You are an Adult... Make it the end of a discussion. Children don't get to control or dictate terms to you.

You are delving into slippery slope arguments, which is a logical fallacy, you need to recognize that and recognize that your line of thinking is highly erroneous due to that very fact.
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/162/Slippery-Slopehttps://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/slippery-slope

The fact of the matter is... Whenever someone has used me as an example of teaching their children about Homosexuality, they left it as "They love each other". - The kids were satisfied with that answer.

I am telling you that you cannot make it the end of the discussion.  Have you listened to a word that I stated.  As the parent if you are not teaching your child someone else will.  If you are not filling in the gap in their knowledge someone else will.  If you are not treating your child with respect to their curiosity and question someone else will.  Just because YOU decide to end the conversation does not mean to the child its ended.  They will seek understanding whether you provide it or not.  The only thing I hear from you is that you tell the kids about homosexuality and that's the end but in reality its the end for you not the parent or the child.  Its only the beginning as any simplistic answer will only satisfy the now not the future.

If you think that talking about two adults showing love and affection to children is suddenly going to turn into a discussion about how individuals fuck each other.. Then you are probably going about it the wrong way, kids don't need to know details like how I went and had sex with 7 different guys at a gay sauna with my partner last weekend... But telling them I love my partner as I hug him after dealing with casualties at a car accident is all that is needed.

It is literally no different talking to a child about how their mum and dad loves each other, there is no further discussion that delves into questionable aspects like you so eloquently describe, it just doesn't happen... It's baseless fear mongering.

If the parents don't have appropriate experience, information or context like you say... Then that just places a larger emphasis on the need of teaching kids about LGBTQI issues in the curriculum does it not? You said it yourself that parents are failing in this area.

This is where I believe you have no experience in this subject.  Yes, telling a child that 2 adults love each other like mom and dad can lead to a discussion about sex.  Since I have had this conversation I know exactly what I am talking about.  Do you believe that children do not get information about sex before their teen years.  I know as a child I knew about sex at 6 years old but did not understand fully.  In today's world there are girls in middle school doing knob jobs on their little boys. Hell, there was an HBO special about the whole thing. I remember hunching a young girl at 7 years old thinking I was having sex.  I am telling you that as a parent, you deal with this stuff all the time or you don't and the child will get their info somewhere else and do experiments with their friends.  This still comes back to what I am saying that this book doesn't do enough and it doesn't fill in the gap thus it's a half measure at a young age.   This doesn't help at all but instead give a chance to have bias introduced before the child reach an age of understanding.

LGBT people are here to stay, they are in the community. Kids are going to see two men holding hands, showing affection and ask questions... Telling a child that it's because those two people love each other isn't the end of the world.

Kids understand the concept of love, apparently than allot of Adults... It's not some dirty, unthinkable topic that should be avoided, LGBT people are part of the real world, they have always existed, will always exist and it's time that some people embraced that very fact and got over it.

As for indoctrination... I think you should be a little more concerned about religion on that front than education on LGBT issues/culture. I mean.. Shit.

The thing is for the world to accept the LGBT community as a whole, you cannot force anything but instead people need to move on from their prejudice.

1). Not to the degree of fear and confusion. Which is the whole premise here. Go back and read my Point 2 above.

2). Sure, but is your niece fearful and confused regarding your brother?  Again, go back and read my Point 2 above.

3). Babies preferring pretty faces has to do with our psychological inclination towards facial symmetry. Further, that's not mocking the non-pretty faces.  It's more of an indifference. Again, Point 2 above.

I disagree on it being a slippery slope, but there isn't a point in us discussing it =]

No it isn't significantly worse. I would the point is that when you prompt situations to kids they will be curious about it, so you don't need to be pointing things that aren't necessary for them to discover before they are curious by themselves.

At BOLD:  This is exactly what you want.  You want them to see it naturally as if this is no different than walking down the street.  What you do not want is it taught as something different or unique where it then can be portrayed as outside the norm.

Actually, I would say that kids do not understand the concept of love instead they understand the feeling of love.  Love to a child is about how they feel not exactly what true love is and love in itself is very complex emotionally.  

I can tell you when I was growing up, I did not get exposed to any homosexual group until my teens but I know for a fact if I was exposed to content like that book while I was 5 years old and went to my mom or dad for context it would not be good.  Their bias on that issue is very set and even today, they are not very open minded on the subject.

