areas over and over as messing up. So I gave up on BB and DS1.My patience is just thin on those kinds of games.



Bite my shiny metal Cockpit!

Don't mind difficult games, but that should be determined via AI and not mere bullet sponges. Dark souls has a strange interpretation of difficulty, therefore they are not fun at all.



Cheat codes are fun.

They can also serve as an additional point of entry to the 'true' game, by allowing an unskilled player the chance to learn the game mechanics at their own pace without the stress of dying.

Or just let players break the game for their own amusement.

None of this affects you, let everyone enjoy games as they please.



Xxain said:
Nevermind, I had to wake up. I get what the thread title is saying. Yes, When a game is made to be difficult, it goes beyond just values.

Now I play the part of the opposition: If I want to play a easy mode in a Souls game where the values are just slashed across the board, how does that effect YOUR ability to enjoy the game? You just told us that the developer should be the ones deciding the difficulty/accessibility of the game and not player; the player also should not be concerned about how other players decide to enjoy the game even if it does not represent the developers vision. You play the way the game is supposed to play played and you let them play wrong. That's their business, not yours.

If a game is supposed to be hard, then so be it.

If a game is supposed to be easy, then so be it.

I mean, everyone is entitled to complain.I certainly wished many games were harder, but it is what it is.It's just that simple.



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1

Around the Network
mysteryman said:
Cheat codes are fun.

They can also serve as an additional point of entry to the 'true' game, by allowing an unskilled player the chance to learn the game mechanics at their own pace without the stress of dying.

Or just let players break the game for their own amusement.

None of this affects you, let everyone enjoy games as they please.

But if a developer dont want to, because that's how they designed their game, why should it have cheat codes or an easy mode?

It's not a matter of having fun or not;Clearly people are having fun with those games.With each new entry, From is selling more and more.Code Vein just reported that it sold more than 1 million units, and Dead Cells is a huge success.

Its a matter of just the game itself not being appealing to these gamers in particular.Much like I dont like racing game in general and I can do nothing about this, nothing can be done to tailor these games to people that dont like the challenge.That's all.



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1

Celeste is a great example of a game that mixed difficulty and accessibility in a perfect way. There's readily available options from the get-go that allows you to tweak some parameters of the game: infinite stamina, invincibility, slowing the game down, etc... Even without using those options, the game makes dying more part of the experience than a punishment for screwing up, every new screen is a check point and when you die, you respawn instantly ready to try again. This makes even the craziest of sequences appear doable since you know you get unlimited tries and that you only have to succeed once.



Signature goes here!

First of all, this is a great topic and a case well-made!

As someone who really likes many games that people tend to find very challenging (like Crypt of the NecroDancer, Diaries of a Spaceport Janitor, etc.) and also of many that are literally impossible to fail (like the interactive novel Butterfly Soup), to me the measure of a game's greatness isn't in whether it's easy or difficult, but in whether it sets out to do something that resonates with me and accomplishes that goal.

(I also enjoy Dark Souls!)



Nautilus said:
Xxain said:
Nevermind, I had to wake up. I get what the thread title is saying. Yes, When a game is made to be difficult, it goes beyond just values.

Now I play the part of the opposition: If I want to play a easy mode in a Souls game where the values are just slashed across the board, how does that effect YOUR ability to enjoy the game? You just told us that the developer should be the ones deciding the difficulty/accessibility of the game and not player; the player also should not be concerned about how other players decide to enjoy the game even if it does not represent the developers vision. You play the way the game is supposed to play played and you let them play wrong. That's their business, not yours.

If a game is supposed to be hard, then so be it.

If a game is supposed to be easy, then so be it.

I mean, everyone is entitled to complain.I certainly wished many games were harder, but it is what it is.It's just that simple.

This was a weak ass response. You just should put more effort into engaging in your own thread. At the very least you can address the part about you being a hypocrite.



Xxain said:
Nautilus said:

If a game is supposed to be hard, then so be it.

If a game is supposed to be easy, then so be it.

I mean, everyone is entitled to complain.I certainly wished many games were harder, but it is what it is.It's just that simple.

This was a weak ass response. You just should put more effort into engaging in your own thread. At the very least you can address the part about you being a hypocrite.

If you want a better response, then read the OP.Its all there.

And I wasnt giving you a "pretty weak ass response".I mean it.If the developer wants its game to be more easy in nature, to be more lighthearted, go for it.That game shouldnt have a harder difficulty option, no matter if I think otherwise.The same stands true for difficult games.If I or you end buying it, well thats a different story.

Truck gave a nice example for games that can soften the blow, so to say, with more constant checkpoints like Celeste for example, but not only that dosent work for all games, but also not all games need to cater to you.Simple as that.



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1