Let see....
PS4 ends up 130m-140m
XB1 ends up 50-60m
Switch ends up ~70-80m ?
Potentially it might actually stay above 50%.
Though xbox + nintendo should be able to not give sony that much market share.
Do you think it'll be over 50% when all's said and done? | |||
Yes | 35 | 44.87% | |
No | 43 | 55.13% | |
Total: | 78 |
Let see....
PS4 ends up 130m-140m
XB1 ends up 50-60m
Switch ends up ~70-80m ?
Potentially it might actually stay above 50%.
Though xbox + nintendo should be able to not give sony that much market share.
Also, in addition to lowballing the PS4's lifetime sales, it baffles me how people continue to similarly lowball the Switch. Honestly, any number below 80 million seems rather absurd at this point. It's selling on par with the PS4 and is one of the fastest selling systems ever, it would be basically unheard of for such a system to fall short of 80 million lifetime. It's going to be more than half of that before it's even 3 years old.
curl-6 said: The poll is pretty much a tie right now, so half of all voters think PS4 will outsell Xbox One and Switch combined.
I keep hearing that PS4 is nearing saturation, and yet it still keeps selling at a monstrous pace. Even if we ignore Nintendo/The Wii, PS4 + Xbone are still a good 40 million units short of PS3 + 360, and that's not accounting for population growth. Most of that 40 million will go to the PS4, so I'd say 120 million is the absolute minimum, with 130 more likely and 150 a strong possibility. |
Yes PS4 is doing fantastic and 120M seems like lower limit and 150 not impossible. But Switch will do good number plus X1 is not that shabby. It's hard to achieve 50% with this level of competition.
GProgrammer said: Its going to be hard but possible, remember the OP is talking about the front page, so this is only considering up to the launch of the PS5 and xbox one 2. so probably end 2020. Reasons It has a handy lead at the moment It has been outselling the Switch this year, and this is with Switch having nearly all its big games released I assume next year will see the release of the biggest franchise of all time, which won't be on the Switch, and only released on the PC months later. GTA6 |
Seeing from this angle then it's very possible.
curl-6 said: Also, in addition to lowballing the PS4's lifetime sales, it baffles me how people continue to similarly lowball the Switch. Honestly, any number below 80 million seems rather absurd at this point. It's selling on par with the PS4 and is one of the fastest selling systems ever, it would be basically unheard of for such a system to fall short of 80 million lifetime. It's going to be more than half of that before it's even 3 years old. |
You know you can't have both =p if Switch keep selling at PS4 rate then PS4 can't have 50% marketshare
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
DonFerrari said:
You know you can't have both =p if Switch keep selling at PS4 rate then PS4 can't have 50% marketshare |
I'm not "having both", I think PS4 will end up with less than 50% marketshare. I just think people are lowballing both PS4 and Switch lifetime numbers. Slightly over 100 million for Switch and slightly over 140 million for PS4 would be my estimates if I had to guess.
ironmanDX said: Nope. Switch is gen 9 though. |
Generally though it i not. And I personally I think people estimate the release of the PS/Xbox successors way too early.
curl-6 said:
I'm not "having both", I think PS4 will end up with less than 50% marketshare. I just think people are lowballing both PS4 and Switch lifetime numbers. 100 million for Switch and 140 million for PS4 would be my estimates if I had to guess. |
I know you aren't, I was just joking.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
DonFerrari said:
I know you aren't, I was just joking. |
Ah, my bad, I am chronically incapable of detecting sarcasm. XD
curl-6 said:
Ah, my bad, I am chronically incapable of detecting sarcasm. XD |
And I'm lifely impaired on being funny.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
Hiku said: That'll be hard.
I look at it this way. |
Thats how I have always looked at it to. But I keep hearing 9th gen. How or why is the switch a 9th gen console when it was released smack dab in the middle of the 8th gen and has games from other 8th gen consoles and will be unable to run the 9th gen games as dictated by those consoles successors.
Intrinsic said:
Thats how I have always looked at it to. But I keep hearing 9th gen. How or why is the switch a 9th gen console when it was released smack dab in the middle of the 8th gen and has games from other 8th gen consoles and will be unable to run the 9th gen games as dictated by those consoles successors. |
I can imagine customers scratching their heads when they say their console is the only current gen (can't say next gen anymore after 2 years on the market) but can't run games the old gen is getting now due to being a weaker HW. Makes a lot of sense in electronics to buy current gen for more expensive but less capable than last gen HW.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."