Chazore said:
What gets me, is how it's supposedly absent for desktop cards, but it's going to be there for next gen systems, I mean how do you fuck up that hard?. All Nvidia has to do now is just release a more efficient high and middle end card or 3, that all dabble in RT, and do it more efficiently, while AMD sits there with no desktop card capable of doing it, yet consoles apparently will. This has to be some sort of stupid fuck up. |
Next gen consoles aren't happening until late 2020... By then AMD will have RDNA fully sorted with Ray Tracing support.
Barkley said: Full list of games that officially support ray tracing:
The support just isn't there yet. No Ray Tracing support isn't a deal breaker for me. |
Allot of modders have been going back and modding old games to support Ray Tracing, so that is by far not a definitive list of Ray Traced games on PC.
fatslob-:O said:
I was mostly posting in relation to GCN rather than RDNA so I don't know how much of this is true for the latter ... With RDNA, we're getting both a SIMD64 and a SIMD32 mode ... |
Interesting. If that is the case it would still take two cycles on RDNA... Still better than GCN though.
I would expect SIMD32 to be the most common mode as it just fits perfectly with the architecture.
shikamaru317 said: The pricing is terrible. All pre-release rumors over the last couple of years pegged Navi as a replacement for Polaris, not as a replacement for Vega. The whole point of these cards according to leaks was that they would offer Vega tier performance at Polaris tier prices (less than $300). Now we find out they are ridiculously overpriced. What a major hype killer for a mid-range gamer like myself. Who knows how long we will have to wait on a $250 Navi card now, and even if we get one the performance won't be a huge increase over the current 580. |
The RX 480 8GB when it launched was $239 with the 4GB model coming at $199. So the average selling price has jumped a little... But keep in mind that GDDR6 is a relatively new DRAM technology as well as 7nm and thus the Navi GPU's should fetch a premium for the short term.
The RX 590 dropped at $279, which isn't that much below a Navi GPU.
AMD needs the higher average selling prices to drive home profits now, if they aren't super competitive with nVidia though, expect a plethora of price cuts.
EricHiggin said: The 5700 keeps that look. A little boring to me. The XT is just different enough to make it interesting but doesn't stray to far from the typical square look. It's like the OG PS4. It's just a two tiered box, but the fact that it's on an angle gives it some flair without going overboard. The 2000 series Nvidia cards do look pretty decent. The AIB's will likely have some better cooling and very well may go with axial fans instead of the blower. Depends on the efficiency and the overclocking capabilities and whether it's worth it or not. They are mid tier cards like Polaris was so. |
The regular 5700 looks far better in my opinion, I like the clean, understated look.
Plus my OCD doesn't really like high frequency patterning. (Aka the lines) on the XT model.
On the bright side, none are pushing RGB.
--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--