Locknuts said:
SuaveSocialist said:
Then why are you talking to me? You haven't even read the evidence yet. By your own admission, you have not finished your reading. Not only have you neglected to read Section 2, Section 1 directs you to the Endnotes over one thousand times, many such instances directing you to additional required reading, and by your own admission you haven't even consulted it yet.
This hilariously debunks your claim that you "read the relevant parts". To the contrary, it suggests you merely skimmed the document, (badly, I might add). I see no evidence that you went any further than the second page of the Preface.
Do your reading. Then back to me.
|
You're being disingenuous.
|
You got what you said you'd be happy to receive: "a link to some concrete stuff".
Do your reading (I sure did). Then get back to me.
