The fortnite mobile version proves that mobile performance for gaming is greatly exaggerated.

Galaxy s9 officially has 350 gigaflops (exynos version), the snapdragon 845 has 737 gigaflops but this in fp16 so we need to halve it, then we get 368 gigaflops. We don't know the gigaflops number for the iphone 8/X as Apple won't reveal it. 

https://www.anandtech.com/show/13039/the-lg-g7-review/3

According to anandtech, most phones GPU loses between 50-20% performance when pushed to the max (in the manhattan 3.1 offscreen test). But this is only when pushing the gpu to the max, what happens when a game pushes the CPU and GPU to the max at the same time? We get performance worse than Switch console in undocked mode.

Switch has 150 gigaflops when undocked.

So 13 years later Nintendo switch(undocked) and top smartphones still can't beat Xbox 360, that console have 240 gigaflops :)

https://www.anandtech.com/show/13039/the-lg-g7-review/3

@pemalite, please explain to him thats not how flops work.

Here we go again.
Gigaflops isn't the be-all, end-all in regards to performance.
A GPU with less Gigaflops can beat a GPU with more Gigaflops.

The newer the GPU, generally the more efficient it is and the more powerful it is.

Top Smartphones and the Switch are most certainly superior to the Xbox 360 in every scenario that actually matters.

I have multiple times before I think, even with a ton of evidence backing up my claims.

That is because phones have had a big jump, the SoC's in Phones are seeing the largest and fastest technological progress in the industry right now.

But it is also a testament to how efficient and how well Unreal Engine can scale as well.

Well I would say X360 controls are better than at least LG phone

Ive never owned an LG phone, are they bad?

Any cellphone control is worse than console controllers for me =P

All of this was Switch undocked, so it wouldn't be that I don't think since it's a TV setting? So it's probably something to do with the different capture methods, and that epic might of over-saturated the mobile versions a tad.

Which I think is a bit of what's mostly the case here. You can see the Switch battle bus has a much richer shade of blue compared to the mobile's more paler/brighter blue.

Source to your next claim that Breath of the Wild has Anti-Aliasing? And Digital Foundry claimed it didn't?
With all due respect, I doubt anyone is going to take the word of a forum poster over an outlet such as Digital Foundry.

The fortnite mobile version proves that mobile performance for gaming is greatly exaggerated.

Galaxy s9 officially has 350 gigaflops (exynos version), the snapdragon 845 has 737 gigaflops but this in fp16 so we need to halve it, then we get 368 gigaflops. We don't know the gigaflops number for the iphone 8/X as Apple won't reveal it. 

According to anandtech, most phones GPU loses between 50-20% performance when pushed to the max (in the manhattan 3.1 offscreen test). But this is only when pushing the gpu to the max, what happens when a game pushes the CPU and GPU to the max at the same time? We get performance worse than Switch console in undocked mode.

Switch has 150 gigaflops when undocked.

So 13 years later Nintendo switch(undocked) and top smartphones still can't beat Xbox 360, that console have 240 gigaflops :)

https://www.anandtech.com/show/13039/the-lg-g7-review/3

I agree 100%, was just wondering why you singled them out lol

Well I would say X360 controls are better than at least LG phone

It's weird though, DF have been ambiguous and inconsistent on the topic off whether BOTW has AA. In some of their pieces they said it does, but that it isn't always active, other times they say there's none. I remember being annoyed by the lack of clarity on the topic back when it came out.

That certainly goes without saying.
I am always impressed with people who actually seriously game on phones though, props to them, but  it's not for me.

Which is why I would like sources. :P