By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Shadow of the Tomb Raider Review Thread - Meta PC/PS4/XB1 81/78/83

John2290 said:
Chazore said:

I honestly think the game in general is average across the board, but people who think one console's reviews make the game overall "crappy" is pulling a bit of a stretch. That'd be like me saying a PC game was reviewed poorly, then gets ported to consoles and gets positive reviews, but then I usdee PC reviews to call it an "objectively crappy game". 

Yeah, Rise added on to what the 2013 reboot created and it seems like Shadow is adding further on from Rise. This title isn't even exclusive or timed though, so the ill felt from the sequel 3 years ago shouldn't really be held in contempt towards the new game (that they have even yet to play). 

Nah, this covers multiple fronts. Those who aren't interested in the game will see it as ssame old/mediocre and those interested in it already have set their own expectations for it. Thosethat have played and reviewed it think it's decent and not bad already.

Timed exclusivity shouldn't really play into any part of the game itself and it's quality, because then we'd have to apply that to every other system and those timed deals made as well (which we know will either be excused or denied).

It came out for two platforms, both of which were out there and able to be purchased from. THe only delay for the game was it's PS4 release, but we've also seen this delay happen with Crash Trilogy for example, and that game still got good reviews and enough people who waited to purchase or double dipped with it.

I'm not desperate to buy it as I've still got the previous title to play myself, but I'm more interested in JC4, so that lands at the top of my priority play list. 

Check Divinity os2's ps4 and xbox review scores, difference. There are many other games like this with discrepancy of scores, being higher on x1. Whatever the case for it may be, it's not your conspiracy theory, that's for sure. 

Divinity os 2 has a very small number of reviews, so there is more possibility of a bigger gap in scores. However, Tomb raider has 40 reviews each now and it still hasn't evened out....its not a coincidence. 

Keep in mind in that in addition to timed exclusivity, the sottr also called the tlou graphics fake, all the more reason for PS4 reviewers to have a grudge on him.

Despite PS exclusives, Xbox and PS4 share 95% of their libraries. The "PS has move quality exclusives" is true, but if that affected the reviews most games would have a bigger difference in there metas, not just one game. Stop with the tin foil hat speculation, please.



Bet with Intrinsic:

The Switch will outsell 3DS (based on VGchartz numbers), according to me, while Intrinsic thinks the opposite will hold true. One month avatar control for the loser's avatar.

Around the Network
Chazore said:
shikamaru317 said:

I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks the main reason the PS4 version meta'd 6 points lower than XB1 with the same number of reviews is because the PS4 exclusive publications are still salty about Rise being timed. If you disregard those salty PS4 exclusive reviews, the average across all platforms is a point or two above 80, which really isn't bad at all. 

I honestly think the game in general is average across the board, but people who think one console's reviews make the game overall "crappy" is pulling a bit of a stretch. That'd be like me saying a PC game was reviewed poorly, then gets ported to consoles and gets positive reviews, but then I usdee PC reviews to call it an "objectively crappy game". 

flashfire926 said:

It's good that I'm not the only one who came to that conclusion.

People were generally high on the reboot, and then for some reason hated rise, even though they were so similar, and the gameplay in rise was objectively an improvement.

Then people turned on the reboot too, and acted as if they hated it from the start. The 6-point difference between PS4/XB1 isnt a coincidence

Yeah, Rise added on to what the 2013 reboot created and it seems like Shadow is adding further on from Rise. This title isn't even exclusive or timed though, so the ill felt from the sequel 3 years ago shouldn't really be held in contempt towards the new game (that they have even yet to play). 

Kerotan said:

I think you forgot to quote me. 

 

I lost interest in the series because in the time it was delayed too many other good games came out. Maybe if rise of the tomb raider goes on ps plus I'll play it the same way I played the 2013 reboot. 

Nah, this covers multiple fronts. Those who aren't interested in the game will see it as ssame old/mediocre and those interested in it already have set their own expectations for it. Thosethat have played and reviewed it think it's decent and not bad already.

Timed exclusivity shouldn't really play into any part of the game itself and it's quality, because then we'd have to apply that to every other system and those timed deals made as well (which we know will either be excused or denied).

