So shouldn't your position be that the island belong to neither of the countries and they form their own government or communist society?

My argument wasn't that he was not a dictator, of course he is. But you didn't provide any sources of giving nukes to North Korea.

Well, ideally yes, but that doesn't change the current situation, and the current situation is that Russia controls the islands.

So, I see that you're just going to refuse to concede that you have no evidence and that you just made that up.

Yes they control the islands, but that wasn't your question.

If you are talking about real peace, then Japan is the country that haven't made any war, invasion or killing since the WW2.

You mean after Kim had said about destroying Japan, SK and or USA?

Also Satan 2 claims made by Putin is as invencible mean to nuke USA... funny how both countries complain of others having nukes while making more of theirs.

Let Russia have it , they need more space to live, and they have been suffered on having small country.

Apparently Japan having a good economical situation makes the need for space zero, while the immense underpopulated landmass of Russia will become rich with the islands.

I don't understand, can you elaborate? Is Kaliningrad remaining a part of Russia about jingo patriotism?
The US "owns" Saipan/Marianas, ceded by Japan after WWII, after Germany ceded them to Japan after WWI. What is difference?
Should Poland give up territory to Germany, since that was also result of WWII victors changing borders against fascist aggressors?

The US government simply happened to want to prevent Japan making peace with the other major Ally country against Axis.
Which would seem to be the normal outcome of that war, the fascist aggressor making peace with countries who defeated them.
I believe even the US originally considered that the normal outcome, they just sabotaged it once policy shifted post-WWII. 
So where is jingoism? Do you expect Russian speaking residents of islands to learn Japanese, or would you just kick them out?

What do you think of earlier 2+2 deal which Japan agreed to until changing it's stance at behest of US? Hard to get insight to secret diplomatic negotiations, but even if Japan apparently hasn't been seriously negotiating towards full peace treaty to Russia's liking, I have to say that if they did, the 2+2 deal would probably be accepted by Russian government, after all once it's been proposed it's hard to put genie back in bottle (although Japanese government rarely mentions this episode following US pressure to abandon it in Cold War). Like I wrote, the EEZ factor which isn't immediately apparent when comparing island land area, is enough for Japan to save face, without impacting most of Russian population. Although Shikotan does have small fishing town whose population would need to be respected.

Sounds like lebensraum to me. Rural Japan is in fact increasingly underpopulated, the phenomen of ghost towns and abandoned buildings is huge. The government wants to persuade residents to abandon towns for larger ones to reduce cost of providing services. Isolated Russian islands in the far north are hardly a pragmatic resolution to their real problems if towns in temperate climates with roads to other Japanese cities/towns are dying off.