Basically what I am saying is that there is a 2 edged sword to this type of material at this young age and there isn't always going to be the happy path where there is understanding and acceptance.  

Sorry, but considering private companies are much better managed than government ones I would say individual people are more qualified than government

It is a logical fallacy. I have provided the necessary evidence and framework to show you that it is.

The kids will be curious once they see two men holding hands or hugging, unless you are suggesting such actions should be forbade in public?

Islam is derived from the same historical context as what the Christians and Jews believe, it's all the same God in the end... There is a reason why the Bible is strictly against Pork like the Quran and Torah.
What the left is generally proposing is for all the middle eastern religions to be treated as equals in all aspects, of course to those who hold extreme prejudices against Islam will see it as some kind of favoritism depending on perspective.

Being anti-religious is inherently non-racist anyway, where the racism generally comes into play is how a certain religion is often associated with a certain racial demographic... Like those of Middle Eastern descent, the far left needs to stop playing the racism card, no doubt.

Either way, it's pretty much irrelevant, we aren't going to change the ideals of either the left or right at the end of the day, so feel free to come join me in the Center. :P

Yes I do. Do you disagree?

A child understands true love, they love their parents, their friends, their family.
Either way... A childs ability to understand the extent of love is not the issue... A child understands that "love" can be like a really strong friendship.

Sorry to hear that.
Homosexuality though is here to stay and children should be taught about LGBT culture and issues... Not so that they don't offend LGBT people, but so if they ever come to terms with their sexuality at a later date they can feel confident that they are allowed to be themselves openly and not shunned away in a closet...

Plus you have the safety issue, the LGBT community isn't all rainbows, lollipops and sunshine, education helps in this aspect as well.

Clearly I am all for it, you aren't, we both have valid reasoning's for our stance.

Private companies aren't better managed. They're just ruthless. It's not that the government is necessarily better at what they are doing but what they do is within certain boundaries and has to adhere to strict rules. Rules that do not apply to moron parents and cutthroat private companies.

If it's about caring for children I will always prefer a regulated service over a private entity that will destroy my child for selfish and ideological reasons.

"Government = bad" is a moronic sentiment perpetuated by idiots and corporations for their own gain.

Yes I do. Do you disagree?

Why would you want a child to see your relationship as different, unique or outside of the norm then any other relationship.  What purpose would that have if you are looking for parity.  If you want to be treated as equals or the same then your relationship is nothing special or different its another relationship.

A child understands true love, they love their parents, their friends, their family.
Either way... A childs ability to understand the extent of love is not the issue... A child understands that "love" can be like a really strong friendship.

Well we will disagree with that.  True love is understanding that it's not all about your emotions and at a child young age everything is about their emotions.  If love was binary then I would agree with what you say but love and explaining the different types between 2 different people isn't some simplistic message.

Sorry to hear that.
Homosexuality though is here to stay and children should be taught about LGBT culture and issues... Not so that they don't offend LGBT people, but so if they ever come to terms with their sexuality at a later date they can feel confident that they are allowed to be themselves openly and not shunned away in a closet...

Plus you have the safety issue, the LGBT community isn't all rainbows, lollipops and sunshine, education helps in this aspect as well.

Clearly I am all for it, you aren't, we both have valid reasoning's for our stance.

Not sure what you are sorry for.  I am perfectly happy with my upbringing and my parents but just like any person, you are your own person.

Homesexuality has been here since time started, not sure if you have to tell me that it's here to stay.  I will say that no child needs to be taught about LGBT culture unless they want to learn about it.  It's not something that needs to be forced then any other culture and its definitely no different or special then any other culture.  I will definitely say I have a different stance but that's because I do not see the LGBT community any different than any other community.

If my children want to learn about LGBT community and culture more power to then but it will be their decision not someone else making it for them. 

Anybody and everybody. Muslim, Christian, agnostic, homophobe, etc...

Some people project their own prejudice, hate, fear, confusion and bigotry onto 5 year olds.

Companies are held to much more rules, you often will see prosecution against private companies but public companies being less likely to be persecuted.

There is no free service, it is covered by taxes and the lack of need of profit makes them less motivated. Usually you pay through taxes for a worse service with a government overhead.

Government and personal also have selfish and ideological reasons.

Shall I understand that you are calling me idiot?