It came out for two platforms, both of which were out there and able to be purchased from. THe only delay for the game was it's PS4 release, but we've also seen this delay happen with Crash Trilogy for example, and that game still got good reviews and enough people who waited to purchase or double dipped with it.

I'm not desperate to buy it as I've still got the previous title to play myself, but I'm more interested in JC4, so that lands at the top of my priority play list. 

I'm the same as you. Not desperate to play and I've a ton of other top quality ps4 games to play both exclusives and multiplat.

 

I'm not avoiding their games because of a protest. I'm avoiding because i lost interest while they were not on my platform. They missed their chance. Same with pubg. 

 

Tomb raider still sold very well on ps4 despite the delay. Better then xbox version even. But they surely lost a ton of sales being late. I speak for myself when I say I've lost interest in the series not everybody on ps4. 



Since Tales of Vesperia Definitive Edition doesn't come out until January the 11th I might buy this sooner than planned. If its on sale for a decent price digitally with all the DLC on Black Friday I will probably buy it then.



John2290 said:
flashfire926 said:

Divinity os 2 has a very small number of reviews, so there is more possibility of a bigger gap in scores. However, Tomb raider has 40 reviews each now and it still hasn't evened out....its not a coincidence. 

Keep in mind in that in addition to timed exclusivity, the sottr also called the tlou graphics fake, all the more reason for PS4 reviewers to have a grudge on him.

Despite PS exclusives, Xbox and PS4 share 95% of their libraries. The "PS has move quality exclusives" is true, but if that affected the reviews most games would have a bigger difference in there metas, not just one game. Stop with the tin foil hat speculation, please.

You're calling me the tin foil hat wearer. I'm saying the reason for the difference is most likely something way more simple than malice... how did I become the conspiracy theorist when Chazore believes there to be a grudge against Shadow for timed exclusivity in Rise. Smh. 

And 95%, nah. You're forgetting about VR games, Japanese and Asain territory only games, Xboxes BC library and the indies which make the gap much larger. Show me a source fir that 95 percent. 

Well within the context we are talking about, most reviewers are NA/EU based so the Japan/Asia only games don't count in this scenario, since they aren't really a factor here.

And you really think VR counts? Those games are gated behind a peripheral that costs as much as the console itself, those don't count in the slightest. Same as kinect games. I'm talking about real games here.

Yes, you're right in that when we include Asia/Japan exclusives then the percentage is much lower, but those really aren't applicable here.

And reviewers do sometimes rate a game higher/lower cause of malice/biases. Far Cry 5 got got a low review score from quite a few because it didn't try to make a political statement that antagonizes the rights. 

Chazore is completely right on this one. The timed exclusivity, plus the smack they talked to Naughty Dog is huge factor in the discrepancy in the metascore. It's clear as day. 



Bet with Intrinsic:

The Switch will outsell 3DS (based on VGchartz numbers), according to me, while Intrinsic thinks the opposite will hold true. One month avatar control for the loser's avatar.

CGI-Quality said:
shikamaru317 said:
Interesting to see XB1 6 points higher with only 2 less reviews than PS4. Maybe the PS4 version has bugs or performance issues that aren't present on Xbox?

None of the reviews have stated such. It's mostly a publication difference.

I wonder if ps4 reviewers are viewing it through uncharted-tinted lenses where subconsciously (or overtly) they are comparing it to the UC series. Or on the flip side maybe PC and Xbox gamers haven't had that comparison. 

Or it could be that after ROTR was delayed on ps4, there is a bit of ill feeling towards its successor (even if subconsciously.

Very interesting  

Last edited by fauzman - on 10 September 2018

<a href="https://psnprofiles.com/fauzman"><img src="https://card.psnprofiles.com/2/fauzman.png" border="0"></a>

Around the Network
John2290 said:
flashfire926 said:

Well within the context we are talking about, most reviewers are NA/EU based so the Japan/Asia only games don't count in this scenario, since they aren't really a factor here.

And you really think VR counts? Those games are gated behind a peripheral that costs as much as the console itself, those don't count in the slightest. Same as kinect games. I'm talking about real games here.

