Bolded: Please do not take that quote as wisdom as it is a rather stupid saying.

Coincidences happen all the time,constantly.

It's the first line from the video in op. I wasn't using it seriously, quite the opposite.

Errrr... I'm not sure if you're implying I did, but I don't think I dramatized anyone to the point of being villainous. 

Agreeing to disagree is fine, but I personally don't think that should be the response the moment your view is challenged.  That should come after you've honestly considered and responded to the other position.

Bolded: If someone does dramatize others to the extreme of being villainous for just having a different opinion than that same person might have a more fruitfull venture looking into him/herself for why they think that certain way.(i'm sorry if it came across personal but it was not meant that way)

Agreeing to disagree is fine imo when there is no chance you will convince your opponent to consider your views,it might be best to move one to friendlier grounds and it might be more worth it to come back to earlier arguments when there has been some connections made with that opponent.

He deserves more internet fame for shooting down such a pernicious accusation.

Ironically, his work show far more research than that of the professor from a law school with a top ranked IP law program...

Seriously.  The moment he predicted her upcoming comparisons you could tell she relied on hearsay.

I'd be willing to bet that some student did the research and she didn't bother to look it up. By the time it actually picked up steam, it was too late for her to backtrack as it was published.  I'm actually working on stuff that may become part of a law school casebook right now.  Hopefully, my Professor does a better job of checking my research XD.