OK, it's your right to quit the debate, but I want to make sure you understand that my postscript was not a rhetorical question.  You said that dropping the A-bomb was the worst war crime in modern history, which includes the Nazi genocide program and for that matter the Rape of Nanking.  Do you stand by that?  I guess you don't have to defend it but I think you should at least clarify "yeah that's my position, goodbye". 

Thanks for proving their point. Whichever country attempts to do this to another should be dissolved by UNSC Mandate, with the country's Veto Power cancelled should it be a member. 

The good thing is that this is impossible. Russia would launch Dead Hand/Perimeter the moment most forces fell offline, and the state is an ethnic one. It cannot possibly fall to strife. Right now, Russia is actually stronger than the Soviets. Look at their GDP now and contrast with their GDP in the Brezhnev era. They don't need to be bigger to be more lethal. In other words, it's a hundred times more likely Mueller's investigation does end with an impeached Trump, ultraconservative unrest and eventual Civil War than the opposite. 

I am afraid that the weakest Russia you are going to get is the current one. It's also more dangerous than the most dangerous foe you faced. For once the US is presented with two choices it cannot ignore: Accept parity and stand down from their pedestal, or face erosion and eventually go the same way the Soviets did. 

But it surprises me you're advocating indirect ethnic cleansing and not being banned. People with your views should be rightfully thrown into Black Dolphin and never leave. 

Before Hitler invaded Poland, he took a piece of it with Danzig. He annexed Austria, he took a piece of Checkoslovakia arguing that it should be german because the sudet germans lived there.

Seems familliar to what is going on with Ukraine?

Just look at US military bases locations. Then add to this a mass media monopoly across a whole "progressive world" aka the west.
If you still somehow do not sure that Putin is a bloody monster then they will repeat it to you hundreds, thousands, billions of times. Again and again.

It's been years since Crimea was annexed and they haven't annexed anything since, not even Abkhazia or South Ossetia.

Neither Austria nor Czechoslovakia had seen their government shattered by nationalist and ethnocentric coups. This is closer to the Mexican American War... 

Thousands of people pouring across a border to settle, only to use their own existence as a pretext for annexing the land to their original nation? 

Yours words, not mine... 

The situation is different than that.

1. Hitler was conquering new lands for the purpose of building an Empire. This included lands that were never traditionally a part of Germany.
2. Crimea rebelled to return to Russia in response to the anti-Russian coup which seized control of Ukraine. Crimea was a part of Russia that was under Ukrainian control after the fall of the USSR as a measure of good faith between the nations.

Pre-Euromaidan polling had always suggested a 65-70% wish to rejoin Russia, with 10-15% to remain in Ukraine, and the rest undecided. Imagine how a coup by an anti-Russian government with suspected fascist leanings* is going to effect that opinion.

*I'm not suggesting they were fascist, but its a fact that a lot of people thought this at that time.

If he was trying to kill us, why would he launch it at his own country? Surely he'd actually launch it at us?