Yes, you're right in that when we include Asia/Japan exclusives then the percentage is much lower, but those really aren't applicable here.

And reviewers do sometimes rate a game higher/lower cause of malice/biases. Far Cry 5 got got a low review score from quite a few because it didn't try to make a political statement that antagonizes the rights. 

Chazore is completely right on this one. The timed exclusivity, plus the smack they talked to Naughty Dog is huge factor in the discrepancy in the metascore. It's clear as day. 

Reviewers on ps4 colluded to bomb the game because of timed exclusivity on the previous entry that got great reviews when hitting ps4 after the timed deal was up. 88 up from 86 on the xbox one. 

...okay then. And I'm the tin foil hatter. Lol. 

though that was before they talked shit about Naughty Dog, may I add. And the PS4 game was actually better due to it having all of the dlc content.

In this case, it's the exact game. Hear me out: EXACT SAME GAME. A six point difference doesn't just happen out of thin air, it usually happens when reviewers prefer one game over another. This just screams fishy.



Bet with Intrinsic:

The Switch will outsell 3DS (based on VGchartz numbers), according to me, while Intrinsic thinks the opposite will hold true. One month avatar control for the loser's avatar.

fauzman said:
CGI-Quality said:

None of the reviews have stated such. It's mostly a publication difference.

I wonder if ps4 reviewers are viewing it through uncharted-tinted lenses where subconsciously (or overtly) they are comparing it to the UC series. Or on the flip side maybe PC and Xbox gamers haven't had that comparison. 

 

Or it could be that after ROTR was delayed on ps4, there is a bit of ill feeling towards its successor (even if subconsciously.

 

Very interesting  

most likely both of those factors combined, imo.



Bet with Intrinsic:

The Switch will outsell 3DS (based on VGchartz numbers), according to me, while Intrinsic thinks the opposite will hold true. One month avatar control for the loser's avatar.

Why are people claiming saltiness with PS4 owners? Two points: 1. The PC version is already down to an 81 after only 10 reviews, and based on history, the more reviews a game gets, the lower the score becomes; so, the PC score will likely resemble the PS4 score more than the XBO score. 2. One could conversely make the argument that XBO reviewers are inflating the scores bc the series has come to mean more bc of its timed exclusive history.

Anyway, TR1 had excellent combat but little else. RotTR felt very similar in combat/gameplay to TR1 and still had a poor story (albeit better than TR1) and uninteresting characters. I lost interest in this series, and the scores for this game are not changing my mind.



John2290 said:

It could perhaps be that PS4 exclusives are of a higher qaulity and effect the judgment of this game as it's held to a higher standard. PS4 reviewers had GoW, Horizon and Spiderman since RoTR released. Don't go straight to conspiracy to bomb the game when the truth is probably that simple, it's not as good as the games on Ps4 but better than Xbox exclusives and the reviewers have different standards. 

Maybe it's because people can actually hold a grudge. We both know that different people hold different standards, and I'm going to be honest ehre, I've pretty high standards of what I'd like/expect to see in AAA video games, and those aren't PS4 based, and I'm not alone on that either, so no, it's not really some nutcase conspiracy, people have actually displayed holding grudges both on here and on other sites for years. 

John2290 said:

Check Divinity os2's ps4 and xbox review scores, difference. There are many other games like this with discrepancy of scores, being higher on x1. Whatever the case for it may be, it's not your conspiracy theory, that's for sure. 

Then it's clear that a game can appear bad to some folks on one system, good on another. There isn't one base thinking a game is shit, thus making the game shit by textbook definition. 



Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.

Kerotan said: 

I'm not avoiding their games because of a protest. I'm avoiding because i lost interest while they were not on my platform. They missed their chance. Same with pubg. 

 

Tomb raider still sold very well on ps4 despite the delay. Better then xbox version even. But they surely lost a ton of sales being late. I speak for myself when I say I've lost interest in the series not everybody on ps4. 

I don't see it as a missed chance tbh, because we've seen this across multiple platforms for years. It's like saying it's only a missed chance when Sony is excluded for a period of time, which is really stretching it.

RotTR was also supported on X1X was it not?, which I imagine would make it the definitive version on consoles.



Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.