LurkerJ said:
I think smokers, boozers, addicts, and those who are obese and don't exercise should pay more taxes. If those who don't wish to take the vaccine end up in the hospital, they should be taxed more. Obviously the issue here is that the majority of unvaccinated people won't need public services to support them unless they get severe or long COVID19, so only start taxing them if they fall ill? I truly believe there should be harsher consequences for anyone who thinks my taxes are there to fund their smoking-induced COPD/diabetes treatments, nothing more off putting than seeing a grown ass adult with a cigarette. |
The problem with this, is you'd end up with some rarer situations where people who'd rather not get vaxed, due avoiding extra taxation, out of necessity or not, are going to take the vax. For those few who get severely negatively impacted, or killed because of it, how does the system respond? Do you just turn a blind eye or pay their family reparations? How much if so? Would reparations be enough?
The problem is, who to sacrifice in what situations, and nobody wants the answer to be themselves or their loved ones, and it's understandable why. What's hard to understand is how exactly to deal with those problems, and the answer is always somewhat flawed.
PS1 - ! - We must build a console that can alert our enemies.
PS2 - @- We must build a console that offers online living room gaming.
PS3 - #- We must build a console that’s powerful, social, costs and does everything.
PS4 - $- We must build a console that’s affordable, charges for services, and pumps out exclusives.
PRO -%-We must build a console that's VR ready, checkerboard upscales, and sells but a fraction of the money printer.
PS5 - ^ -We must build a console that’s a generational cross product, with RT lighting, and price hiking.
PRO -&- We must build a console that Super Res upscales and continues the cost increases.












