By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Where do you stand in the Kuril Islands dispute?

CaptainExplosion said:
VGPolyglot said:

So, you're just making things up then.

No I'm not, Putin's friendship with North Korea is obvious. Russia and North Korea have had a thing even after the USSR fell.

OK, show me sources of Russia giving North Korea nukes then.



Around the Network
CaptainExplosion said:
VGPolyglot said:

OK, show me sources of Russia giving North Korea nukes then.

I told you I don't need sources, I just know, because Putin is cold-hearted tyrant who wants to destroy our basic rights and freedoms.

So, you've convinced yourself it's true because you want it to be true essentially.



Well, these islands don't have big value. For both sides this thing is something about jingo patriotism. As a Russian, I prefer sell it a high rate to Japan and forget about this story.
PS: sorry for my poor grammar.



CaptainExplosion said:
VGPolyglot said:

So, you've convinced yourself it's true because you want it to be true essentially.

I don't want it to be true, I just know because of recent events.

"I just know" if it was true there'd at least be something to back you up, you've provided nothing.



CaptainExplosion said:
VGPolyglot said:

"I just know" if it was true there'd at least be something to back you up, you've provided nothing.

Because I don't need to provide evidence of the obvious.

Russia was a fanatical dictatorship because of Stalin, and it's a fanatical dictatorship under Putin. Some things never change.

Or maybe because the evidence doesn't actually exist and you're making it up.



Around the Network
CaptainExplosion said:
VGPolyglot said:

Or maybe because the evidence doesn't actually exist and you're making it up.

I'm not making up anything, I'm going by observations. I'm starting to wonder if you're a Putin supporter, and that you're denying his wrongdoings actually happened.

I'm denying that Russia is supplying North Korea with nukes because you've provided no evidence other than "because I said so".



CaptainExplosion said:
VGPolyglot said:

I'm denying that Russia is supplying North Korea with nukes because you've provided no evidence other than "because I said so".

Well why wouldn't they supply North Korea with nukes?

Now you're trying to shift the burden on to me I see because you've failed in providing evidence. Russia giving North Korea nukes would be a PR disaster.



I stand in Brazil.

But on your consideration of Japan being able to become a potency despite having the island, you can look on the other side that Japan have very small land and sea for them while Russia have plethora of land so on your equality demands shouldn't Japan receive the land to be less unequal?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

CaptainExplosion said:
VGPolyglot said:

Now you're trying to shift the burden on to me I see because you've failed in providing evidence. Russia giving North Korea nukes would be a PR disaster.

Everything Putin has done as of late is a PR disaster, yet he's still in power through bullying his own people, so clearly he doesn't give a shit about human lives.

You still haven not provided evidence and I know that you won't, so there is either 3 possibilities here:

1. You have deluded yourself into thinking it's true

2. You know it's not true but you're lying

3. You are joking

Why you insist on this despite not being able to come up with anything is beyond me, unless you believe that by insisting in it it is going to make it true. All I asked for was a source, if it was so obvious there'd be a wealth of information for you to choose from.



DonFerrari said:
I stand in Brazil.

But on your consideration of Japan being able to become a potency despite having the island, you can look on the other side that Japan have very small land and sea for them while Russia have plethora of land so on your equality demands shouldn't Japan receive the land to be less unequal?

That's a very misleading way of describing equality, especially since internationalist socialism is anti-nationalist.