You misquoted me. I don't know Trump's intentions, but 'His base believe he was just doing his job'. That's pretty clear.

Yeah it was a huge mistake to get Guliani involved. I think he did it because he trusts Guliani and he doesn't trust most of the staff that have been there before his Presidency. It's not a justification though, it makes it look like he just does whatever he wants. But it also jeopardises his case for the reasons you said. It makes it look like he might try to claim Attorney/Client privilege. If he does claim that, we'll know he's guilty. But that's probably illegal in matters of state anyway and he'd be impeached straight away. Lol.

Why are all headlines saying Trump is impeached when he's not impeached at all and most likely never will be?

If Pelosi ever gets around to submitting the paperwork to the Senate he will be. The media are just getting ahead of themselves. He won't be removed though because the Senate will reject it.

That is the point, if he was doing things along the legal way, he would not need to TRUST someone.  If he was following the proper channels there really isn't a need for Giuliani.  I still believe Trump could have accomplish his goal without Guiliani but of course it would have taken a lot more effort because he would need to side step a lot of either illegal, immoral or both when conducting business.  Guiliani bypass all of that because he works directly for Trump.  Trump doesn't have to care when his administration tell him this is illegal, or this violates this or that.

When you take into account how Trump used his last lawyer, Guiliani makes total sense why Trump would use him in this scenario.  It's not because Trump trust Guiliani, its because this is how Trump has always handled gray area dealings.  Trump believes by using a lawyer it shields him from prosecution.  If dirty deeds are found, the lawyer takes the fall not him.  Trump tries to make sure there is no records of his dealings so when the Lawyer runs afoul of the law, then it's his words against Trump.  Its basic mafia type of stuff but it works pretty good on the government level as well.

The reason we are here is that Trump still thinks he can operate like he did as a private citizen, that he can still use the same tactics he used for shady business dealings.  Those tactics do not work the same as a public official and its the reason he fell into this obvious predicament.  The blessing for Trump is that the GOP will do whatever it takes to continue to protect him all the while they probably hate his guts.

Looks like I completely misunderstood that word. So it actually means absolutely nothing and just is a fancy thing to say when a president was naughty.

So why is everyone talking about impeachment instead of removal of office? That's like constantly talking about going to the movies but never actually talking about the movies. This whole thing is a fucking circus. Which is quite fitting considering the president is a clown.

You got what you said you'd be happy to receive: "a link to some concrete stuff".  

Do your reading (I sure did).  Then get back to me.

By then he knows it backfired..... so ofcourse he doesnt say it, then, when asked directly.
Trump knows well when he breaks the law, and how to get around it.

Supposedly Guliani doesnt have security clearance to do what he did either.
Trump trust him, to do whatever hes told, even if not legal.

Which is why when Guliani tells someone else what to do, as the voice of the president,
Its not because "he mis-understood trump" or "made up his own mind on behalf of the president" or such.

Trump is playing the system, clearly abuseing it and breaking the law, and knows how to get around it.

His "base" is either gulible enough to be lied too, or dont care.

Well actually its not a fancy word but you can consider being Impeach as like having a grand jury decide that their is a case worthy to go to trial over.  Now its up to the Senate to do their jobs and try the case.  As we know, the GOP controls the Senate so the chance of the GOP ruling against Trump is slim UNLESS, there was a silent vote, then things could get very interesting.  

What I do not understand by your response is that you believe just because the chance is slim to remove Trump from office, this is a circus.  Actually what we get to see is how each side handles this situation.  Currently there have been a few GOP members who have come out publicly saying they will work with the President and his lawyers so he doesn't face prosecution.  Now if that were to happen in a real court of law, that person would instantly be removed from the proceedings.  There are Dems who state they would vote to prosecute before a trial even happen, the same goes for them as well.  The thing is, what we should see is the process work the way it suppose to be.  That the president goes on trial, evidence, sworn testimony, documents you name it is presented to the court and then a decision is made.  If one party or the other decides to not do their job, then they should face the consequences.

Things should become more interesting once things are push to the Senate.  We get to see how all the actors perform and then we can see if how the country response afterwards.