Food production can afford to be so energy inefficient because without the taxes that get it expensive for road transport use, fuel is still quite cheap, this is bad for the environment, but at the same time it can help avoiding a disaster on this front, as if and when it will be really necessary, there will be plenty of room for efficiency improvements, not to mention that the rich part of the world currently wastes an awful and shameful amount of food, we can and we must improve on that front too.
It's more likely that agriculture (and breeding and some food processing too) will have to become very soon a lot more efficient on water use, I guess.

But who will pay for it? I like my money and I don't want to spend it on polder for the goddamn dutch.

Pay for what?

There is growing sentiment that global warming will have minimal impact. I saw an article a few weeks back saying that somewhere around 70% said minimal to no impact based on a survey of climatologist and meteorologist, but for the life of me I can't find the original article, which wasn't from a biased source. Now all I can find is one from Britbart, which pisses me off, because I wouldn't believe it if it was the only place I found it. But here it is: https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2015/07/31/new-study-majority-of-climate-scientists-dont-agree-with-consensus/

It at least has a link to the actual study. Here's another link from National Association of scholars where it's estimated to be closer to 40% - https://www.nas.org/articles/Estimated_40_Percent_of_Scientists_Doubt_Manmade_Global_Warming

I don't know about global warming, I'm not qualified - but I am gaining steam in believing Google is filtering its results to not show dissenting opinions. I could find none of them using Google, a few more using Edge, and the most using DuckDuckGo. Feel free to experiment by typing anything about a study going against the consensus of global warming among the different search engines and you'll see it too. Basically Google just pulled up articles confirming Global Warming and one about how Americans deny it because they're dumb. Never really believed they were filtering (I guess) conservative content till now.

Its all just a coincidence that as CO2 concentration rises, our global temp. on the planet does as well right?
People are drawing the wrong conclusions? and its in no way man made?

Nothing to worry about right?

I hope you are being sarcastic since 97% of climate scientists have researched and agreed that man made climate change is real. I'll only listen to people who spent their lives researching this stuff. Not anyone else whether they are the smartest physicist, some huge world leader or an idiot on the internet. I don't care how dmart you are, it's not what you dedicated your life researching. And I want actual proof of a conspiracy if 97% of all climate scientists are telling a lie and the proof needs to be indisputable since our specie's existence depends on it

Building higher levees in the Netherlands.

Though considering he's German, he should be worrying more about Friesland, which would be equally affected. All those jokes being lost...

Well, nobody should be paying for anyone else's stuff.  Dissolve the EU and part of that problem will be solved.